Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 264-036-0 | CAS number: 63225-53-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test, local effects, oral (OECD 422), rat: NOAEL = 100 mg/kg bw/day
Combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test, systemic toxicity, oral (OECD 422), rat: NOAEL = 300 mg/kg bw/day
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
- Remarks:
- screening study (OECD 422)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 19 Oct - 21 Dec 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in 2016
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Országos Gyógyszerészeti és Élelmezés-egészségügyi Intézet, Budapest, Hungary
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Hsd.Han: of Wistar origin
- Details on species / strain selection:
- The rat is regarded as suitable species for reproduction studies and the test guideline is designed to use the rat. The Wistar rat was selected due to large experience with this strain of rat in reproduction toxicity studies and known fertility.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Toxi-Coop Zrt.Budapest, Hungary
- Females nulliparous and non-pregnant: yes
- Age at study initiation: 63 - 66 days (males), 84 - 86 days (females)
- Weight at study initiation: 250 - 306 g (males), 189 - 236 g (females); The weight variation did not exceed ± 20 per cent of the mean weight.
- Housing: 2 animals of the same sex per cage (before mating), 1 male and 1 female per cage (mating), individually (pregnant females), 2 animals per cage (males after mating), 2 or 3 animals of the same sex per cage (recovery animals) in Type III polypropylene/polycarbonate (Size: 22 x 32 x 19 cm (width x length x height)); certified laboratory wood bedding (Lignocel® Hygienic Animal Bedding, J. Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH+Co.KG, Rosenberg, Germany) suitable as nesting material
- Diet: ssniff® SM R/M-Z+H complete diet for rats and mice – breeding and maintenance (ssniff Spezialdiäten GmbH, Soest, Germany), ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 21 days
DETAILS OF FOOD AND WATER QUALITY: The food was considered not to contain any contaminants that could reasonably be expected to affect the purpose or integrity of the study. The supplier provided an analytical certificate of the standard diet for the batch used. Water quality control analysis and microbiological assessment are performed once in every six months by Government Office of Capital Budapest Department of Public Health and Medical Officer Service (Budapest,Hungary).
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3 °C
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70%
- Air changes (per hr): > 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Details on route of administration:
- The route of application was selected in compliance with international guidelines. The oral route is the anticipated route of human exposure to the test item.
- Vehicle:
- other: Sunflower oil (Helianthii annui oleum raffinatum)
- Details on oral exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: The test material was formulated in sunflower oil at in the formulation laboratory of the Test Facility beforehand not longer than for three days before the administration.
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle: The suitability of the vehicle for the test item was analytically verified up front. The test material was stable in sunflower oil at concentrations of 1 mg/mL and 250 mg/mL at room temperature for 1 day and in a refrigerator (at 5 ± 3 °C) for 3 days.
- Concentration in vehicle: 25, 75 and 150 mg/mL
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 4 mL/kg bw
- Lot/batch no.: 1604-4373 and 1607-4569
- Quality: Ph.Hg. VIII - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Analytical control of dosing formulations (control of concentration) was performed twice during the study. Five aliquots of 10 mL of each formulation (25, 75 and 150 mg/mL) and five aliquots of 10 mL control substance (vehicle) were taken and analyzed. The samples were stored at 5 ± 3 °C before the analysis. Concentration of the test item in the dosing formulations varied in the range of 94% to 99% in comparison to the nominal values. The formulation samples were homogenous at both analytical occasions. Recovery of the test material from sunflower oil formulations was 101 and 103% at ~1 and ~250 mg/mL concentrations, respectively. A sufficient stability and homogeneity in the chosen vehicle was verified over the range of relevant concentrations at the appropriate frequency of preparation in a separate analytical report. The test material proved to be stable at room temperature for 1 day (recovery was 97% of starting concentrations at 1 mg/mL and 96% at 250 mg/mL) and at 5 ± 3°C for 3 days (recovery was 99% of starting concentrations at 1 mg/mL and 94% at 250 mg/mL).
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 49 days (males, control and test groups)
55 days (females, control and test groups)
49 days and 14 day post-exposure observation period (recovery groups) - Frequency of treatment:
- once daily at similar time (± 2 h), 7 days/week
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 600 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Treatment period:
Control: 12/sex
100 mg/kg bw/day: 12/sex
300 mg/kg bw/day: 12/sex
600 mg/kg bw/day: 12 females and 13 males
Treatment and recovery period:
Control: 5/sex
600 mg/kg bw/day: 5 females and 4 males - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: The dose levels were chosen on the basis of the results of a preliminary toxicity screening test with the test material in rats. The high was chosen with the aim of inducing toxic effects but no mortality or severe suffering of animals. The low dose was chosen to induce no toxic effect. The mid dose was interpolated geometrically.
- Post-exposure recovery period in satellite groups: 14 days - Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily and once daily
- Cage side observations included: morbidity and mortality (twice daily), general clinical observations on parental animals (once daily)
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: once daily for for animals showing clinical signs at 600 mg/kg bw/day, prior to the first exposure and once weekly thereafter on all animals, weekly during the recovery period
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: on the first day of dosing and weekly thereafter and on the day of necropsy (parental males); on the first day of dosing and weekly thereafter and on gestation days 0, 7, 14 and 21 and on days 0 (within 24 h after parturition), 4 and 13 post-partum (parental females); on day of necropsy (females subjected to organ weighing)
FOOD CONSUMPTION:
The food consumption was determined weekly by reweighing the non-consumed diet during the treatment period except mating phase (pre-mating days 7, 13, gestation days 0, 7, 14 and 21, lactation days 0, 4 and 13). Food consumption of male animals was also determined by weekly interval during post-mating period. The food consumption of animals assigned to the recovery groups were weighed by weekly interval during the treatment and post-treatment observation period.
