Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 700-748-4 | CAS number: 1226911-69-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Vapour pressure
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- vapour pressure
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- experimental dates: 08-24 January 2013
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- The study was conducted according to an internationally recognised method, and under GLP. No deviation was reported. The substance is adequately characterised. Therefore full validation applies.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 104 (Vapour Pressure Curve)
- Version / remarks:
- 23 March 2006
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method A.4 (Vapour Pressure)
- Version / remarks:
- Regulation (EC) No 440/2008
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- UK GLP compliance programme (inspected on 10 July 2012 / signed on 30 November 2012)
- Type of method:
- gas saturation method
- Key result
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 0.14 Pa
- Conclusions:
- Low volatility (based on volatility bands criteria for occupational exposure (Chesar / ECETOC TRA), << 500 Pa).
- Executive summary:
The vapour pressure of the test substance was measured under GLP according to OECD 104 / EU A4 guideline, gas saturation method. Determinations were conducted at 30, 40 and 50 °C, with three flow rates per temperature. Mass of evaporated test item was quantified by GC. Vapor pressure at 25 °C was calculated by extrapolation of ln vapor pressure versus the reciprocal of test temperature (K).
The vapor pressure of the test item has been determined to be 0.140 Pa at 25 °C.
- Endpoint:
- vapour pressure
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- No data
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- The study was conducted according to an internationally recognised method. The test substance is adequately characterised. Validation applies with restrictions due to distant extrapolation, leading to inaccuracy.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 104 (Vapour Pressure Curve)
- Version / remarks:
- 23rd March 2006
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method A.4 (Vapour Pressure)
- Version / remarks:
- Regulation (EC) No 440/2008
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- dynamic method
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 0.11 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- extrapolated value
- Conclusions:
- (extrapolated) Low volatility.
- Executive summary:
The vapour pressure of the test substance was measured according to OECD 104/EU A4 guideline, dynamic method.
The result at 25 °C was extrapolated from the regression based on a series of 7 measurements between 28 and 88 hPa, corresponding to 170 to 197°C.
The vapour pressure was extrapolated to be 0.0011 hPa (0.11 Pa) at 25 °C.
Referenceopen allclose all
Average of vapour pressure (mean of three determinations (three flow rates)):
0.242 Pa at 30°C
0.732 Pa at 40°C
1.91 Pa at 50°C
Detailed data, the vapour pressure curve and the regression parameters are provided in the experimental report.
Validation
The linearity of the detector response with respect to concentration was assessed over the concentration range of 5.10 to 20.4 mg/L. This was satisfactory with a correlation coefficient of 1.000 being obtained.
Discussion
To ensure saturation control, three different flow rates were used at each temperature. From the data, it can be clearly seen that higher flow rates did not lead to lower vapor pressures, which means that the nitrogen was saturated with test item under the conditions of the test.
Temperature (°C) | Pressure (hPa) |
170.3 | 28.0 |
177.4 | 36.6 |
183.1 | 46.0 |
185.2 | 52.8 |
190.2 | 67.7 |
194.5 | 75.4 |
197.0 | 87.9 |
An extrapolation was made using an non-linear regression with the measuring points according to the permutation matrix of Fremann-Carrol and by Antoine equation to obtain the vapor pressure at 25 °C.
After the regression the following parameters were:
P(T) = 10{ A - [B/(t+C)] }(mmHg); P(T) = (1013/760)*10{ A - [B/(t+C)] }(hPa)
A = 9.0410; B = 3090.729; C = 230.000; T =Temperature, °C
The boiling temperature could not be measured, because decomposition was observed by DTA from 230°C. The extrapolated bp value is 271.7°C.
Description of key information
Low volatility.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Vapour pressure:
- 0.14 Pa
- at the temperature of:
- 25 °C
Additional information
Two reliable experimental studies, conducted according to a recognized OECD/EC method, are available:
- the Harlan study was conducted under GLP, with the gas saturation method, allowing a temperature range very close to ambient (30-50°C);
- the Firmenich study was performed non-GLP, with the dynamic method in a working range of 170 to 197°C.
Despite distant extrapolation in the Firmenich study, both results are 25°C were found very consistent, with 0.14 and 0.11 Pa for Harlan and Firmenich studies, respectively.
However, the gas saturation study was prefered, and considered as key. Its result is retained as key data
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.