Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-915-5 | CAS number: 111-85-3
Toxicological information
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP-study according to guideline
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 993
- Report date:
- 1993
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of study:
- Buehler test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1-chlorooctane
- EC Number:
- 203-915-5
- EC Name:
- 1-chlorooctane
- Cas Number:
- 111-85-3
- Molecular formula:
- C8H17Cl
- IUPAC Name:
- 1-chlorooctane
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Dunkin-Hartley
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan-Winkelmann, Versuchstierzucht, Borchen, Germany
- Age at study initiation: young adults
- Weight at study initiation: 471 +/- 31 g
- Housing: 5 animals per cage (Makrolon cage type IV)
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 +/- 3°C
- Humidity (%): 30-70%
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 25.04.1993 To: 11.06.1993
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Inductionopen allclose all
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Concentration / amount:
- 25.0% in corn oil (w/w)
Due to its low water solubility n-octyl chloride can not be applied using water as vehicle. However, n-octlyl chloride can be easily mixed with oil. In a pre-study 2.5, 25 and 50% n-octyl chloride were tested. A solution of 25% n-octyl chloride in corn oil was found to be the highest non-irritation concentration following repeated dosing and was therefore used in the main study.
Challengeopen allclose all
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Concentration / amount:
- 25.0% in corn oil (w/w)
Due to its low water solubility n-octyl chloride can not be applied using water as vehicle. However, n-octlyl chloride can be easily mixed with oil. In a pre-study 2.5, 25 and 50% n-octyl chloride were tested. A solution of 25% n-octyl chloride in corn oil was found to be the highest non-irritation concentration following repeated dosing and was therefore used in the main study.
- No. of animals per dose:
- 20 test animals
10 control animals - Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS:
- Number of animals: 4
- Exposure period: 6h
- Concentrations: 2.5, 25.0 and 50.0% test item in corn oil (w/w), 100% test item
- Observations: 6h, 24h, 48h and 7d post application
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 3
- Exposure period: 6h
- Test groups: 1
- Control group: 1
- Site: left flank
- Frequency of applications: 7 days
- Concentration: 25% in corn oil (w/w)
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: 1
- Exposure period: 6h
- Test groups: 1
- Control group: 1
- Site: right flank
- Concentration: 25% in corn oil (w/w)
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 6, 24, 48 and 72h
OTHER: - Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- 1-Chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzol
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- 0.1% 1-Chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzol in vaseline
50% of the 10 test animals show a positive skin reaction after 72h.
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 25 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 25 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 25 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 25 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 72
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 25 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 72.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 25 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 25 % (at challenge, inductions with vehicle)
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 25 % (at challenge, inductions with vehicle). No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 25 % (at challenge, inductions with vehicle)
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 25 % (at challenge, inductions with vehicle). No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 72
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 25 % (at challenge, inductions with vehicle)
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 72.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 25 % (at challenge, inductions with vehicle). No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
- Conclusions:
- Using the method of Buehler under the conditions of the study no skin sensitization potential of the test item was observed.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