FOOD EFFICIENCY: No
WATER CONSUMPTION: No
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: on the day of necropsy (control and test groups), at the end of the 14 days post-treatment period (recovery groups)
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: Yes (Isofluran)
- Animals fasted: Yes
- How many animals: 5 males and 5 females randomly selected from each group (control and test groups), all animals (recovery groups)
- Parameters examined: white blood cell (leukocyte) count, red blood cell (erythrocyte) count, hemoglobin concentration, hematocrit (relative volume of erythrocytes), mean corpuscular (erythrocyte) volume, mean corpuscular (erythrocyte) hemoglobin, mean corpuscular (erythrocyte) hemoglobin concentration, platelet (thrombocyte) count, reticulocytes, differential white blood cell count (neutrophil, monocyte, lymphocyte, basophil, eosinophil), blood coagulation (activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time)
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: on the day of necropsy (control and test groups), at the end of the 14 days post-treatment period (recovery groups)
- Animals fasted: Yes
- How many animals: 5 males and 5 females randomly selected from each group (control and test groups), all animals (recovery groups)
- Parameters examined: alanine aminotransferase activity, aspartate aminotransferase activity, total bilirubin concentration, creatinine concentration, urea concentration, glucose concentration, cholesterol concentration, bile acids, sodium concentration, potassium concentration, albumin concentration, total protein concentration
URINALYSIS: No
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: during the last exposure week but before the blood sampling
- Dose groups that were examined: 5 male and 5 female animals randomly selected from each group
- Battery of functions tested: sensory activity / grip strength / motor activity / other: modified Irwin test
IMMUNOLOGY: No
OTHER: Determination of serum levels of thyroid hormones (T4) from all parental male animals at termination on Day 54. - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
Terminally (one day after the last treatment), animals were euthanized by exsanguination after verification of deep narcosis by Isofluran and were subjected to gross necropsy (Parental male animals: after the optionally extended post-mating period on Day 49; Dams not selected for toxicology examinations: on post-partum day 13 or shortly thereafter (Day 55); Dams selected for toxicology examinations: shortly after post-partum day 13 (Day 55); Recovery animals after 14-day post-treatment observation period (Day 63). Examination of the external appearance and the appearance of the tissues and organs. Special attention was paid to the organs of the reproductive system. The number of implantation sites was recorded. The uterus with cervix, vagina, testes, epididymides (total and cauda), prostate, and seminal vesicles with coagulating glands, ovaries of all adult animals were preserved. Testes and epididymides were preserved in modified Davidson solution, all other organs in 4 % buffered formaldehyde solution. Thyroid gland was preserved from all adult males and females and from one male and one female pup per litter for the intended subsequent histopathological examination. Thyroid and parathyroid were preserved together with larynx.
All organs showing macroscopic lesions and the following organs were preserved in 4 % buffered formaldehyde solution (except testes and epididymides; see above) for five male and five female animals randomly selected from each group: adrenal glands, aorta, bone with bone marrow and joint (femur), brain (representative regions: cerebrum, cerebellum and pons and medulla oblongata), eyes (lachrymal gland with Harderian glands), female mammary gland, gonads (testes with epididymides, ovaries, uterus with fallopian tube and vagina), gross lesions, heart, kidneys, large intestines (caecum, colon, rectum, including Peyer’s patches), liver, lungs (with main stem bronchi; inflation with fixative and then immersion), lymph nodes (submandibular, mesenteric), muscle (quadriceps), esophagus, pancreas, pituitary, prostate, salivary glands (submandibular), sciatic nerve, seminal vesicle with coagulating gland, skin, small intestines (representative regions: duodenum, ileum, jejunum), spinal cord (at three levels: cervical, mid-thoracic and lumbar), spleen, sternum, stomach, thymus, thyroid + parathyroid, trachea, urinary bladder.
The following organs of male adults were weighed: brain, testes, epididymides and prostate and seminal vesicles with coagulating glands as a whole. In addition, for 5 males and females randomly selected from each group, and for recovery animals, adrenals, brain, heart, kidneys, liver, spleen and thymus were weighed.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes
Detailed histological examination was performed on the ovaries, uterus, vagina, testes, epididymides, prostate and seminal vesicles with coagulating gland in all animals of control and high dose groups with special emphasis on stages of spermatogenesis in the male gonads and histopathology of interstitial testicular cell structure and on the ovaries covering the follicular, luteal, and interstitial compartments of the ovary, as well as the epithelial capsule and ovarian stroma. Full histopathology examinations were performed on the preserved organs and tissues of the randomly selected animals in the control and high dose (600 mg/kg bw/day) including recovery groups. In addition, stomach was also processed and examined histologically in the low and mid dose groups due to necropsy findings. The fixed tissues were trimmed, processed, embedded in paraffin, sectioned with a microtome, placed on glass microscope slides, stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined by light microscopy. - Statistics:
- The statistical evaluation of appropriate data was performed with the statistical program package SPSS PC+4.0.
The homogeneity of variance between groups was checked by Bartlett’s homogeneity of variance test. Where no significant heterogeneity was detected a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) is carried out. If the obtained result was significant Duncan Multiple Range test was used to access the significance of inter-group differences. Getting significant result at Bartlett’s test, the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance was used and the inter-group comparisons were performed using Mann-Whitney U-test. Chi2 test was performed if feasible. For evaluation of data obtained during the recovery period, the homogeneity of variance between groups was checked by F-test. Depending on the result pooled or separate variance estimate of the Two-Sample t-test was performed. - Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- MALES
300 mg/kg bw/day: salivation (6/12 animals) and nuzzling up the bedding material (12/12 animals) shortly after the daily administration; scar on the skin of the neck during the last week of the treatment period in 1/12 animal
600 mg/kg bw/day: salivation (16/17 animals), nuzzling up the bedding material (17/17 animals), compulsive biting of the bedding material (17/17 animals), prone position (17/17 animals) and closed eyes (17/17 animals) with variable incidence and duration; prone position and closed eye ceased between Day 13 and 24
FEMALES
Control: piloerection and paleness at parturition (1/12 animal)
300 mg/kg bw/day: salivation and nuzzling up the bedding material during the pre-mating (8/12 and 12/12 animals, respectively), gestation (2/12 and 12/12 animals, respectively) and lactation (1/12 and 12/12 animals, respectively) periods
600 mg/kg bw/day: salivation (7/17 animals), nuzzling up the bedding material (17/17 animals), compulsive biting of the bedding material (17/17 animals), prone position (17/17 animals) and closed eyes (17/17 animals) during the pre-mating period (main groups) or during the treatment period (recovery groups); compulsive biting of the bedding material and nuzzling up the bedding material during gestation (12/12 animals) and salivation during gestation and lactation (3/12 and 2/12, respectively) for a short period of time after the treatment; alopecia of the abdomen in 1/12 dam between gestation days 19 and lactation day 8 - Mortality:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- 600 mg/kg bw/day: 1/17 males euthanized
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- MALES
100 mg/kg bw/day: statistical signigicant increased mean body weight gain between Days 7 and 13 (non-treatment related)
600 mg/kg bw/day: statistical signigicant decreased mean body weight gain between Days 34 and 41 and for the whole treatment period (between Days 0 and 48); increased mean body weight gain at each occasion of the recovery period; slightly increased mean body weight during recovery period (not statistically significant)
FEMALES
100 mg/kg bw/day: statistical significant decreased mean body weight gain between Days 7 and 13 (non-treatment related)
300 mg/kg bw/day: statistical significant increased mean body weight gain between Days 0 and 7 (non-treatment related); statistical significant decreased mean body weight gain between Days 7 and 13 (non-treatment related)
