Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation, other
Remarks:
in silico assessment
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
December 2016
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
According to ECHA guidance R7a, available information, QSARs and in chemico/in vitro testing should be considered in a weight of evidence approach before in vivo testing as a last resort. The in silico DEREK assessment, the in chemico DPRA and the in vitro KeratinoSens assay are considered to give a reliable result for prediction of skin sensitization as the DEREK covers the whole process in the in silico assessment (including obvious metabolism) and the first steps of skin sensitization are covered in the DPRA and KeratinoSens assays.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2016
Report date:
2016

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
A DEREK assessment was performed.
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
QSAR not under GLP
Type of study:
other: QSARs and in chemico/in vitro testing should be considered in a weight of evidence approach before in vivo testing as a last resort. The in silico DEREK assessment covers the whole process in the in silico assessment (including obvious metabolism)
Justification for non-LLNA method:
The result is adequate to be used in a weight-of-evidence approach together with in chemico/in vitro studies to complete the endpoint skin sensitisation.
Since 11 October 2016 it is legally required to consider all available information for the endpoint skin sensitisation and to use a non in vivo test strategy based on in chemico, in silico and in vitro skin tests combined with a WoE. An in vivo test (LLNA) is only allowed as last resort.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-(acetylamino)-N-benzyl-3-methoxypropanamide
EC Number:
700-539-8
Cas Number:
175481-26-2
Molecular formula:
C13H18N2O3
IUPAC Name:
2-(acetylamino)-N-benzyl-3-methoxypropanamide
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Details on test material:
- Appearance: White powder
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SMILES: COCC(NC(C)=O)C(=O)NCC1=CC=CC=C1

Results and discussion

In vitro / in chemico

Results
Key result
Parameter:
other: prediction skin sensitisation
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Remarks:
DEREK predicted the substance to be not skin sensitising

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
DEREK NEXUS version 5.0.2 did not yield any alerts for skin sensitisation for the test item SPM20200 is predicted to be not sensitising to the skin.
Executive summary:

DEREK NEXUS version 5.0.2 did not yield any alerts for skin sensitisation for the test item SPM20200 is predicted to be not sensitising to the skin.