Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2022-2023
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 211 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
Version / remarks:
2012
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method C.20 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
Samples were taken from the control and each surviving test group from freshly prepared test solutions (without food) and the corresponding aged test solutions (with food). Replicate vessels were pooled to give one sample. Sampling of the test solutions started with day 0 samples and was performed at least once per week throughout the test. Two renewal periods of 48 hours and one renewal period of 72 hours (weekend) were chosen for sampling.
Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
PREPARATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- Method: 48 hours of slow stirring
Test organisms (species):
Daphnia magna
Details on test organisms:
TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: water flea
- Strain/clone: Straus
- Age at study initiation: less than 24 hours
- Method of breeding: bred at IES Ltd under temperature and light conditions identical to those of the test
- Source: originally supplied by Daphnia Collection of the University of Basel/Switzerland in 2015
- Feeding during test: yes
- Food type: food mixture - one part of green algae of the species Desmodesmus subspicatus (freshly grown at IES Ltd) and one part of fish food suspension (Tetramin®)
- Amount: 0.2 mg TOC per Daphnia per day
- Frequency: daily
Test type:
semi-static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
21 d
Hardness:
2.5 mmol/L (= 250 mg/L as CaCO3)
Test temperature:
18 – 22 °C
pH:
7.9 ± 0.3
Dissolved oxygen:
>3 mg O2/L
Nominal and measured concentrations:
Nominal concentrations: 0.032, 0.10, 0.32, 1.0, 3.2, 10 mg/L WAF
Measured concentrations: 0.033, 0.089, 0.17, 0.54, 1.9, 5.4 mg/L (time-weighted mean measured)
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: glass vessels
- Type: closed, stoppered
- Material, headspace, fill volume: glass; no headspace, completely filled; 80 mL fill volume
- Aeration: none
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): 3 times a week - Monday, Wednesday, Friday
- No. of organisms per vessel: 1
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 10
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 10

TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: Elendt M7 Medium, according to OECD 211
- Alkalinity: 0.8 mmol/L

OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: 16 h light to 8 h dark with a 30 minutes transition period
- Light intensity: 15 and 20 µE m-2 s-1

EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED: immobility/mortality (daily), body length of adults (at the end of the test), number of offspring (daily)

TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: 3.2
- Range finding study: yes
- Test concentrations: 0.50, 5, 50 mg/L
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: yes, experience on solutions preparation and effects observed were taken into consideration for the main test design - 100% mortality at treatment level 50 mg/L.
Reference substance (positive control):
no
Key result
Duration:
21 d
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
>= 5.4 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (TWA)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
reproduction
Key result
Duration:
21 d
Dose descriptor:
EC10
Effect conc.:
> 5.4 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (TWA)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
reproduction
Duration:
21 d
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
> 5.4 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (TWA)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
reproduction
Duration:
21 d
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
>= 5.4 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (TWA)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth
Remarks:
body length
Duration:
21 d
Dose descriptor:
EC10
Effect conc.:
> 5.4 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (TWA)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth
Remarks:
body length
Duration:
21 d
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
> 5.4 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (TWA)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth
Remarks:
body length
Duration:
21 d
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
>= 5.4 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (TWA)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
mortality
Duration:
21 d
Dose descriptor:
EC10
Effect conc.:
> 5.4 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (TWA)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
mortality
Duration:
21 d
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
> 5.4 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (TWA)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
mortality





















































































Loading Rate of Test Item (WAF*)


[mg/L]



Measured Concentrations of the test item [mg/L]



Mean measured concentration (time-weighted means)


[mg/L]



Fresh Media



Aged Media with Food



Days



Days



0



2



14



2



5



16



0.032



0.0424



0.0457



0.0341



0.0222



0.0296



0.0214



0.033



0.10



0.0878



0.118



0.123



0.0718



0.0606



0.0827



0.089



0.32



0.21



0.224



0.228



0.159



0.101



0.138



0.17



1.0



0.69



0.709



0.679



0.458



0.361



0.412



0.54



3.2



2.34



2.54



2.21



1.73



1.34



1.41



1.9



10



6.92



7.21



5.87



4.96



4.1



3.88



5.4



*: Water Accommodated Fraction


 


Summary of the results after 21 days of exposure of the test animals













































































Biological Endpoints



WAF Loading Rate of Test Item (Mean Measured Test Item Concentration) [mg/L]



 



 



Control



0.032
(0.033)



0.10
(0.089)



0.32
(0.17)



1.0
(0.54)



3.2
(1.9)



10
(5.4)



 



Survival [%] after 21 Days of Exposure



90#



100



90#



100



100



90#



100



 



Mean Reproduction Rate (Living Offspring per Surviving Adult)



173



189



195



213



207



172



169



 



% Reduction in Mean Reproduction Rate



-



-9.3



-13



-23



-20



0.51



2.0



 



Mean Body Length [mm] of the Adults



4.57



4.56



4.58



4.59



4.57



4.58



4.54



 



% Reduction in Mean Body Length of the Adults



-



0.15



-0.24



-0.51



-0.07



-0.24



0.58



 



#:          The mortality observed in the control and these treatments was considered as being within the natural biological variability and not as a toxic effect of the test item, since there was no clear dose-response effect. Moreover, 20 % mortality in female daphnia in the control is tolerated by the OECD Guideline No. 211 (2012). The offspring produced by these daphnia is therefore excluded from the calculation of the mean reproduction rate, i.e., it is based on the surviving adults (according to the OECD Guideline No. 211, 2012).