600 mg/kg bw/day: statistical significant increased mean body weight gain between Days 0 and 7 (non-treatment related) - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- MALES
600 mg/kg bw/day: statistical significant decreased mean daily food consumption during the entire treatment period with statistical significance during the premating period and last week of the treatment period - Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- MALES
100 mg/kg bw/day: slightly longer activated thromboplastin time (not significant)
600 mg/kg bw/day: statistical significant increased mean white blood cell count and mean percentage of neutrophil granulocytes; statistical significant decreased percentage of lymphocytes
FEMALES
600 mg/kg bw/day: statistical significant increased mean white blood cell count; slightly shorter prothrombin time; statistical significant increased percentage of neutrophil granulocytes and decreased percentage of lymphocytes (both not statistically significant); slightly increased mean white blood cell count at the end of the recovery period - Clinical biochemistry findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- MALES
600 mg/kg bw/day: statistical significant slightly increased mean concentrations of urea and bile acids at the end of the recovery period (not significant)
FEMALES
100 mg/kg bw/day: statistical significant increased mean total protein concentration
600 mg/kg bw/day: statistical significant slightly increased mean cholesterol concentration; statistical significant slightly increased concentrations of total bilirubin, cholesterol and bile acids at the end of the recovery period; statistical significant slightly decreased albumin level at the end of the recovery period - Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- no effects observed
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- MALES
600 mg/kg bw/day: statistical significant decreased mean thymus weight; statistical significant slightly increased liver weight relative to body weight; statistical significant increased thymus weight (absolute and relative to body and brain weights) at the end of the recovery period
FEMALES
100 and 300 mg/kg bw/day: statistical significant slightly decreased mean thymus weights (absolute and relative to body and brain weights)
600 mg/kg bw/day: statistical significant slightly decreased mean thymus weights (absolute and relative to body and brain weights); statistical significant slightly increased weights of liver, spleen and adrenal glands (absolute and relative to body and brain weights for each organ); minor differences in thymus weights; statistical significant slightly increased mean liver weight relative to body weight and slightly decreased mean adrenal glands weight relative to body weight at the end of the recovery period - Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- MALES
300 mg/kg bw/day: thickened mucous membrane in the stomach (6/12 animals); thymic hemorrhage (1/12 animal); scar on the neck (1/12 animal; non-treatment related)
600 mg/kg bw/day: thickened mucous membrane in the stomach in the prematurely euthanized animal; thickened mucous membrane in the stomach (12/12 animals); adhesion of the stomach and liver (1/12 animal); thickened mucous membrane in the stomach at the end of the recovery period (4/4 animals)
FEMALES
Control: thymic hemorrhage (1/12 animal); moderate hydrometra (1/12 animal); slight or marked hydrometra at the end of the recovery period (1/5)
300 mg/kg bw/day: thickened mucous membrane in the stomach (2/12 animals)
600 mg/kg bw/day: thickened mucous membrane in the stomach (12/12 animals); slight hydrometra (1/12 animal); slight or marked hydrometra at the end of the recovery period (2/5) - Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- MALES
Control: alveolar emphysema (minimal degree; 1/5 animal; non-treatment related); hyperplasia of bronchus associated lymphoid tissue (2/5 animals; non-treatment related); hyperplasia of bronchus associated lymphoid tissue at the end of the recovery period (1/5 animal; non-treatment related)
300 mg/kg bw/day: squamous cell hyperplasia in the forestomach (12/12 animals)
600 mg/kg bw/day: serious deep ulceration and necrosis in the forestomach and purulent inflammation in the kidney (purulent nephritis) and brain (purulent leptomeningitis), as well as centrilobular vacuolation in the liver of the prematurely euthanized animal; squamous cell hyperplasia in the forestomach (12/12 animals); ulceration in the forestomach (10/12 animals); hyperplasia of bronchus associated lymphoid tissue at the end of the recovery period (1/4 animal; non-treatment related)
FEMALES
Control: alveolar emphysema (minimal degree; 1/5 animal; non-treatment related); acute hemorrhage in the thymus (1/5 animal; non-treatment related); hyperplasia of bronchus associated lymphoid tissue (1/5 animal; non-treatment related); dilatation of uterine horns (1/12 animal; non-treatment related); dilatation of uterine horns at the end of the recovery period (1/5 animal; non-treatment related); alveolar emphysema at the end of the recovery period (1/5 animal; non-treatment related)
300 mg/kg bw/day: squamous cell hyperplasia in the forestomach (12/12 animals)
600 mg/kg bw/day: squamous cell hyperplasia in the forestomach (12/12 animals); ulceration in the forestomach (10/12 animals); alveolar emphysema (minimal degree; 1/5 animal; non-treatment related); hyperplasia of bronchus associated lymphoid tissue (1/5 animal; non-treatment related); dilatation of uterine horns (1/12 animal; non-treatment related); dilatation of uterine horns at the end of the recovery period (2/5 animals; non-treatment related); hyperplasia of bronchus associated lymphoid tissue at the end of the recovery period(1/5 animal; non-treatment related) - Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no statistically significant differences in the thyroid hormone (free T4) level in parental male animals compared to the control.
- Details on results:
- CLINICAL SIGNS
Dermal changes (scar in 1/12 male of the mid dose group and alopecia in 1/12 female of the high dose group) are common spontaneous finding in this strain of experimental rats and are seen also in untreated rats. These were considered to be individual signs and not related to the test item.
MORTALITY
The male of the high dose group was euthanized due to its moribund condition and subjected to necropsy on Day 9. Nuzzling up the bedding material, compulsive biting of the bedding material, prone position, closed eyes, piloerection, decreased muscle tone, sanguineous fur around the nose and decreased activity were noted for this animal between Days 1 and 9. The body weight of this animal decreased significantly during the first week of study and animal became moribund on Day 9. Histological examinations revealed test item related serious deep ulceration and necrosis in the forestomach accompanied by purulent inflammation in the kidney (purulent nephritis) and brain (purulent leptomeningitis) as well as centrilobular vacuolation in the liver in accordance with necropsy findings (thickened mucous membrane in the stomach).
BODY WEIGHT AND WEIGHT CHANGES
The slight changes in the body weight gain at the low dose in males and at all doses in females had no influence on the mean body weight. These changes were not considered treatment-related.
FOOD CONSUMPTION
The effect on the food consumption in the high dose males was reversible during the recovery period.
CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY FINDINGS
The slight, but statistically significant differences with respect to controls in total protein and cholesterol concentrations in females at 100 and 600 mg/kg bw/day, respectively, were considered to have little or no toxicological importance because all these changes were with low degree, values remained within the historical control ranges or there were no dose relevance. The differences with respect to the control in urea and bile acids in males at the highest dose as well as in total bilirubin and albumin levels in females at the highest dose were detected at the end of the recovery period but not at the termination of the treatment. Moreover, there were no histological alterations to substantiate the relevance of these changes.
GROSS PATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS
Hemorrhage in the thymus in one control female was due to circulatory disturbance developed during exsanguination. Hydrometra in one control females, related to the female sexual cycle, is a frequent observation in experimental rats. In the lack of related histopathological alterations (inflammatory or other pathological lesion) it was judged not to be toxicologically relevant.
Scars on the skin, as observed in 1/12 male at 300 mg/kg bw/day, is a common spontaneous finding in this strain of experimental rats and was considered to be individual sign and not related to the test item.
ORGAN WEIGHT FINDINGS
The differences in thymus weights in high dose females were minor and not related to doses. In the lack of histological changes, thymus weight alterations were not considered to be related to the test item.
All changes in organ weights were not considered to be toxicologically relevant due to the small degree and in the lack of associated histopathological alterations.
HISTOPATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS: NON-NEOPLASTIC
Treatment related findings: The purulent lesions observed in prematurely euthanized male probably were in connection with bacterial infection, which was a consequence of the deep ulceration and necrosis in the forestomach. The centrilobular vacuolation in the liver of this animal could be developed due to inanition during the disease. The development of squamous cell hyperplasia and ulceration was considered to be a consequence of the local effect of the test item. Spontaneous occurrence of erosion or ulceration of the stomach is uncommon in rats. In the animals belonging to the 300 mg/kg bw/day treated groups, the intensity of squamous cell hyperplasia was milder than in the high dose group and ulceration was not detected. In the 100 mg/kg bw/day treated male and female animals the squamous cell hyperplasia and ulceration were not detectable. No histopathological changes were present in the stomach of recovery animals at 600 mg/kg bw/day (male or female) therefore these were considered to be reversible.
Non-treatment related findings: Acute changes in the lungs and thymus in control or high dose treated animals (alveolar emphysema, acute hemorrhage in the thymus) were considered as consequence of hypoxia, dyspnea and circulatory disturbance developed during exsanguinations. Hyperplasia of bronchus associated lymphoid tissue as observed in control animals and high dose treated females is a physiological immune-morphological phenomenon, without toxicological significance. The dilatation of uterine horns observed in control and high dose treated females - without inflammatory or other pathological lesions – is a slight neuro-hormonal phenomenon and was in connection with the normal sexual cycle (pro-estrus phase) of uterus without pathological significance. - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- local effects
- Effect level:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- clinical signs
- gross pathology
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- systemic effects
- Effect level:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- clinical signs
- haematology
- Critical effects observed:
- yes
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- System:
- gastrointestinal tract
- Organ:
- stomach
- Treatment related:
- yes
- Dose response relationship:
- yes
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- The No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for systemic toxicity after oral administration via gavage of the test substance to male and female Hsd.Han: Wistar rats was 300 mg/kg bw/day in both sexes. The NOAEL for local toxicity after oral administration via gavage of the test substance to male and female Hsd.Han: Wistar rats was 100 mg/kg bw/day in both sexes.
Reference
Table 1: Summary of clinical signs in males (pre-mating, mating and post-mating periods)
Observations |
Control |
100 mg/kg bw/day |
300 mg/kg bw/day |
600 mg/kg bw/day |
||
Treatment period* |
Recovery period |
Treatment period* |
Recovery period |
|||
Normal |
17/17 |
5/5 |
12/12 |
0/12 |
0/17 |
4/4 |
Salivation |
0/17 |
0/5 |
0/12 |
6/12 |
16/17 |
0/4 |
Compulsive biting of the bedding material |
0/17 |
0/5 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
17/17 |
0/4 |
Nuzzling up the bedding material |
0/17 |
0/5 |
0/12 |
12/12 |
17/17 |
0/4 |
Prone position |
0/17 |
0/5 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
17/17 |
0/4 |
Closed eyes |
0/17 |
0/5 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
17/17 |
0/4 |
Skin: scar |
0/17 |
0/5 |
0/12 |
1/12 |
0/17 |
0/4 |
Piloerectiona |
0/17 |
0/5 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
1/17 |
0/4 |
Decreased activitya |
0/17 |
0/5 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
1/17 |
0/4 |
Decreased muscle tonea |
0/17 |
0/5 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
1/17 |
0/4 |
Sanguineous fur around the nosea |
0/17 |
0/5 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
1/17 |
0/4 |
Moribund |
0/17 |
0/5 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
1/17 |
0/4 |
One animal of the high dose recovery group was re-located to main group due to early euthanazia of moribund animal.
* Including animals of recovery group
aNoted for moribund animal only
Table 2: Summary of clinical signs in females
Observations |
Control |
100 mg/kg bw/day |
300 mg/kg bw/day |
600 mg/kg bw/day |
Pre-mating and mating periods |
||||
Normal |
12/12 |
12/12 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
Salivation |
0/12 |
0/12 |
8/12 |
6/12 |
Nuzzling up the bedding material |
0/12 |
0/12 |
12/12 |
12/12 |
Compulsive biting of the bedding material |
0/12 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
12/12 |
Prone position |
0/12 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
12/12 |
Closed eyes |
0/12 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
12/12 |
Gestation period |
||||
Normal |
12/12 |
12/12 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
Salivation |
0/12 |
0/12 |
2/12 |
3/12 |
Nuzzling up the bedding material |
0/12 |
0/12 |
12/12 |
12/12 |
Compulsive biting of the bedding material |
0/12 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
12/12 |
Alopecia |
0/12 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
1/12 |
Lactation period |
||||
Normal |
11/12 |
12/12 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
Salivation |
0/12 |
0/12 |
1/12 |
2/12 |
Nuzzling up the bedding material |
0/12 |
0/12 |
12/12 |
12/12 |
Compulsive biting of the bedding material |
0/12 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
12/12 |
Pale |
1/12 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
Piloerection |
1/12 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
Alopecia |
0/12 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
1/12 |
Table 3: Summary of clinical signs in females (recovery)
Observations |
Control |
100 mg/kg bw/day |
300 mg/kg bw/day |
600 mg/kg bw/day |
||
Treatment period* |
Recovery period |
Treatment period* |
Recovery period |
|||
Normal |
5/5 |
5/5 |
- |
- |
0/5 |
5/5 |
Salivation |
0/5 |
0/5 |
- |
- |
1/5 |
0/5 |
Nuzzling up the bedding material |
0/5 |
0/5 |
- |
- |
5/5 |
0/5 |
Compulsive biting of the bedding material |
0/5 |
0/5 |
- |
- |
5/5 |
0/5 |
Prone position |
0/5 |
0/5 |
- |
- |
5/5 |
0/5 |
Closed eyes |
0/5 |
0/5 |
- |
- |
5/5 |
0/5 |
* Including animals of recovery group
- no data
Table 4: Summary of body weight gain in males
Group |
|
Body weight gain (g) between |
|||||||
Pre-mating days |
Mating days |
Post-mating days |
Total |
||||||
0 – 7 |
7 – 13 |
13 – 20 |
20 – 27 |
27 – 34 |
34 – 41 |
41 – 48 |
0 – 48 |
||
Control |
Mean |
29.2 |
16.9 |
19.6 |
21.1 |
18.5 |
14.5 |
14.2 |
134.2 |
SD |
9.4 |
5.0 |
5.4 |
5.3 |
3.7 |
4.3 |
4.0 |
25.3 |
|
n |
17 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
|
100 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
29.8 |
22.5** |
22.0 |
19.5 |
18.7 |
16.3 |
12.1 |
140.8 |
SD |
6.6 |
4.7 |
4.6 |
4.5 |
4.1 |
6.1 |
4.0 |
25.9 |
|
n |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
|
300 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
24.2 |
18.3 |
17.4 |
18.9 |
17.9 |
16.9 |
12.8 |
126.4 |
SD |
6.1 |
4.3 |
8.3 |
6.1 |
4.0 |
7.1 |
4.6 |
21.8 |
|
n |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
|
600 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
11.0** |
10.7* |
17.6 |
19.0 |
18.2 |
8.4** |
10.1 |
97.9** |
SD |
13.1 |
9.4 |
5.6 |
7.1 |
6.0 |
2.8 |
10.5 |
28.4 |
|
n |
17 |
16 |
16 |
16 |
16 |
16 |
16 |
16 |
|
|
U |
U |
NS |
NS |
NS |
U |
NS |
DN |
* p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
NS = Not Significant
U = Mann-Whitney U-test vs. Control
DN = Duncan´s multiple range test
Table 5: Summary of body weight gain in males of the recovery group
Group |
|
Body weight gain (g) between |
||
Recovery days |
||||
0 – 6 |
6 – 13 |
0 – 13 |
||
Control |
Mean |
7.2 |
0.8 |
8.0 |
SD |
4.2 |
1.9 |
5.3 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
600 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
16.0* |
9.8** |
25.8** |
SD |
6.0 |
2.1 |
4.7 |
|
n |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|
|
T |
T |
T |
* p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
T = t-test vs. Control
Table 6: Summary of body weight gain in females
Group |
|
Body weight gain (g) between |
||||||||
Pre-mating days |
Total |
Treatment days |
Total |
|||||||
0 – 7 |
7 – 13 |
0 – 13 |
13 – 20 |
20 – 27 |
27 – 34 |
34 – 41 |
41 – 48 |
0 – 48 |
||
Control |
Mean |
2.6 |
8.4 |
11.0 |
6.8 |
1.8 |
3.2 |
8.2 |
2.0 |
34.8 |
SD |
4.2 |
6.0 |
5.3 |
2.5 |
3.3 |
3.1 |
4.4 |
2.3 |
8.3 |
|
n |
17 |
17 |
17 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
100 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
7.3 |
3.6* |
10.9 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
SD |
9.4 |
4.4 |
10.1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
n |
12 |
12 |
12 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
300 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
7.3* |
3.5* |
10.8 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
SD |
4.8 |
4.7 |
4.1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
n |
12 |
12 |
12 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
600 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
6.8* |
4.8 |
11.5 |
10.8 |
4.0 |
8.2 |
8.4 |
6.6 |
53.6 |
SD |
4.9 |
5.4 |
6.9 |
4.5 |
5.4 |
5.5 |
5.9 |
4.2 |
27.2 |
|
n |
17 |
17 |
17 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
U |
DN |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
* p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
NS = Not Significant
U = Mann-Whitney U-test vs. Control
DN = Duncan´s multiple range test
Table 7: Summary of body weight gain in females of the recovery group
Group |
|
Body weight gain (g) between |
||
Recovery days |
||||
0 – 6 |
6 – 13 |
0 – 13 |
||
Control |
Mean |
0.8 |
2.0 |
2.8 |
SD |
4.7 |
4.8 |
2.9 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
600 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
2.4 |
0.0 |
2.4 |
SD |
7.1 |
6.5 |
4.8 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS = Not Significant
Table 8: Summary of food consumption in males
Group |
|
Daily mean food consumption (g/animal/day) |
||||||||
Pre-mating days |
Post-mating days |
Recovery period |
||||||||
0 – 7 |
7 – 13 |
20 – 27 |
27 – 34 |
34 – 41 |
41 – 48 |
Day 0 – 6 |
Day 6 – 13 |
|||
Control |
Mean |
23.1 |
23.4 |
21.9 |
21.9 |
22.4 |
22.7 |
23.9 |
26.2 |
|
SD |
1.6 |
1.2 |
2.2 |
2.0 |
1.9 |
2.3 |
1.9 |
2.4 |
||
n |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
2 |
2 |
||
100 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
22.6 |
24.1 |
22.3 |
21.9 |
22.4 |
21.5 |
- |
- |
|
SD |
0.9 |
1.2 |
1.8 |
1.5 |
2.0 |
1.5 |
- |
- |
||
n |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
- |
- |
||
±% |
-2 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
-5 |
- |
- |
||
300 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
21.8 |
22.3 |
21.8 |
21.6 |
22.4 |
21.9 |
- |
- |
|
SD |
1.2 |
0.6 |
1.0 |
1.2 |
1.5 |
1.7 |
- |
- |
||
n |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
- |
- |
||
±% |
-6 |
-5 |
0 |
-2 |
0 |
-4 |
- |
- |
||
600 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
18.7** |
19.3** |
21.4 |
20.7 |
20.6 |
19.7** |
24.5 |
23.4 |
|
SD |
1.6 |
2.1 |
2.4 |
2.5 |
1.6 |
1.5 |
0.5 |
3.9 |
||
n |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
2 |
2 |
||
±% |
-19 |
-18 |
-2 |
-6 |
-8 |
-13 |
3 |
-11 |
||
|
|
DN |
DN |
NS |
NS |
DN |
NS |
NS |
||
**p < 0.01
NS = Not Significant
DN = Duncan´s multiple range test
Table 9: Summary of hematology
Group |
|
White blood cell count [×10E9/L] |
Neutrophil [%] |
Lymphocyte [%] |
Prothrombin time [sec] |
Activated partial thromboplastin time [sec] |
MALES – TREATMENT PERIOD |
||||||
Control |
Mean |
9.39 |
18.56 |
77.68 |
20.30 |
21.30 |
SD |
2.46 |
4.02 |
3.60 |
1.81 |
1.24 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
100 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
8.99 |
20.32 |
75.36 |
22.94 |
24.64* |
SD |
1.68 |
6.74 |
7.03 |
0.99 |
2.09 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
-4 |
9 |
-3 |
13 |
16 |
|
300 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
9.83 |
21.66 |
74.10 |
21.78 |
23.46 |
SD |
1.19 |
8.11 |
9.04 |
1.92 |
2.70 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
5 |
17 |
-5 |
7 |
10 |
|
600 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
13.33* |
39.50** |
55.60** |
22.12 |
22.34 |
SD |
2.55 |
4.09 |
5.08 |
1.60 |
1.00 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
42 |
113 |
-28 |
9 |
5 |
|
|
DN |
DN |
DN |
NS |
DN |
|
MALES – RECOVERY PERIOD |
||||||
Control |
Mean |
9.37 |
19.30 |
75.00 |
22.10 |
20.25 |
SD |
1.19 |
3.49 |
3.87 |
1.49 |
1.59 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
|
600 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
11.00 |
20.45 |
73.70 |
23.78 |
22.65 |
SD |
2.39 |
5.97 |
6.52 |
0.99 |
1.52 |
|
n |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|
±% |
17 |
6 |
-2 |
8 |
12 |
|
|
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
|
FEMALES – TREATMENT PERIOD |
||||||
Control |
Mean |
5.00 |
32.14 |
63.82 |
21.98 |
19.26 |
SD |
1.81 |
19.16 |
21.56 |
