Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 239-590-1 | CAS number: 15541-60-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.529 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 15 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 13.22 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Most sensitive endpoint is for oral exposure and there are no long term toxicity data available via the inhalation route.
The dose descriptor staring point was derived from the most sensitive toxicity endpoint which is the 28-day repeat oral toxicity NOAEL of 15 mg/kg/day. According to Table 2 of ECHA practical guide 14,
For workers inhalation NOAEC:
Inhalatory NOAEC= oral NOAEL*(1/0.38 m3/kg/d)*0.67*(ABSoral/ABSinh.)=15mg/kg/d *(1/0.38 m3/kg/d)*0.67*0.5/1=13.22 mg/m3
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- default factor for starting point for DNEL derivation NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- although the study is a 28-day study, use of an AF for 90-day study is considered appropriate as it is considered that the repeat dose toxicity of MPP is sufficiently characterized in the available data and that subchronic toxicity testing would be unlikely to provide further relevant information.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- not needed for inhalation DNEL
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- the key study was part of a series of animal studies conducted to methods equivalent to modern regulatory standards. On this basis the quality of the database is not considered to contribute uncertainty and it is therefore not necessary to apply an additional factor.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no other uncertainties
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.15 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 15 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 15 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Most sensitive endpoint is for oral exposure and there are no long term toxicity data available via the dermal route.
The dose descriptor staring point was derived from the most sensitive toxicity endpoint which is the 28-day repeat oral toxicity NOAEL of 15 mg/kg/day. According to Table 2 of ECHA practical guide 14, NOAEL oral =NOAEL dermal x (absorption oral/absorption dermal). In the absence of any data it is assumed that 100% absorption occurs for both oral and dermal routes and therefore NOAEL oral = NOAEL dermal = 15mg/kg/day.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- default factor for starting point for DNEL derivation NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- although the study is a 28-day study, use of an AF for 90-day study is considered appropriate as it is considered that the repeat dose toxicity of MPP is sufficiently characterized in the available data and that subchronic toxicity testing would be unlikely to provide further relevant information.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- allometric scaling factor for the rat
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- the key study was part of a series of animal studies conducted to methods equivalent to modern regulatory standards. On this basis the quality of the database is not considered to contribute uncertainty and it is therefore not necessary to apply an additional factor.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no other uncertainties
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - workers
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.13 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 15 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 6.52 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Most sensitive endpoint is for oral exposure and there are no long term toxicity data available via the inhalation route.
The dose descriptor staring point was derived from the most sensitive toxicity endpoint which is the 28-day repeat oral toxicity NOAEL of 15 mg/kg/day. According to Table 2 of ECHA practical guide 14,
For general population inhalation NOAEC:
Inhalatory NOAECcorr=NOAELoral*(1/1.15 m3/kg/d)*(ABSoral-rat/ABSinh-human) = 15 mg/kg/d*(1/1.15 m3/kg/d)*(0.5/1)=6.52 mg/m3
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- default factor for starting point for DNEL derivation NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- although the study is a 28-day study, use of an AF for 90-day study is considered appropriate as it is considered that the repeat dose toxicity of MPP is sufficiently characterized in the available data and that subchronic toxicity testing would be unlikely to provide further relevant information.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- not needed for inhalation DNEL
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- the key study was part of a series of animal studies conducted to methods equivalent to modern regulatory standards. On this basis the quality of the database is not considered to contribute uncertainty and it is therefore not necessary to apply an additional factor.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no other uncertainties
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.075 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 15 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 15 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Most sensitive endpoint is for oral exposure and there are no long term toxicity data available via the dermal route.
The dose descriptor starting point was derived from the most sensitive toxicity endpoint which is the 28-day repeat oral toxicity NOAEL of 15 mg/kg/day. According to Table 2 of ECHA practical guide 14, NOAEL oral =NOAEL dermal x (absorption oral/absorption dermal). In the absence of any data it is assumed that 100% absorption occurs for both oral and dermal routes and therefore NOAEL oral = NOAEL dermal = 15mg/kg/day.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- default factor for starting point for DNEL derivation NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- although the study is a 28-day study, use of an AF for 90-day study is considered appropriate as it is considered that the repeat dose toxicity of MPP is sufficiently characterized in the available data and that subchronic toxicity testing would be unlikely to provide further relevant information.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- allometric scaling factor for the rat
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The key study was part of a series of animal studies conducted to methods equivalent to modern regulatory standards. On this basis the quality of the database is not considered to contribute uncertainty and it is therefore not necessary to apply an additional factor.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No other uncertainties
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.075 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 15 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
not applicable - route to route extrapolation is not required
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default factor for starting point for DNEL derivation NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- although the study is a 28-day study, use of an AF for 90-day study is considered appropriate as it is considered that the repeat dose toxicity of MPP is sufficiently characterized in the available data and that subchronic toxicity testing would be unlikely to provide further relevant information.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- allometeric scaling factor for the rat
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The key study was part of a series of animal studies conducted to methods equivalent to modern regulatory standards. On this basis the quality of the database is not considered to contribute uncertainty and it is therefore not necessary to apply an additional factor.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No other uncertainties
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - General Population
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