 


The EC values based on mean measured concentrations are summarized in the table below.










































































Biological Endpoints



ECx Values,


NOEC, LOEC



Based on Mean Measured Concentrations of Test Item [mg/L]



Inhibition of Reproduction Rate



EC10
(95 % CI)



> 5.4



EC20
(95 % CI)



> 5.4



EC50
(95 % CI)



> 5.4



NOEC



≥ 5.4



LOEC



> 5.4



Inhibition of Body Length



EC10
(95 % CI)



> 5.4



EC20
(95 % CI)



> 5.4



EC50
(95 % CI)



> 5.4



NOEC



≥ 5.4



LOEC



> 5.4



Mortality



EC10
(95 % CI)



> 5.4



EC20
(95 % CI)



> 5.4



EC50
(95 % CI)



> 5.4



NOEC



≥ 5.4



LOEC



> 5.4



95 % CI:   95 % confidence limits

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
In conclusion, no toxic effects of the test item were observed on survival, growth (body length) and reproduction of the test animals up to and including the highest WAF of 10 mg/L tested (5.4 mg/L, mean measured).
Endpoint:
long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 211 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
14d range finding test with chemical analyses
GLP compliance:
no
Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
Samples of all new test concentrations and old stock solutions were taken as often as possible in the study. New samples were taken in the test vessels before the addition of algae. Samples were subsequently transferred to HPLC vials. Old samples were taken from pooled test vessels and filtered prior to the addition to HPLC vials. Samples were diluted in test medium to ensure that they remained in the range of the calibration curve.
Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
Preparation of the stock solutions:
The test substance is dissolvable at the required test concentrations. To prepare the stock solutions for every medium renewal, between 0.2003 and 0.2013g of test substance was weighed on an analytical balance. The test substance was transferred to a 1L volumetric flask using a watch glass and glass funnel. The entire 1 L of test medium was used to rinse the watch glass and funnel in order to make a stock as close to the nominal concentrations as possible. Although soluble the stock required stirring for at least one hour before a homogeneous stock was achieved. The stock pH in the first stock was found to be pH 8 and therefore none of the stock solution made during the study were pH adjusted due to the pH being close to that of the test medium.

Preparation of the test solutions:
Test solutions were prepared by further dilution of the relevant stock solutions with test medium in volumetric flasks. All pipetting took place while stock was under agitation and all pipettes were rinsed at least once with the stock and the contents discarded. Test vessels were filled directly from volumetric flasks immediately after preparation. The solutions were renewed 5 times a week. A new stock was not always made.
Test organisms (species):
Daphnia magna
Details on test organisms:
The test animals were taken from a Daphnia magna clone 5 stock, (Origin: WIL Research Europe, The Netherlands) cultured in conformity with the relevant SOP. The parent animals were cultured in test medium from the day they were born.
The animals used in the test were less than 24 hours old and were obtained from parent animals reproducing parthenogenically and having an age of 2-4 weeks (having previously produced at least one brood before use). The culture is checked half-yearly for sensitivity by a reference test with potassium dichromate. The most recent reference test results were within the range given in the guideline and the culture was deemed suitable for use. In addition no abnormal mortality was observed in the cultures and no winter eggs were present.

Feeding:
Test animals were fed a diet of 0.1 to 0.2 mg carbon per daphnid per week day (in 50 mL) or 0.2 to 0.4 mg (in 100 mL) (Friday to Sunday) during weekends, in the form of the algal strain Chlorella vulgaris. The strain is cultured in the Environmental Chemistry laboratory and total organic carbon content has previously been measured.
Test type:
semi-static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
14 d
Test temperature:
19.6-20.6 degree C
pH:
7.1-8.4
Dissolved oxygen:
8.7 - 10.3 mg O2/L
Nominal and measured concentrations:
Nominal: 0.48, 1.52, 4.88 15.6 and 50 mg/L
Time weighted average measured concentrations: 0.16, 0.54, 1.66, 6.29 and 16.8 mg/L
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 100 mL glass beakers
- Type (delete if not applicable): open
- Aeration: No
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): daily renewal, 5 times per week
- No. of organisms per vessel: 1
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 10
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 10

TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: M4 Elendt medium
- Culture medium different from test medium: No

OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: 16h light

EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) : number of offspring, parent mortality, length and weight

TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: 3.2
Reference substance (positive control):
not specified
Key result
Duration:
14 d
Dose descriptor:
EC10
Effect conc.:
0.1 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (TWA)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
reproduction
Duration:
14 d
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
1.1 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (TWA)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
reproduction
Duration:
14 d
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
0.16 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (TWA)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
reproduction
Details on results:
Parent animal mortality:
One parent animal died at 4.88 mg/L and all parent animals died at the highest concentration.