1.61 |
0.98 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
100 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
5.26 |
26.40 |
70.14 |
21.42 |
19.48 |
SD |
0.94 |
12.80 |
12.49 |
1.33 |
1.19 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
5 |
-18 |
10 |
-3 |
1 |
|
300 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
4.60 |
24.60 |
72.36 |
22.68 |
20.48 |
SD |
1.01 |
7.24 |
7.22 |
1.59 |
1.39 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
-8 |
-23 |
13 |
3 |
6 |
|
600 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
8.84** |
41.82 |
54.72 |
17.66* |
17.96 |
SD |
2.68 |
3.72 |
4.45 |
4.91 |
2.95 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
77 |
30 |
-14 |
-20 |
-7 |
|
|
DN |
NS |
NS |
U |
NS |
|
FEMALES – RECOVERY PERIOD |
||||||
Control |
Mean |
5.67 |
19.44 |
75.82 |
22.32 |
22.50 |
SD |
0.54 |
4.27 |
4.48 |
0.50 |
1.47 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
600 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
7.32* |
17.74 |
76.36 |
21.24 |
20.80 |
SD |
1.29 |
5.28 |
5.51 |
1.35 |
0.83 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
29 |
-9 |
1 |
-5 |
-8 |
|
|
* |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
* p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
NS = Not Significant
U = Mann-Whitney U-test vs. Control
DN = Duncan´s multiple range test
Table 10: Summary of necropsy findings
Organs |
Observations |
Frequency of observations per group |
||||||
Control |
100 mg/kg bw/day |
300 mg/kg bw/day |
600 mg/kg bw/day |
|||||
Main group |
Recovery group |
|
|
Main group - survivors |
Main group - moribund |
Recovery group |
||
MALES |
||||||||
|
No macroscopic finding |
12/12 |
5/5 |
12/12 |
4/12 |
0/12 |
0/1 |
0/4 |
Stomach |
Thickened mucous membrane |
0/12 |
0/5 |
0/12 |
6/12 |
12/12 |
1/1 |
4/4 |
Adhesion to liver |
0/12 |
0/5 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
1/12 |
0/1 |
0/4 |
|
Thymus |
Hemorrhages |
0/12 |
0/5 |
0/12 |
1/12 |
0/12 |
0/1 |
0/4 |
Skin |
Scar |
0/12 |
0/5 |
0/12 |
1/12 |
0/12 |
0/1 |
0/4 |
FEMALES |
||||||||
|
No macroscopic finding |
11/12 |
4/5 |
12/12 |
10/12 |
0/12 |
NA |
3/5 |
Stomach |
Thickened mucous membrane |
0/12 |
0/5 |
0/12 |
2/12 |
12/12 |
NA |
0/5 |
Thymus |
Hemorrhages |
1/12 |
0/5 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
NA |
0/5 |
Uterus |
Hydrometra |
1/12 |
1/5 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
1/12 |
NA |
2/5 |
Frequency of observation =number of animals with observations / number of animals examined
NA = not applicable
Table 11: Summary of organ weights of males
MALES – MAIN GROUP |
||||||
|
|
Body weight [g] |
Organ weight [g] |
|||
Group |
|
|
Liver |
Thymus |
Spleen |
Adrenal glands |
Control |
Mean |
386.1 |
9.96 |
0.43 |
0.63 |
0.077 |
SD |
33.94 |
0.89 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.012 |
|
n |
12 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
100 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
402.4 |
2.27 |
0.46 |
0.63 |
0.076 |
SD |
37.96 |
0.32 |
0.14 |
0.10 |
0.010 |
|
n |
12 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
4 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
-2 |
|
300 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
387.5 |
2.41 |
0.43 |
0.70 |
0.077 |
SD |
29.46 |
0.26 |
0.09 |
0.06 |
0.009 |
|
n |
12 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
0 |
6 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
|
600 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
354.0* |
2.26 |
0.30* |
0.67 |
0.077 |
SD |
40.18 |
0.14 |
0.05 |
0.07 |
0.013 |
|
n |
12 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
-8 |
-1 |
-29 |
6 |
0 |
|
|
DN |
NS |
DN |
NS |
NS |
|
MALES – RECOVERY GROUP |
||||||
|
|
Body weight [g] |
Organ weight [g] |
|||
Group |
|
|
Liver |
Thymus |
Spleen |
Adrenal glands |
Control |
Mean |
433.8 |
11.68 |
0.37 |
0.74 |
0.081 |
SD |
28.99 |
1.78 |
0.04 |
0.12 |
0.010 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
600 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
400.8 |
10.54 |
0.44* |
0.68 |
0.072 |
SD |
23.26 |
0.75 |
0.03 |
0.13 |
0.017 |
|
n |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|
±% |
-8 |
-10 |
18 |
-8 |
-11 |
|
|
NS |
NS |
* |
NS |
NS |
|
MALES – MAIN GROUP |
||||||
|
|
|
Organ weight relative to body weight [%] |
|||
Group |
|
|
Liver |
Thymus |
Spleen |
Adrenal glands |
Control |
Mean |
NA |
2.519 |
0.109 |
0.161 |
0.020 |
SD |
NA |
0.074 |
0.023 |
0.025 |
0.004 |
|
n |
NA |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
100 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
NA |
2.545 |
0.118 |
0.163 |
0.020 |
SD |
NA |
0.148 |
0.032 |
0.027 |
0.002 |
|
n |
NA |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
NA |
1 |
8 |
1 |
-1 |
|
300 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
NA |
2.638 |
0.109 |
0.180 |
0.020 |
SD |
NA |
0.172 |
0.026 |
0.022 |
0.001 |
|
n |
NA |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
NA |
5 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
|
600 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
NA |
2.861** |
0.083 |
0.187 |
0.021 |
SD |
NA |
0.111 |
0.013 |
0.035 |
0.003 |
|
n |
NA |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
NA |
14 |
-24 |
16 |
7 |
|
|
|
DN |
NS |
NS |
NS |
|
MALES – RECOVERY GROUP |
||||||
|
|
|
Organ weight relative to body weight [%] |
|||
Group |
|
|
Liver |
Thymus |
Spleen |
Adrenal glands |
Control |
Mean |
NA |
2.694 |
0.086 |
0.170 |
0.0188 |
SD |
NA |
0.379 |
0.011 |
0.024 |
0.0023 |
|
n |
NA |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
600 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
NA |
2.631 |
0.109** |
0.168 |
0.0181 |
SD |
NA |
0.138 |
0.005 |
0.030 |
0.0045 |
|
n |
NA |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|
±% |
NA |
-2 |
27 |
-1 |
-4 |
|
|
|
NS |
** |
NS |
NS |
|
MALES – MAIN GROUP |
||||||
|
|
Body weight relative to brain weight [%] |
Organ weight relative to brain weight [%] |
|||
Group |
|
|
Liver |
Thymus |
Spleen |
Adrenal glands |
Control |
Mean |
18489.8 |
477.27 |
20.33 |
30.19 |
3.68 |
SD |
1862.54 |
50.70 |
2.52 |
1.85 |
0.45 |
|
n |
12 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
100 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
19297.8 |
466.17 |
21.75 |
29.95 |
3.57 |
SD |
2093.34 |
47.69 |
6.88 |
6.16 |
0.34 |
|
n |
12 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
4 |
-2 |
7 |
-1 |
-3 |
|
300 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
18597.0 |
489.87 |
20.21 |
33.31 |
3.66 |
SD |
1177.17 |
44.17 |
4.17 |
3.06 |
0.39 |
|
n |
12 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
1 |
3 |
-1 |
10 |
-1 |
|
