Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2016
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA:J
Remarks:
CrHsd
Sex:
female
Vehicle:
methyl ethyl ketone
Concentration:
In the preliminary assay, dose concentrations of 1%, 2.5%, 5.0% and 10% (w/v) in methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) revealed no erythema and ear thickness increases was less than 25%. Therefore, dose concentrations of 1%, 5% and 10% (w/v) in methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) DPX-C (Di-Cloro-Di-p-Xililene) were evaluated in the main study.
No. of animals per dose:
8 (2 mice/group) for preliminary assay, and 25 (5 mice/group) for main study.
Details on study design:
Females (nulliparous and non-pregnant).
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.63
Test group / Remarks:
1% MEK
Parameter:
SI
Value:
2.51
Test group / Remarks:
5% MEK
Parameter:
SI
Value:
5.31
Test group / Remarks:
10% MEK
Parameter:
EC3
Value:
5.88
Test group / Remarks:
10% MEK
Interpretation of results:
Category 1B (indication of skin sensitising potential) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
The SI obtained for DPX-C (Di-Cloro-Di-p-Xililene) at 10% concentration showed a greater than three fold increase over the control value with an EC3 value found to be 5.88%. Therefore, DPX-C (Di-Cloro-Di-p-Xililene) demonstrates moderate sensitiser potential in the local lymph node assay.
Executive summary:

This study was conducted to evaluate the skin sensitisation potential of DPX-C (Di-Cloro-Di-p-Xililene) in CBA/J strain mice in compliance with the OECD test guidelines for the local lymph node assay (LLNA).

A preliminary assay was conducted using treatment conditions similar to the main assay, in order to identify the appropriate test concentrations for the sensitisation assay.

Five groups of mice (each comprising 5 females) were selected for the main experiment. Based on the results from the preliminary assay, three groups were treated with DPX-C (Di-Cloro-Di-p-Xililene) at concentrations of 1%, 5% and 10% (w/v) in methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) for three consecutive days (days 0, 1 and 2) on the dorsum of both ears (25mL per ear). In addition, one group served as the vehicle control and was treated with methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) and another group served as the positive control and was treated with HCA (a-hexylcinnamaldehyde)at a concentration of 25% (v/v) in methyl ethyl ketone (MEK).

Group mean body weights of treated animals were comparable with the control group and there were no indications of skin irritation at the treatment site or systemic toxicity in DPX-C (Di-Cloro-Di-p-Xililene) treated animals.

On day 5, the uptake of intravenously injected3H-methyl thymidine into the auricular (local) lymph nodes draining at the site of chemical application was measured (5 hours post-administration) to assess the lymph node proliferative response. Stimulation indices (SI) for the 1%, 5% and 10% (w/v) in methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) of DPX-C (Di-Cloro-Di-p-Xililene) treated groups were 1.63, 2.51 and 5.31, respectively.

The SI obtained forDPX-C (Di-Cloro-Di-p-Xililene)at 10% concentration showed a greater than three fold increase over the control value with an EC3value found to be 5.88%. Therefore,DPX-C (Di-Cloro-Di-p-Xililene)demonstrates moderate sensitiser potential in the local lymph node assay.

Apositive response for HCA (SI = 11.40), in agreement with historical controls, confirmed the reliability of the test procedure.

Based on the results of this study, an indication of the classification forDPX-C (Di-Cloro-Di-p-Xililene) isas follows:

Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS2015): Sub Category 1B.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (sensitising)
Additional information:

The SI obtained forDPX-C (Di-Cloro-Di-p-Xililene)at 10% concentration showed a greater than three fold increase over the control value with an EC3value found to be 5.88%. Therefore,DPX-C (Di-Cloro-Di-p-Xililene)demonstrates moderate sensitiser potential in the local lymph node assay.

Justification for classification or non-classification

The SI obtained for DPX-C (Di-Cloro-Di-p-Xililene) at 10% concentration showed a greater than three fold increase over the control value with an EC3value found to be 5.88%. Therefore, DPX-C (Di-Cloro-Di-p-Xililene) demonstrates moderate sensitiser potential in the local lymph node assay.

Therefore according to Regulaion (EC) n. 1272/2008, Dichloro-p-cyclophane is classified as Skin Sens. 1B, H317.