Coefficient of variation of control fecundity:
A high level of variation was observed in the reproduction of the control. This is also represented by the high number of immobile juveniles observed. The study director has observed that daily refreshment in synthetic medium has also been observed to cause negative effects to reproduction behavior in
previous studies. Possibly due to reduced food or due to regular disturbance of the test animals.
However this method was chosen to maximize test substance exposure. The daphnia culture was otherwise healthy.

Reproduction (Primary endpoint):
The EC10 and EC50 for reproduction were calculated as 0.1mg/L and 1.1 mg/L respectively based on time weighted mean concentrations. The NOEC that was determined statistically (1.6mg/L) was not considered reliable due to the excessive control variation making the determination two broad and therefore not sufficiently worst case. For this reason the study director has set the NOEC at the first test concentration in which equal or more juveniles were observed when compared to the control. The NOEC was therefore determined as 0.16 mg/L based on time weighted mean concentrations.

Length (Secondary endpoint):
No significant difference in length was detected in all surviving adults

Dry weight (Supporting endpoint):
No significant difference in dry weight was visible in the dry weight data.

EC50 for parent animals:
An EC50 based on survival of parent animals at the end of the test was determined as 9.4mg/L. The NOEC was determined as 6.3 mg/L based on time weighted mean concentrations.

Any other biological effects observed:
A large numbers of juveniles were born early at all concentrations including the control and were scored immobile / dead. In reality many of these juveniles were alive but distinguishing between them was not always possible. These results were emitted from statistical analysis and only the clearly alive and mobile juveniles were used for endpoint determination. The nature of the daily refreshment can result in less food in the early stages of the study and/or more disruption to the parent animals. However a test substance related effect was observed on the living juveniles and the control animals were otherwise in good health.
Reported statistics and error estimates:
The data on reproduction and parental length were imputed into the Toxrat V2.10 professional statistical software package and assessed using the OECD 211 template. The OECD templates are closed and cannot be altered and are therefore considered to remain valid for the OECD 211 guideline without further validation.
Validity criteria fulfilled:
no
Remarks:
all criteria were met except acceptable control variation (25%).
Conclusions:
Test results give a good indication for the long-term endpoint and for the definitive range for the final study.
Executive summary:

The purpose of this study was to assess the toxicity of the test substance dissolved in fresh water, on the reproductive efficacy of Daphnia magna STRAUS - clone 5, in a semi-static test based on the OECD Guideline No. 211 (OECD, 2012). The study was modified and conducted for a shorter 14 day period as a range finding test in preparation for a planned definitive GLP study.

The primary test criterion used to indicate the toxicity of the test substance was reproductive capacity expressed as the total number of neonates per surviving parent animal at the end of the study due to their being no dose response related parent mortality where reproduction took place. Data on parental length and dry-weight was also generated for use in determining secondary endpoints as required.

The nominal concentrations used in the study were as follows:

0.48, 1.52, 4.88 15.6 and 50 mg/L including a test medium only control.

All concentrations given refer to the technical product as supplied by the sponsor. Endpoints are all based on time weighted mean concentrations.

The following quality criteria were met:

 Cultures were in good health (i.e. disease free, no ephippia or males, no discolored animals valid reference test).

 No parent mortality occurred

 The average number of juveniles per parent animal alive at the end of the test in the control (60 in a standard test) was for this shortened test not a strict quality criterion. However considering the length of the study and applying the same criteria an average of 39 juveniles would be expected. The average number of juveniles per adult in the control in this study was 39. This criterion is considered to have been met.

 Analytical quality criteria demonstrating a suitably robust analytical method were met.

The following quality criterion was not met:

 Acceptable control variation (25%) as recommended in the test guideline was significantly exceeded as a result of the daily solution refreshment. The study director accounted for this in the endpoint calculation and applied a worst case NOEC based on living juveniles per adult at the end of the test. This is considered acceptable until a definitive GLP endpoint becomes available.

The EC10 and EC50 for reproduction were calculated as 0.1mg/L and 1.1 mg/L respectively based on time weighted mean concentrations (TWM). The NOEC for reproduction was determined manually by the study director as 0.16 mg/L (TWM). The secondary endpoints showed no significant effects or did not contain significant replicates for a reliable statistical analysis.

Description of key information

In a GLP study according to OECD 211, no toxic effects of the test item were observed on survival, growth (body length) and reproduction of the test animals up to and including the highest WAF of 10 mg/L tested (5.4 mg/L, mean measured). The NOEC for all endpoints was determined to be >= 5.4 mg/L and the EC10 and EC50 for all endpoints was determined to be > 5.4 mg/L.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Fresh water invertebrates

Fresh water invertebrates
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect concentration:
>= 5.4 mg/L
Fresh water invertebrates
Dose descriptor:
EC10
Effect concentration:
> 5.4 mg/L

Additional information