Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
August 2002
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
Read across study
Justification for type of information:
Based on its composition and physico chemical properties, fatty acids, C5-9, hexaesters with dipentaerythritol is considered to be a suitable read across substance to address the skin irritation endpoint of the test substance, fatty acids, C9, hexaesters with dipentaerythritol.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
not specified
Test system:
human skin model
Remarks:
Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE)
Source species:
human
Cell type:
non-transformed keratinocytes
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Control samples:
yes, concurrent negative control
yes, concurrent positive control
Amount/concentration applied:
test material used as received, undiluted
Duration of treatment / exposure:
1, 4, and 24 h
Number of replicates:
each treatment was conducted in duplicate
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
ET50 (hr) > 24
Value:
88.4
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The substance produced an ET50 > 24 h, indicating that it was non-irritating under the study conditions.
Executive summary:

A study was conducted to evaluate the skin irritation potential of the read across substance, fatty acids, C5-9, hexaesters with dipentaerythritol, according to a method similar to OECD Guideline 439. MatTek EpiDerm tissue samples were exposed to undiluted substance for 1, 4 or 24 h. Following treatment, the viability of the tissues was determined using MTT uptake and conversion, and the absorbance of each sample was measured at 450 nm using a reference wavelength of 690 nm. The viability was then expressed as a percent of the control values. The mean percent viability for each time point was used to calculate an ET50 which represents the time at which the EpiDerm tissue viability was reduced by 50% compared to the control tissues. The substance produced an ET50 > 24 h, indicating that it was non-irritating under the study conditions (DeGeorge, 2002).

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
August 7, 2002
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Justification for type of information:
Based on its composition and physico chemical properties, fatty acids, C5-9, hexaesters with dipentaerythritol is considered to be a suitable read across substance to address the eye irritation endpoint of the test substance, fatty acids, C9, hexaesters with dipentaerythritol.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 492 (Reconstructed Human Cornea-like Epithelium (RhCE) Test Method for Identifying Chemicals Not Requiring Classification and Labelling for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
Version / remarks:
MatTek EpiOcular MTT Viability Assay.
Draize correlation
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
not specified
Species:
other: MatTek EpiOcular tissues
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount / concentration applied:
100 µl test material used as received undiluted
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4, 16, 64, and 256 min
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
Each treatment was conducted in duplicate
Irritation parameter:
other: Viability assay %
Run / experiment:
256 min
Value:
66.9
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
not applicable
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The substance produced an ET50 > 256 min, indicating that it was non- to minimally irritating under the study conditions.
Executive summary:

A study was conducted to evaluate the skin irritation potential of the read across substance, fatty acids, C5-9, hexaesters with dipentaerythritol, according to a method similar to OECD Guideline 492. MatTek EpiOcular tissue samples were exposed to undiluted substance for 16, 64 or 256 min. Following treatment, the viability of the tissues was determined using MTT uptake and conversion, and the absorbance of each sample was measured at 540 nm using a reference wavelength of 690 nm. The viability was then expressed as a percent of the control values. The mean percent viability for each time point was used to calculate an ET50 which represents the time at which the EpiOcular tissue viability was reduced by 50% compared to the control tissues. The substance produced an ET50 > 256 min, indicating that it was non- to minimally irritating under the study conditions (DeGeorge, 2002).

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Skin irritation

A study was conducted to evaluate the skin irritation potential of the read across substance, fatty acids, C5-9, hexaesters with dipentaerythritol, according to a method similar to OECD Guideline 439. MatTek EpiDerm tissue samples were exposed to undiluted substance for 1, 4 or 24 h. Following treatment, the viability of the tissues was determined using MTT uptake and conversion, and the absorbance of each sample was measured at 450 nm using a reference wavelength of 690 nm. The viability was then expressed as a percent of the control values. The mean percent viability for each time point was used to calculate an ET50 which represents the time at which the EpiDerm tissue viability was reduced by 50% compared to the control tissues. The substance produced an ET50 > 24 h, indicating that it was non-irritating under the study conditions (DeGeorge, 2002).

Eye irritation

A study was conducted to evaluate the skin irritation potential of the read across substance, fatty acids, C5-9, hexaesters with dipentaerythritol, according to a method similar to OECD Guideline 492. MatTek EpiOcular tissue samples were exposed to undiluted substance for 16, 64 or 256 min. Following treatment, the viability of the tissues was determined using MTT uptake and conversion, and the absorbance of each sample was measured at 540 nm using a reference wavelength of 690 nm. The viability was then expressed as a percent of the control values. The mean percent viability for each time point was used to calculate an ET50 which represents the time at which the EpiOcular tissue viability was reduced by 50% compared to the control tissues. The substance produced an ET50 > 256 min, indicating that it was non- to minimally irritating under the study conditions (DeGeorge, 2002).

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the results of in vitro studies with the read across substance, fatty acids, C5-9, hexaesters with dipentaerythritol, the test substance does not require classification for skin or eye irritation according to EU CLP (EC 1272/2008) criteria.