Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
February - March 1997
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP OECD 406 guideline-compliant study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1997
Report date:
1997

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
Buehler test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
non-LLNA method was performed because the study was performed in 1997 i.e before the publication of the LLNA (guideline OECD 429 adopted in 2002)

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Reaction mass of 2,4,6-tris(1-phenylethyl)phenol and 2,6-bis(1-phenylethyl) phenol
EC Number:
915-333-5
IUPAC Name:
Reaction mass of 2,4,6-tris(1-phenylethyl)phenol and 2,6-bis(1-phenylethyl) phenol

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Sex:
male
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Italia S.p.A.
- Age at study initiation: approximately 6 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 381 - 490 g
- Housing: 2 or 3 animals per wire cage (40.5 x 38.5 x 18 cm) with a stainless steel feeder
- Diet : ad libitum
- Water : ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 2
- Humidity (%): 55 +/- 10
- Air changes (per hr): approximately 20
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12 (7 a.m. / 7 p.m.)


IN-LIFE DATES: From: February 3, 1997 To: March 21, 1997

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: acetone
Concentration / amount:
75% (w/v) for both induction and challenge phases (0.3 mL per patch)
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: acetone
Concentration / amount:
75% (w/v) for both induction and challenge phases (0.3 mL per patch)
No. of animals per dose:
20 (treated) + 10 (control)
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
In a preliminary test on 2 animals, the concentrations of 25, 50 and 75% (w/v) of test substance were tested for their irritation potential and applied to the skin as an occlusive patch for 6 hours. All animals were observed for up to 48 hours for local reactions at the application sites. All three concentrations tested were well tolerated and exerted no irritation.

MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 3 (days 0, 6 and 13)
- Exposure period: 6 hours
- Test group: Test substance
- Control group: Vehicle
- Site: 6 x 6 cm clipped skin area on left flank
- Frequency of applications: single applications
- Duration: 13 days
- Concentrations: 75% (w/v) in acetone


B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: Single application
- Day(s) of challenge: Day 27
- Exposure period: 6 hours
- Test groups: Test substance (posterior flank) + Vehicle (anterior flank)
- Control group: Test substance (posterior flank) + Vehicle (anterior flank)
- Site: 6 x 6 cm clipped skin area on right flank
- Concentrations: 75% (w/v) in acetone
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 hours after 6-h challenge


OTHER: Not applicable
Challenge controls:
10 male animals were challenged with both test substance (right posterior flank) and vehicle alone (right anterior flank)
Positive control substance(s):
not specified

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
No data

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
75% (w/v)
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
Male No. 3 died of acute enteritis on day 27
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
75% (w/v)
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
Male No. 3 died of acute enteritis on day 27
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0% (w/v)
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
None
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0% (w/v)
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
None
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Group:
positive control
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
No sensitizing potential was detected in a Buehler test at 75% (w/v) in acetone.
The test substance was therefore not classified for skin sensitisation according to the criteria of Annex VI Directive 67/748/EEC or UN/EU GHS.
Executive summary:

In a dermal sensitization study (RBM study No. 970076) with Tristyrenated phenol/Distyrenated phenol (75/25 molar %) in acetone, 6-week old Dunkin-Hartley Guinea-pigs (20 test and 10 control males) were tested using the method of Buehler. Topical induction was performed applying test substance at 75% (w/v) in acetone (test animals) or vehicle alone (control animals) to a left flank clipped skin area on days 0, 6 and 13. Challenge application with both test substance at 75% (w/v) and vehicle alone was performed on a right flank clipped skin area on day 27. Local reactions were assessed 24 and 48 hours later.

 

One test animal died on day 27, but this death bore no relationship with test substance. No cutaneous reactions were observed in any of the test or control animals following challenge.

 

In this study, TSP/DSP at the concentration of 75% (w/v) was not a dermal sensitizer using the non-adjuvant Buehler test method.

TSP/DSP is not classified for skin sensitisation according to the criteria of Annex VI Directive 67/748/EEC or UN/EU GHS.