Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Acute Toxicity: oral

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2012-12-18 to 2013-03-11
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2013
Report date:
2013

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Bioassay Labor für biologische Analytik GmbH, Im Neuenheimer Feld 515/519, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Test material form:
solid
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Lot/batch No.of test material: COD-001701
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 2014-11-01
- Purity test date: 2012-10-24

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature (or cooler)


Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Wiga GmbH, Sandhofer Weg 7, 97633 Sulzfeld, Germany
- Females nulliparous and non-pregnant: yes
- Age at study initiation: 9 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 170 g to 194 g
- Fasting period before study: 16 h before administration
- Housing: single (Makrolon cage, type III
- Diet: VRF1(P); SDS Special Diets Services, 67122 Altrip, Germany (ad libitum)
- Water: tap water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3
- Humidity (%): 30 to 70
- Air changes (per hr): 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: 2013-01-14 to 2013-02-05

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
CMC (carboxymethyl cellulose)
Details on oral exposure:
VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: 20 g/100 mL
- Purity: 0.5% solution in deionised water

MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED: 10 mL

CLASS METHOD (if applicable)
- Rationale for the selection of the starting dose: request of the sponsor
Doses:
2000 mg/kg body weight
No. of animals per sex per dose:
3
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations: Recording of clinical signs several times on the day of administration, and at least once daily thereafter each workday for the individual animals.
- Frequency of weighing: Individual body weights shortly before administration (day 0), weekly thereafter and on the last day of observation.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight
Statistics:
Not applicable

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Key result
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
discriminating dose
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
Mo mortality occurred
Clinical signs:
In the first 2000 mg/kg bw test group impaired general state and piloerection were observed in two animals from hour 2 until hour 5 after administration. One animal did not show any symptoms.
In the second 2000 mg/kg bw test group no clinical signs were observed during clinical examination in all animals.
Body weight:
The mean body weight increased within the normal range throughout the study period. Two animals showed only a small weight gain during the second post-exposure week.
Gross pathology:
There were no macroscopic pathological findings at the end of the observation period.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met