Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 259-627-5 | CAS number: 55406-53-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2001-06-29
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 001
- Report date:
- 2001
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
- Version / remarks:
- 1998
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EEC Directive 88/302/EEC Mutagenicity In vitro Mammalian Cell - Gene Mutation Test
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- other: in vitro mammalian gene mutation assay (HPRT)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 3-iodo-2-propynyl butylcarbamate
- EC Number:
- 259-627-5
- EC Name:
- 3-iodo-2-propynyl butylcarbamate
- Cas Number:
- 55406-53-6
- Molecular formula:
- C8H12INO2
- IUPAC Name:
- 3-iodoprop-2-yn-1-yl butylcarbamate
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: 147-270300-1
Method
- Target gene:
- HPRT locus
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS USED
- Source of cells: University of Ulm
- Doubling time: 10 - 14 h
- Modal number of chromosomes: 22
MEDIA USED
- Type and identity of media:
hypoxanthine-free Eagle´s Minimal Essential Medium, supplemented with nonessential amino acids, L-glutamine (2 mM), MEM-vitamins, NaHC03, penicillin (100 units/mL), streptomycin (100 µg/mL) and heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (final concentration: 10%) (Seromed). This medium is referred to as culture medium. During treatement the serum content was reduced to 2%.
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically 'cleansed' against high spontaneous background: yes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- rat liver S9 fraction
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Without metabolic activation concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 15 µg/mL
With metabolic activation concentrations were between 0.5 and 96 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle/solvent used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: selected based on test item solubility
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9,10-dimethylbenzanthracene
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
- Cell density at seeding: 4x10^6 per flask
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 16-24 h
- Exposure duration: 5 h
- Expression time: 6 d
SELECTION AGENT: 6-TG
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth - Evaluation criteria:
- - Mutant frequencies will only be used for assessment, if at least 5 dishes per culture were available and relative survival to treatment, relative population growth and absolute cloning efficiency were 10% or greater.
- A trial will be considered positive if a concentration-related and in parallel cultures reproducible increase in mutant frequencies is observed. To be relevant, the increase in mutant frequencies should be at least two to three times that of the highest negative or vehicle control value observed in the respective trial. If this result can be reproduced in a second trial, the test substance is considered to be mutagenic.
- Despite these criteria, a positive result will only be considered relevant, if no significant change in osmolality compared to the vehicle control can be observed. Otherwise, unphysiological culture conditions may be the reason for the positive result (Scott et al, 1991).
- A test substance will be judged as equivocal if there is no strictly concentration related increase in mutation frequencies but if one or more concentrations induce a reproducible and biologically relevant increase in mutant frequencies in all trials.
- An assay will be considered negative if no reproducible and relevant increases of mutant frequencies were observed. - Statistics:
- The statistical analysis relies on the mutant frequencies which are submitted to a weighted analysis of variance as well as to a weighted recursive regression, both with Poisson derived weights (Hsie et al., 1981; Arlett et al., 1989).
According to the acceptance criteria mutant frequencies based on less than 5 plates and/or on a relative survival to treatment and/or a relative population growth and/or an absolute cloning efficiency below 10% are not included in the statistical analysis.
The two mutant frequency values obtained per group are, although somewhat related, considered as independent measurements thus increasing the power of the statistical tests applied. Since the protocol of the HPRT assay requires at least two independent trials, the overall analysis without respectively with activation is the most important one for classifying substances into mutagens and non-mutagens. However, separate analyses will be run for each trial in order to examine the consistency of the results.
