Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Environmental fate & pathways

Bioaccumulation: aquatic / sediment

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
bioaccumulation in aquatic species: fish
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Justification for type of information:
information from database
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Calculated (ACD/Labs) Software V11.02
Temp.:
25 °C
Type:
BCF
Value:
1 dimensionless
Remarks on result:
other: pH 1-3
Temp.:
25 °C
pH:
4
Type:
BCF
Value:
1.53 dimensionless
Temp.:
25 °C
pH:
5
Type:
BCF
Value:
5.23 dimensionless
Temp.:
25 °C
pH:
6
Type:
BCF
Value:
6.93 dimensionless
Key result
Temp.:
25 °C
pH:
7
Type:
BCF
Value:
7.16 dimensionless
Temp.:
25 °C
Type:
BCF
Value:
7.19
Remarks on result:
other: pH 8-10
Validity criteria fulfilled:
no
Conclusions:
The calculated BCF value is reported to 7.16 at pH 7 and 25°C.
Executive summary:

The results were calculated with (ACD/Labs) Software V11.02 and are thus considered to be reliable with restrictions.

Description of key information

The calculated BCF value is reported to 7.16 at pH 7 and 25°C. The result was calculated with (ACD/Labs) Software V11.02 and is thus considered to be reliable with restrictions.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

BMF in fish (dimensionless):
7.16

Additional information

In a further database, results from 2 different calculation models are in the range 1.09e-01 to 6.14. Both mean and median value are 3.13. The results were calculated with generally accepted models and arre thus considered to be reliable with restrictions.