600 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
17266.1 |
499.26 |
14.40 |
32.09 |
3.67 |
SD |
1634.65 |
63.52 |
1.99 |
3.48 |
0.50 |
|
n |
12 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
-7 |
5 |
-29 |
6 |
0 |
|
|
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
|
MALES – RECOVERY GROUP |
||||||
|
|
Body weight relative to brain weight [%] |
Organ weight relative to brain weight [%] |
|||
Group |
|
|
Liver |
Thymus |
Spleen |
Adrenal glands |
Control |
Mean |
19765.2 |
532.95 |
16.85 |
33.47 |
3.71 |
SD |
1437.51 |
90.11 |
1.81 |
4.87 |
0.44 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
600 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
18984.2 |
498.58 |
20.63* |
31.89 |
3.42 |
SD |
1026.01 |
11.25 |
1.85 |
5.66 |
0.79 |
|
n |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|
±% |
-4 |
-6 |
22 |
-5 |
-8 |
|
|
NS |
NS |
* |
NS |
NS |
* p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
NS = Not Significant
DN = Duncan´s multiple range test
NA = Not Applicable
Table 12: Summary of organ weights of females
FEMALES – MAIN GROUP |
||||||
|
|
Body weight [g] |
Organ weight [g] |
|||
Group |
|
|
Liver |
Thymus |
Spleen |
Adrenal glands |
Control |
Mean |
240.2 |
8.39 |
0.31 |
0.53 |
0.077 |
SD |
15.63 |
0.58 |
0.04 |
0.07 |
0.012 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
100 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
244.2 |
9.04 |
0.24* |
0.64 |
0.079 |
SD |
12.76 |
0.76 |
0.05 |
0.08 |
0.016 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
2 |
8 |
-22 |
20 |
2 |
|
300 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
245.0 |
8.72 |
0.21** |
0.56 |
0.083 |
SD |
14.98 |
0.93 |
0.04 |
0.07 |
0.022 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
2 |
4 |
-30 |
5 |
7 |
|
600 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
240.4 |
9.89* |
0.23* |
0.70** |
0.109** |
SD |
5.86 |
0.90 |
0.04 |
0.11 |
0.009 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
0 |
18 |
-26 |
32 |
41 |
|
|
NS |
DN |
DN |
DN |
DN |
|
FEMALES – RECOVERY GROUP |
||||||
|
|
Body weight [g] |
Organ weight [g] |
|||
Group |
|
|
Liver |
Thymus |
Spleen |
Adrenal glands |
Control |
Mean |
244.6 |
7.30 |
0.34 |
0.51 |
0.086 |
SD |
18.16 |
0.65 |
0.03 |
0.08 |
0.018 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
600 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
260.0 |
8.50 |
0.31 |
0.58 |
0.073 |
SD |
34.20 |
1.54 |
0.08 |
0.10 |
0.012 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
6 |
16 |
-9 |
15 |
-15 |
|
|
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
|
FEMALES – MAIN GROUP |
||||||
|
|
|
Organ weight relative to body weight [%] |
|||
Group |
|
|
Liver |
Thymus |
Spleen |
Adrenal glands |
Control |
Mean |
NA |
3.497 |
0.128 |
0.22 |
0.0322 |
SD |
NA |
0.225 |
0.020 |
0.037 |
0.0039 |
|
n |
NA |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
100 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
NA |
3.700 |
0.098* |
0.261 |
0.0323 |
SD |
NA |
0.175 |
0.019 |
0.027 |
0.0060 |
|
n |
NA |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
NA |
6 |
-24 |
18 |
1 |
|
300 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
NA |
3.557 |
0.087** |
0.226 |
0.0336 |
SD |
NA |
0.282 |
0.015 |
0.017 |
0.0068 |
|
n |
NA |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
NA |
2 |
-32 |
2 |
4 |
|
600 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
NA |
4.113** |
0.094* |
0.290** |
0.0453** |
SD |
NA |
0.315 |
0.017 |
0.043 |
0.0030 |
|
n |
NA |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
NA |
18 |
-27 |
31 |
41 |
|
|
|
DN |
DN |
DN |
DN |
|
FEMALES – RECOVERY GROUP |
||||||
|
|
|
Organ weight relative to body weight [%] |
|||
Group |
|
|
Liver |
Thymus |
Spleen |
Adrenal glands |
Control |
Mean |
NA |
2.985 |
0.139 |
0.208 |
0.0351 |
SD |
NA |
0.175 |
0.013 |
0.037 |
0.0059 |
|
n |
NA |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
600 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
NA |
3.258* |
0.122 |
0.224 |
0.0280* |
SD |
NA |
0.190 |
0.040 |
0.024 |
0.0032 |
|
n |
NA |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
NA |
9 |
-12 |
8 |
-20 |
|
|
|
* |
NS |
NS |
* |
|
FEMALES – MAIN GROUP |
||||||
|
|
Body weight relative to brain weight [%] |
Organ weight relative to brain weight [%] |
|||
Group |
|
|
Liver |
Thymus |
Spleen |
Adrenal glands |
Control |
Mean |
12217.7 |
426.56 |
15.58 |
27.07 |
3.94 |
SD |
670.13 |
23.66 |
1.99 |
4.52 |
0.64 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
100 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
12460.5 |
461.21 |
43.80 |
32.46 |
4.00 |
SD |
650.10 |
34.91 |
3.52 |
3.15 |
0.62 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
2 |
8 |
1 |
20 |
2 |
|
300 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
12309.8 |
438.67 |
43.56 |
27.93 |
4.15 |
SD |
568.78 |
48.81 |
6.67 |
3.24 |
0.99 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
1 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
|
600 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
12954.2 |
532.84** |
45.80 |
37.46** |
5.88** |
SD |
607.70 |
48.28 |
3.06 |
4.63 |
0.55 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
6 |
25 |
6 |
38 |
49 |
|
|
NS |
DN |
NS |
DN |
DN |
|
FEMALES – RECOVERY GROUP |
||||||
|
|
Body weight relative to brain weight [%] |
Organ weight relative to brain weight [%] |
|||
Group |
|
|
Liver |
Thymus |
Spleen |
Adrenal glands |
Control |
Mean |
12557.0 |
374.60 |
17.49 |
26.03 |
4.41 |
SD |
754.69 |
26.79 |
1.85 |
4.49 |
0.84 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
600 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
13902.4 |
455.15 |
16.63 |
31.15 |
3.90 |
SD |
1803.32 |
85.56 |
4.30 |
4.94 |
0.62 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
±% |
11 |
22 |
-5 |
20 |
-12 |
|
|
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
* p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
NS = Not Significant
DN = Duncan´s multiple range test
NA = Not Applicable
Table 13: Summary of histopathological findings
Organs |
Observations |
Incidence of observations per group |
||||||
Control |
100 mg/kg bw/day |
300 mg/kg bw/day |
600 mg/kg bw/day |
|||||
Main group |
Recovery group |
|
|
Main group - survivors |
Main group - moribund |
Recovery group |
||
MALES |
||||||||
Brain |
Purulent leptomeningitis |
0/5 |
0/5 |
/ |
/ |
0/5 |
1/1 |
0/4 |
Epididymides |
Storage of mature spermatozoa |
12/12 |
5/5 |
/ |
/ |
12/12 |
1/1 |
4/4 |
Kidneys |
Purulent nephritis |
0/5 |
0/5 |
/ |
/ |
0/5 |
1/1 |
0/4 |
Liver |
Centrilobular vacuolation |
0/5 |
0/5 |
/ |
/ |
0/5 |
1/1 |
0/4 |
Lungs |
Alveolar emphysema |
1/5 |
0/5 |
/ |
/ |
0/5 |
0/1 |
0/4 |