All acceptable groups are included in the weighted analysis of variance followed by pain/vise comparisons to the vehicle control on a nominal significance level of a = 0.05 using the Dunnett test (Dunnett, 1955). The regression analysis part is performed on the basis of the actual concentrations thereby omitting the positive, negative and vehicle controls. If there is a significant concentration related increase of the mutant frequency (a = 0.05) in the main analysis the highest concentration will be dropped and the analysis will be repeated. This procedure will be repeated until p > 0.05. In that way eliminated concentrations are flagged correspondingly.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- without S9 at 1 µg/mL and above; with S9 at 5 µg/mL and above
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: none
- Effects of osmolality: none
- Evaporation from medium: no
- Water solubility: DMSO was used as vehicle
- Precipitation: occured at concentrations of 1200 and higher
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: yes
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: Please refer to "Any other information including tables"
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Summary of mutant frequency [10^-6] of the HPRT mutagenesis assay in V79 cells
|
||||||||
Mutant Frequency [10^-6] |
Without metabolic activation |
With metabolic activation |
||||||
Concentration [µg/mL] |
Trial 1 |
Trial 2 |
Trial 3 |
Trial 1 |
Trial 2 |
Trial 3 |
Trial 4 |
Trial 5 |
Negative control |
1.8 3.6 |
0.5 0.5 |
1.3 0.6 |
0.7 2.4 |
0.7 0.7 |
1.2 1.2 |
1.2 1.4 |
0.9 1.1 |
Vehicle control (DMSO) |
3.0 3.0 |
0.7 0.4 |
2.4 2.4 |
1.4 1.4 |
1.6 2.4 |
0.5 0.4 |
1.8 4 |
1.5 1.0 |
0.01 |
- |
0.7 0.4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.05 |
- |
0.4 0.8 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.1 |
4.8 0.5 |
0.4 0.4 |
- |
0.4 0.8 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.5 |
3.7 0.7 |
1.6* 1.6 |
- |
0.4 1.3 |
3.5 1.0 |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
3.4 1.2 |
0.4 1.0 |
2.3 2.9 |
1.6 0.6 |
1.3 1.4 |
- |
- |
- |
2 |
3.4 2.7 |
- |
2.3 6.2 |
0.9 0.8 |
1.1 1.2 |
- |
- |
- |
3 |
7.8 13.7 |
5.3* 4.6# |
5.5 1.5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4 |
12.6 8.8 |
- |
5.8 5.4 |
1.3 0.5 |
1.7 0.8 |
- |
- |
- |
5 |
23.1 1.5 |
- |
3.4 2.7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
6 |
- |
N |
3.8 8.5 |
1.3 3.3 |
0.6 1.1 |
- |
- |
- |
7 |
- |
- |
0.8 2.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
8 |
- |
- |
0.7 1.6 |
0.4 2.4 |
1.1 0.6 |
- |
- |
- |
9 |
- |
N |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
10 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2.7 1.6 |
- |
- |
- |
12 |
- |
N |
- |
- |
5.1 0.9 |
0.4 0.5 |
0.4 0.8 |
- |
14 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1.4 3.4 |
0.4 0.4 |
- |
- |
15 |
- |
N |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
16 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5.1* 3.5 |
- |
- |
18 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.5 0.8 |
0.4 1.1 |
- |
20 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.4 0.7 |
- |
- |
22 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1.2 1.2 |
- |
- |
24 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.4 2.8 |
2.2 1.1 |
1.6 2.0 |
30 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1.0 0.5 |
- |
36 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.5 0.6 |
1.6 0.5 |
42 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.4 2.4 |
- |
48 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1.0 0.5 |
N |
60 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
N |
72 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
N |
84 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
N |
96 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
N |
N |
Positive control (EMS) |
242.7 374.2 |
458.6 353.6 |
242.7 374.2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Positive control (DMBA) |
- |
- |
- |
109.8 123.2 |
36 104.1 |
112.2 58.8 |
133.1 157.1 |
18.1 21.1 |
Historical Control (solvent: DMSO) |
0 – 14.8 |
0.4 – 20.3 |
||||||
Historical Control (solvent: none) |
0 – 19.3 |
0.4 – 17.9 |
||||||
# cytotoxicity (survival to treatment or population growth < 10 % of vehicle control) N not tested due to cytotoxicity * mutant frequency in each parallel culture > 2´(mutant frequency of highest control) |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The test item was tested in the V79/HPRT-test in concentrations ranging from 0.01 µg/mL to 15 µg/mL without S9 mix and from 0.1 µg/mL to 96 µg/mL with S9 mix. Under both activation conditions, clear cytotoxic effects were induced. The test item induced no biologically relevant increases in mutant frequencies. The positive controls EMS and DMBA had a marked mutagenic effect, as was seen by a biologically relevant increase in mutant frequencies as compared to the corresponding negative controls and thus demonstrated the sensitivity of the test system and the activity of the used S9 mix. Despite this sensitivity, the test item is considered to be non-mutagenic in the V79/HPRT forward mutation assay, both with and without metabolic activation.
- Executive summary:
The test item was evaluated for point mutagenic effects at the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase locus (forward mutation assay) in V79 cell cultures. Without S9 mix concentrations of up to and including 15 µg/mL were employed. With S9 mix concentrations up to and including 96 µg/mL were used. Without and with S9 mix the test item induced decreases in survival to treatment and decreases in relative population growth. These results revealed a significant concentration-related cytotoxicity of the test item. Precipitation of the test item in the culture medium was not observed. Without and with S9 mix there was no biologically relevant increase in mutant frequency above that of the vehicle controls.
Ethyl methanesulfonate and Dimethylbenzanthracene induced clear mutagenic effects and demonstrated the sensitivity of the test system and the activity of the S9 mix.
Based on these results, the test item is considered to be non-mutagenic in the V79/HPRT Forward Mutation Assay, both with and without metabolic activation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.