Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 812-244-2 | CAS number: 957209-18-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 016
- Report date:
- 2016
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Version / remarks:
- 2013
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The incubation time after the test item removal was 16 minutes too short. Since the positive and negative control met the acceptance criteria, this does not affect the study results.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2,3,3,4,4-pentafluoro-2,5-bis(1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropan-2-yl)-5-methoxyoxolane
- EC Number:
- 812-244-2
- Cas Number:
- 957209-18-6
- Molecular formula:
- C11H3F19O2
- IUPAC Name:
- 2,3,3,4,4-pentafluoro-2,5-bis(1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropan-2-yl)-5-methoxyoxolane
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: Lot # 20003, unit 0022
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 30 March, 2018
- Purity test date: 30 March, 2016
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature.
TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Treatment of test material prior to testing: None
FORM AS APPLIED IN THE TEST: Undilluted
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- cattle
- Strain:
- other: Not specified.
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- SOURCE OF COLLECTED EYES
- Source: Vitelco's, Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
- Number of animals: Not specified
- Characteristics of donor animals: Young
- Storage, temperature and transport conditions of ocular tissue: Eyes were collected and transported in physiological saline suitable container under cooled conditions as soon as possible after slaughter.
- Time interval prior to initiating testing: Not specified.
- indication of any existing defects or lesions in ocular tissue samples: Eyes were checked for unacceptable defects such as opacity, scratches, pigmentation and neovascularization. Those exhibiting defects were discarded.
- Indication of any antibiotics used: Not specified.
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 750 uL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 10 minutes
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- 120 minutes
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- SELECTION AND PREPARATION OF CORNEAS: Eyes were checked for unacceptable defects such as opacity, scratches, pigmentation and neovascularization. Those exhibiting defects were discarded. The isolated corneas were stored in a petri dish with cMEM containing 1% (v/v) L-glutamine and 1% (v/v) Fetal Bovine Serum. The isolated corneas were mounted in a corneal holder of BASF with the endothelial side against the O-ring of the posterior half of the holder. The anterior half of the holder was positioned on top of the cornea and tightened with screws. The compartments of the corneal holder were filled with cMEM. The corneas were incubated for a minimum of 1 hour at 32 C.
QUALITY CHECK OF THE ISOLATED CORNEAS: After the incubation period, the medium was removed from both compartments and replaced with fresh cMEM. Opacity determinations were performed on each of the corneas using an opacitometer. The opacity of each cornea was read against a cMEM filled chamber, and the initial opacity reading was recorded. Corneas that had an inital opacity reading higher than 7 were not used. Three corneas were selected at random for each treatment group.
NUMBER OF REPLICATES: 3
NEGATIVE CONTROL USED: Physiological saline
POSITIVE CONTROL USED: Ethanol
APPLICATION DOSE AND EXPOSURE TIME: 750 uL for 10 minutes.
TREATMENT METHOD: closed chamber
POST-INCUBATION PERIOD: No
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Number of washing steps after exposure period: 2
- POST-EXPOSURE INCUBATION: 120 minutes
METHODS FOR MEASURED ENDPOINTS:
- Corneal opacity: Measured by diminution of light passing through the cornea.
- Corneal permeability: passage of sodium fluorescein dye measured with the aid of microtiter plate reader (OD490)
SCORING SYSTEM: In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS)
DECISION CRITERIA: please specify if the decision criteria as indicated in the TG was used: Yes, decisions criteria as indicated in the TG were utilized.
Results and discussion
In vitro
Results
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Run / experiment:
- Mean
- Value:
- ca. -0.4
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: Yes
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: Yes
In vivo
- Other effects:
- The corneas treated with the test article showed opacity values ranging from -0.5 to -0.1 and permeability values ranging from -0.001 to 0.007. The corneas were clear after the 10 minutes of treatment with the test article. No pH effects of the test article were observe on the rinsing medium. The in vitro irritancy scores ranged from -0.5 to 0.0 after 10 minutes of treatment with the test article.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Based on the results of the study, the test article is not an ocular irritant.
- Executive summary:
The ocular irritation potential of the test article was evaluated in the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability test (BCOP test). The study was conducted according to OECD 437 (2013) in compliance with OECD GLP (1997). The test article was applied unchanged (750 uL) directly on top of the corneas (n=3). Negative controls (physiological saline) and positive controls (ethanol) were tested concurrently. The controls were within historical laboratory ranges indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the test system functioned properly. The test article did not induce ocular irritation through either endpoint, resulting in a mean in vitro irritancy score of -0.4 after 10 minutes of exposure. Based on the results of the study, the test article is not an ocular irritant.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
