Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
secondary literature

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of propyl gallate (E 310) as a food additive
Author:
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Year:
2014
Bibliographic source:
EFSA Journal 12(4), 3642
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Final Report on the Amended Safety Assessment of Propyl Gallate
Author:
Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel
Year:
2007
Bibliographic source:
International Journal of Toxicology 26 (Suppl. 3), 89–118
Reference Type:
other: unpublished study
Title:
Mutagenic evaluation of compound FDA 71-39, propyl gallate
Author:
Litton Bionetics
Year:
1974
Bibliographic source:
(PB-245 441):1–138

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
In a study from Litton Bionetics (1974), as cited by CIR (2007) and EFSA (2014), three different assays, a host-mediated assay, a cytogenetic assay and a dominant lethal assay, were used to evaluate the mutagenicity of Propyl gallate. In particular, in the in vitro cytogenetic study, human embryonic lung cultures (WI-38) were used. Doses tested were 0.5, 5 and 50 μg/mL. The cells were examined at 24, 48 and 72 hours. One hundred metaphases or anaphases per concentrations were examined.
GLP compliance:
no
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Propyl 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoate
EC Number:
204-498-2
EC Name:
Propyl 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoate
Cas Number:
121-79-9
Molecular formula:
C10H12O5
IUPAC Name:
propyl 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoate
Specific details on test material used for the study:
no data

Method

Target gene:
NA
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
other: Human embryonic lung cultures (WI-38)
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Metabolic activation:
not specified
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
0.5, 5 and 50 µg/mL
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: no data
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Cells were examined at 24, 48 and 72 hours.
- One hundred metaphases or anaphases per concentration were examined.
Rationale for test conditions:
no data
Evaluation criteria:
Chromosomal damage was scored.
Statistics:
no data

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
other: Human embryounic lung cultures (WI-38)
Metabolic activation:
not specified
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
not specified
Vehicle controls validity:
not specified
Untreated negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
not specified
Additional information on results:
The low and high doses caused 2% and 3% chromosomal aberrations, respectively, compared to 1% in the negative control; these variations were not considered as significant. Anaphase preparations were examined in this test. There was no demonstration of a clastogenic effect with 0, 3 and 2% cells with aberrations at 0.5, 5 and 50 μg/mL respectively, vs. 2% in the negative control.

Any other information on results incl. tables

According to the EFSA (2014) report, this study applied a limited experimental protocol, which was based on the examination of only 100 metaphases or 100 anaphases per concentration.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Based on an in vitro cytogenetic study from Litton Bionetics (1974), as cited by EFSA (2014) and CIR (2007), Propyl gallate is considered to be non-mutagenic.
Executive summary:

In an in vitro cytogenetic study from Litton Bionetics (1974), as cited by EFSA (2014) and CIR (2007), Propyl gallate was added to human embryonic lung cultures in anaphase at doses of 0.5, 5 and 50 µg/mL. The cells were examined at 24, 48 and 72 hours. One hundred metaphases or anaphases per concentrations were examined. Chromosomal damage was scored. The low and high doses caused 2% and 3% chromosomal aberrations, respectively, compared to 1% in the negative control; these variations were not considered as significant. Anaphase preparations were examined in this test. There was no demonstration of a clastogenic effect with 0, 3 and 2% cells with aberrations at 0.5, 5 and 50 μg/mL, respectively vs. 2% in the negative control. Based on this study, Propyl gallate is considered to be non-mutagenic.