Hyperplasia of BALT |
2/5 |
1/5 |
/ |
/ |
0/5 |
0/1 |
1/4 |
|
Stomach - forestomach |
Squamous cell hyperplasia |
0/12 |
0/5 |
0/12 |
12/12 |
12/12 |
1/1 |
0/4 |
Ulceration |
0/12 |
0/5 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
10/12 |
1/1 |
0/4 |
|
FEMALES |
||||||||
Lungs |
Alveolar emphysema |
1/5 |
1/5 |
/ |
/ |
1/5 |
NA |
0/5 |
Hyperplasia of BALT |
2/5 |
1/5 |
/ |
/ |
1/5 |
NA |
1/5 |
|
Stomach - forestomach |
Squamous cell hyperplasia |
0/12 |
0/5 |
0/12 |
12/12 |
12/12 |
NA |
0/5 |
Ulceration |
0/12 |
0/5 |
0/12 |
0/12 |
10/12 |
NA |
0/5 |
|
Thymus |
Acute hemorrhage |
1/12 |
0/5 |
/ |
/ |
0/5 |
NA |
0/5 |
Uterus |
Dilatation |
1/12 |
1/5 |
/ |
/ |
1/12 |
NA |
2/5 |
Incidence of observation =number of animals with observations / number of animals examined
/ = not examined
BALT = bronchus associated lymphoid tissue
NA = not applicable
Table 14: Summary of litter weight and litter weight gain of offspring
Group |
|
Litter weight (g) on post-natal days |
Litter weight gain (g) between post-natal days |
||||
0 |
4 |
13 |
0 - 4 |
4 - 13 |
0 - 13 |
||
Control |
Mean |
57.6 |
108.9 |
232.0 |
51.3 |
147.6 |
187.5 |
SD |
11.6 |
14.7 |
18.6 |
11.7 |
15.9 |
19.8 |
|
n |
11 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
|
100 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
65.1 |
114.9 |
231.2 |
50.2 |
146.3 |
184.3 |
SD |
13.3 |
22.6 |
51.8 |
11.9 |
32.1 |
42.3 |
|
n |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
|
300 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
63.3 |
104.7 |
230.4 |
44.2 |
145.4 |
181.6 |
SD |
11.2 |
16.3 |
10.8 |
5.5 |
9.4 |
9.9 |
|
n |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
|
600 mg/kg bw/day |
Mean |
58.0 |
92.7 |
184.9** |
35.2** |
115.6** |
141.7** |
SD |
15.7 |
27.0 |
41.6 |
12.1 |
31.6 |
36.9 |
|
n |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
|
|
NS |
NS |
U |
DN |
U |
U |
* p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
NS = Not Significant
DN = Duncan´s multiple range test
U = Mann-Whitney U-test vs. Control
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 300 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- The available information comprises adequate, reliable (Klimisch score 1) and consistent studies, and is thus sufficient to fulfil the standard information requirements set out in Annex VIII-IX, 8.6, of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
A reliable screening study regarding repeated dose toxicity is available for the test substance.
The potential toxicity of the test substance was assessed in a combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproductive/developmental toxicity screening test in Hsd.Han: Wistar rats performed according to OECD Guideline 422 and in compliance with GLP. Three groups of 12 male and 12 female rats received the test substance in sunflower oil as vehicle at doses of 100, 300 or 600 mg/kg bw/day orally via gavage. A control group of 12 animals/sex received the vehicle only. In addition, 5 animals/sex were added to the control and high dose group to assess the reversibility of any effects observed at the high dose level (recovery group). All animals were dosed prior to mating (14 days) and throughout mating. In addition, males received the test item or vehicle after mating up to the day before necropsy (altogether for 49 days). Females were additionally exposed through the gestation period and up to lactation days 13 - 19, i.e. up to the day before necropsy (altogether for 55 days). Observations and examinations included mortality, clinical signs, food consumption and body weight. Blood samples were collected for determination of serum levels of thyroid hormones (T4) from all parent male animals at termination. Five dams and the male mating partners were randomly selected from each group to examine further signs of toxicity such as functional observations, blood analysis (hematology and clinical chemistry), gross necropsy, organ weighing and histopathology. Animals allocated to the recovery group were observed for additional 14 days after termination of treatment and subjected to clinical pathology and gross pathology examinations, organ weighing and full histological examinations.
At the lowest dose (100 mg/kg bw/day) no treatment-related changes in any of the parameters were observed.
An oral dose of 300 mg/kg bw/day induced clinical signs (salivation and nuzzling up the bedding material) as well as pathological changes in the forestomach (thickened mucous membrane, squamous cell hyperplasia). Mortality, body weight, food consumption, hematology and clinical chemistry parameters were not affected at this dose. Functional observation battery did not demonstrate any treatment-related alterations. The absolute and relative weights of examined organs did not demonstrate any test item related adverse alterations.
Premature death of one male animal occurred at the highest dose (600 mg/kg bw/day). Clinical signs (salivation, nuzzling up and compulsive biting of the bedding material, prone position, closed eyes), slightly reduced body weight gain, decreased food consumption, changes in white blood cell parameters as well as lesions in the stomach (thickened mucous membrane; adhesion to the liver) were observed in surviving animals at 600 mg/kg bw/day. The lesions in the stomach were persistent in male rats until the end of the recovery period. Histopathological alterations in the forestomach in both sexes at 600 mg/kg bw/day (ulceration, necrosis or squamous cell hyperplasia) were reversible as no pathological changes were observed in the recovery groups. Since the (fore)stomach represents the first site of contact test substance related effects might be reduced to local effects. Clinical signs, reduced body weights, decreased food consumption and changes in the white blood cell count might be secondary to the observed local effects. There were no test item related changes in organ weights and clinical chemistry parameters. The T4 serum levels were similar between control and treatment groups. Thus, under the conditions of this study, the systemic NOAEL of the test substance following oral administration via gavage for 49 days (males) or 55 days (females) is 300 mg/kg bw/day in male and female Wistar rats. Due to the local findings in the stomach and in the forestomach a local NOAEL of 100 mg/kg bw/day was derived.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available data on oral repeated dose toxicity do not meet the criteria for classification according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, and is therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
