Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
06 June - 23 June 1989
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study with acceptable restrictions (only few details on the test substance given)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1989
Report date:
1989

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Lack of details on test substance
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Fatty acids, C16-18, triesters with trimethylolpropane
EC Number:
293-037-9
EC Name:
Fatty acids, C16-18, triesters with trimethylolpropane
Cas Number:
91050-90-7
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): only trade name given
- Physical state: solid, white
- Analytical purity: not reported

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: Kleinrusse, Chbb:HM
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Fa. Thomae, Biberach, Germany
- Age at study initiation: 5-6 months
- Weight at study initiation: 2.4 kg (mean)
- Housing: individually in rabbit-battery
- Diet: Altromin 2023, ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimatisation: approx. 1 week

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-25
- Humidity (%): 45-70
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12

Test system

Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
other: clipped
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 g
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 h
Observation period:
72 h
Reading time points: 1, 24, 48, 72 h
Number of animals:
3 males
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 6 cm²

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.7
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 h
Remarks on result:
other: very slight erythema (grade 1) was seen at 24 and 72 h
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 h
Remarks on result:
other: very slight erythema (grade 1) was seen at 24h
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 h
Remarks on result:
other: very slight erythema (grade 1) was seen at 24 h
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 3 animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: reversibility: not applicable
Remarks on result:
other: No edema observed
Irritant / corrosive response data:
All 3 animals displayed very slight erythema at reading time point 24 h; in one case (animal 1), erythema remained up to 48 h. The finding was fully reversible for all 3 animals with 48 to 72 h. No edema was seen.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Erythema score

Animal Number

1 h

1 day

2 days

3 days

1

0

1

1

0

2

0

1

0

0

3

0

1

0

0

 

Table 2: Edema Score

Animal Number

1 h

1 day

2 days

3 days

1

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

3

0

0

0

0

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified