Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 431-870-3 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
A 28-day repeated dose oral toxicity study on rats was carried out for substance BMS 217947-01. The study was carried out according to OECD guidance 407. Separate groups of 5 male and 5 female animals were each exposed to concentrations of 0, 15, 150 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day. No deaths were recorded during the 28-day. However, a number of adverse effects were observed at the test concentration of 1000 and 150 mg/kg/day when administered daily for 4 weeks by the oral route, based on dose-related increases in liver weights and associated hepatic and/or renal pathology. Therefore, the low dose level of 15 mg/kg/day was considered a NOEL (No Observed Effect Level).
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- sub-chronic toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2nd July 1999 - 21 Sept 1999
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: done under GLP and OECD method
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline No. 407 "Repeated Dose 28-day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents".
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Route of administration:
- oral: unspecified
- Vehicle:
- peanut oil
- Details on oral exposure:
- Method of administration:
Gavage - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Test duration: 28 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- Dosing regime: 7 days/week
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Male: 5 animals at 0 mg/kg bw/day
Male: 5 animals at 15 mg/kg bw/day
Male: 5 animals at 150 mg/kg bw/day
Male: 5 animals at 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Female: 5 animals at 0 mg/kg bw/day
Female: 5 animals at 15 mg/kg bw/day
Female: 5 animals at 150 mg/kg bw/day
Female: 5 animals at 1000 mg/kg bw/day - Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no clinical signs of treatment or significant differences in body weights and feed consumption noted in any group during the four weeks of dosing. There were no significant differences in motor activity or functional observation battery during the fourth week of dosing. The procedures used for the functional observational battery were confirmed to be suitable for detecting major neurotoxic endpoints by the use of positive control substances including chloropromazine, D-amphetamine and physostigmine.
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence):
- All animals survived the four weeks of dosing.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The only significant differences in feed consumption were increases in the 1000mg/kg male animals in weeks 2, 3 and 4 and increases in the 1000mg/kg female animals in week 4, compared to Group I during the four weeks of dosing. These were not considered toxicologically significant since increases in feed consumption are not used usually considered an adverse response to treatment.
- Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Significant increases in cholesterol, Globulin and Gamrna-Glutamyl Transferase levels and there were statistically significant decreases for Albumin/Globulin Ratio and Chloride observed in females treated with 1000mg/kg. There were no other toxicologically significant differences in haematology or clinical chemistry values. For the male animals, there was a statistically significant increase in the 1000mg/kg group for Total Bilirubin. None of these differences were clearly considered of toxicological significance.
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The only statistically significant difference in organ weights was an increase in absolute and/or relative (to body weight and to brain weight) liver weights for the 1000mg/kg male animals and female animals compared to controls. The observations in the liver may correlate with the microscopic pathology
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Other than increased liver weights, there were no macroscopic findings attributable to treatment with the test substance.
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Microscopically, slight to moderate centrilobular epatocytic hypertrophy was present in most of the animals administered 1000 mg/kg/day and in 2/5 of the male and female animals administered 150 mg/kg/day. This finding is suggestive of an adaptive change resulting from the increased metabolic demand on the liver following repeated administration of a xenobiotic. The kidneys from 4/5 of the male animals administered 1000 mg/kg/day showed cytoplasmic eosinophilic droplets in the proximal tubular epithelium of the kidney. The appearance and location of these inclusions is suggestive of a2 microglobulin induced nephropathy. This is a lesion, specific to the male rat, which has been described following administration of a variety of chemicals and pharmacological agents. Accumulation of a2 microglobulin in the lysosome can lead to cell death that can stimulate restorative cell replication promoting renal carcinogenesis in male rats. It is a finding considered to have limited significance and relevance to humans. In addition males treated with 1000mg/kg of the substance displayed lymphocytolysis in the thymus gland.
- Details on results:
- Clinical observations:
All animals survived the four weeks of dosing. There were no clinical signs of treatment or significant differences in body weights and feed consumption noted in any group during the four weeks of dosing. There were no significant differences in motor activity or functional observation battery during the fourth week of dosing. The procedures used for the functional observational battery were confirmed to be suitable for detecting major neurotoxic endpoints by the use of positive control substances including chloropromazine, D-amphetamine and physostigmine.
Laboratory findings:
Significant increases in cholesterol levels were observed in females treated with 1000mg/kg. There were no other toxicologically significant differences in haematology or clinical chemistry values. A statistically significant increase in absolute and/or relative (to body weight and to brain weight) liver weights for the 1000 mg/kg/day dosed male and female animals compared to the control animals was observed. A significant increase in spleen weight was apparent in male rats treated with 15mg/kg. Decreases in thymus weight and increases in kidney weight were observed in males treated with the highest dose of the substance.
Effects in organs:
Other than increased liver weights, there were no macroscopic findings attributable to treatment with the test substance. Microscopically, slight to moderate centrilobular epatocytic hypertrophy was present in most of the animals administered 1000 mg/kg/day and in 2/5 of the male and female animals administered 150 mg/kg/day. This finding is
suggestive of an adaptive change resulting from the increased metabolic demand on the liver following repeated administration of a xenobiotic. The kidneys from 4/5 of the male animals administered 1000 mg/kg/day showed cytoplasmic eosinophilic droplets in the proximal tubular epithelium of the kidney. The appearance and location of these inclusions is suggestive of a2 microglobulin induced nephropathy. This is a lesion, specific to the male rat, which has been described following administration of a variety of chemicals and pharmacological agents. Accumulation of a2 microglobulin in the lysosome can lead to cell death that can stimulate restorative cell replication promoting renal carcinogenesis in male rats. It is a finding considered to have limited significance and relevance to humans. In addition males treated with 1000mg/kg of the substance displayed lymphocytolysis in the thymus gland. - Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- 150 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Basis for effect level:
- other: original NCD unit is mg/kg/day.
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 15 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Basis for effect level:
- other: original NCD unit is mg/kg/day.
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- NOAEL and NOEL is < 15 mg/kg bw/day(nominal).
- Executive summary:
A 28-day repeated dose oral toxicity study on rats was carried out for substance BMS 217947-01. The study was carried out according to OECD guidance 407. Separate groups of 5 male and 5 female animals were each exposed to concentrations of 0, 15, 150 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day. No deaths were recorded during the 28-day. However, a number of adverse effects were observed even at the lowest test concentration of 15 mg/kg bw/day. Therefore, a NOAEL/NOEL could not be derived and it is expected to be lower than 15 mg/kg bw/day (nominal).
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
