Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
Apr 05, 2018 - Jun 04, 2018
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018
Report date:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 492 (Reconstructed Human Cornea-like Epithelium (RhCE) Test Method for Identifying Chemicals Not Requiring Classification and Labelling for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
Version / remarks:
July 28, 2015
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: DB-ALM Protocol No. 164: Ocular Irritation Assay for Chemicals using EpiOcular™ EIT,
Version / remarks:
September 14, 2015
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: EpiOcular Eye Irritation Test (OCL-200-EIT) for the prediction of acute ocular irritation of chemicals; For use with MatTek Corporation`s Reconstructed Human EpiOcular Model; MatTek Corporation
Version / remarks:
June 29, 2015
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
(4-butoxy-2,3-difluorophenyl)boronic acid
EC Number:
692-793-0
Cas Number:
156487-12-6
Molecular formula:
C10H13BF2O2
IUPAC Name:
(4-butoxy-2,3-difluorophenyl)boronic acid
Test material form:
solid
Specific details on test material used for the study:
TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Treatment of test material prior to testing: No pre-treatment, the test item was applied neat to the tissues.

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent positive control
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL: 50 mg per tissue

NEGATIVE / VEHICLE CONTROL: 50 µL per tissue

Sterile deionized water was used as negative control.


POSITIVE CONTROL: 50 µL per tissue

Designation: Methyl acetate
Supplier: MatTek In Vitro Life Science Laboratories
Lot-No.: 022118ISA
Catalog #: TC-MA
Purity (GC): 99.7 %
Appearance: Colorless liquid
Expiration date: February 21, 2019
Storage: 15 to 30 °C

Duration of treatment / exposure:
6 hours
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
in vitro: duplicate design

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation parameter:
other: Viability %
Run / experiment:
Run 1 / Experiment 1
Value:
1.6
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
positive indication of irritation
Remarks:
According to OECD 492 no prediction can be made regarding the eye irritating potential.
Other effects / acceptance of results:
OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: No observations

ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
1. The negative control OD is > 0.8 and < 2.5 (1.671 and 1.474).
2. The mean relative viability of the positive control is below 50 % of the negative control viability (40.0 %).
3. The difference of viability between the two relating tissues of a single chemical is < 20 % (values between 1.1 % to 12.5 %) in the same run (for positive and negative control tissues and tissues of single chemicals).

The study met all acceptance criteria.

Any other information on results incl. tables

   Mean OD  Mean Viability
 Negative Control 2.034 100.0 % 
 Positive Control 0.603 29.6 %
 Test Item 0.033 1.6 %

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: UN GHS Category 1 or Category 2
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the present study, the test item did show an eye hazard potential. The test item is considered to be UN GHS Category 1 or Category 2.