Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Repeated dose toxicity: oral

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
sub-chronic toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2003
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Remarks:
The study was performed on a similar substance to the registered substance and as such is considered to be sufficient to address the endpoint by read-across.
Justification for type of information:
In accordance with point 8.6.1 of Annex VIII, of Regulation EC No. 1907/2006, testing for this endpoint should be performed using an appropriate route of exposure. A 14-week oral study was therefore submitted to fulfil the repeated dose toxicity data requirements. Exposure via the oral route is considered a more appropriate route of exposure as the physical chemical properties such as the physical state (liquid at room temperature and pressure) and vapour pressure indicate that exposure via inhalation is unlikely. In addition, although dermal exposure is considered a likely route of exposure, the oral route is expected to provide a higher systemic dose and is therefore representative of a worst case scenario.
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study
Reference
Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
13 May 2014 - 17 August 2015
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.4 (Vapour Pressure)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 104 (Vapour Pressure Curve)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
effusion method: Knudsen cell
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Batch No.of test material: SC00010875
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 9 April 2015
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Temp.:
20 °C
Vapour pressure:
0.311 Pa
Remarks on result:
other: mean value (Test 1; test 2)
Test no.:
#2
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
0.479 Pa
Remarks on result:
other: Mean value (Tes 1, test 2)
Conclusions:
Vapour pressure under the test condition is 0.3112 Pa at 20°C.
Executive summary:

The vapour pressure of ADOXAL has been determined to be 0.3112 Pa at 20°C according to the OECD 104 guideline.

Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study
Reference
Endpoint:
appearance / physical state / colour
Type of information:
other: based on observation
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: based on observation
Justification for type of information:
No guideline is required according to REACh TGD. Considering that the substance is well characterised and that the data come from a GLP study, full reliability applies.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study
Qualifier:
no guideline required
Version / remarks:
No guideline is required according to REACh TGD.
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- batch No.of test material: SC00010875
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 9 April 2015


Physical state at 20°C and 1013 hPa:
liquid
Key result
Form:
liquid
Colour:
Colorless to yellow pale
Odour:
other: Aldehydic, Marine, Powerful and Waxy
Substance type:
organic
Executive summary:

The test substance Adoxal is a liquid, colorless to yellow pale.

No guideline is required according to REACh TGD. Considering that the substance is well characterised and that the data come from a GLP study, full reliability applies.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2003
Report date:
2002

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/testing/types/cartox/protocols/13week/index.html
Version / remarks:
study was conducted according to National Toxicology Program protocols
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Citral
EC Number:
226-394-6
EC Name:
Citral
Cas Number:
5392-40-5
Molecular formula:
C10 H16 O
IUPAC Name:
3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadienal
Test material form:
liquid
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Test substance name : Citral
Geometric isomer ratio of 2:1 geranial:neral obtained from Aldrich Chemical Compagny (lot A: 97.6% pure)

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Fischer 344
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Animals were obtained from Taconic Laboratories Animals and Services (Germantown, NY). They were approximately six weeks old on the first day of the study. Rats were housed five per cage. Feed and water were available ad Libitum.

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
other: Microcapsules were combined with feed
Vehicle:
other: empty microcapsules
Details on oral exposure:
Citral was microencapsuled by Midwest Research Institute. Microcapsules loaded with neat citral and placebo (empty capsules) were prepared in several batches by a proprietary process using food-grade sugar and starch to produce dry microspheres.
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
yes
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
Dose formulations were analyzed at three timepoints and were within 10% of the target.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
14-weeks
Frequency of treatment:
Daily with feed
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Dose / conc.:
3 900 other: mg microencapsuled citra/Kg diet (ppm)
Remarks:
Loaded microcapsules were combined with feed to a concentration at 10% microcapsules
Dose / conc.:
7 800 other: mg microencapsuled citra/Kg diet (ppm)
Remarks:
Loaded microcapsules were combined with feed to a concentration at 10% microcapsules
Dose / conc.:
15 600 other: mg microencapsuled citra/Kg diet (ppm)
Remarks:
Loaded microcapsules were combined with feed to a concentration at 10% microcapsules
Dose / conc.:
31 300 other: mg microencapsuled citra/Kg diet (ppm)
Remarks:
Loaded microcapsules were combined with feed to a concentration at 10% microcapsules
No. of animals per sex per dose:
groups of 20 male and female rats
Control animals:
yes, concurrent no treatment

Examinations

Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
Clinical findings were recorded weekly. Feed consumption was recorded twice weekly. The animals were weighted initially, weekly thereafter, and at the end of the study.
Sacrifice and pathology:
Necropsies were performed on all core study animals. The heart, right kidney, liver, lung, right testis, and thymus were weighed. Tissues for microscopic examination were fixed and preserved, processed and trimmed, embedded, sectioned and stained. A complete histopathologic examination was performed on all core study untreated control and vehicle control rats, 15,600 ppm rats, and 31,300 ppm rats.
Other examinations:
Blood was collected from the retroorbital sinus of 10 designated rats from each group under carbon dioxide anesthesia on days 4 and 22 for hematology and clinical pathology and then euthanized with C02. Using the same method, blood was collected from all core study rats surviving to the end of the studies for hematology and clinical chemistry analyses.
Statistics:
The probability of survival was estimated by the product-limit procedure of Kaplan and Meier. Statistical analyses for possible dose-related effects on survival used Cox's method for testing two groups for equality and Tarone's life table test to identify dose-related trends. Organ and body weight data were analyzed with the parametric multiple comparison procedures of Dunnett and Williams. Hematology and clinical chemistry data were analyzed using the nonparametric multiple comparison methods of Shirley and Dunn. Extreme values were identified by the outlier test of Dixon and Massey. Average severity values were analyzed for significance with the Mann-Whitney U-test. The Poly-k test was used to assess neoplasm and nonneoplastic lesion prevalence.

Results and discussion

Results of examinations

Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Mortality:
mortality observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence):
All rats in the 31,300 ppm groups were killed moribund in the second week.
Body weight and weight changes:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Final mean body weights and body weight gains of males and females were generally significantly less than those of the vehicle controls.
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Feed consumption by 15,600 and 31,300 ppm males and females was less than that of the vehicle controls during the first week of the study.
Food efficiency:
not specified
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not examined
Ophthalmological findings:
not examined
Haematological findings:
no effects observed
Clinical biochemistry findings:
no effects observed
Urinalysis findings:
no effects observed
Behaviour (functional findings):
no effects observed
Immunological findings:
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
no effects observed
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Neuropathological findings:
not specified
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Nephropathy with renal tubule granular casts was observed in male rats; however, this effect is specific to the male rat and not considered relevant for humans.
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
no effects observed
Other effects:
not specified

Effect levels

Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
>= 335 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
female
Basis for effect level:
body weight and weight gain

Target system / organ toxicity

Key result
Critical effects observed:
no

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
In a 14-week dietary study, the following NOAELs due to effects on body weight gain were observed: 345 mg/kg bw/day in male rats, 335 mg/kg bw/day in female rats.
Executive summary:

A 14 -week citral dietary study was conducted in rats. Mortalities were observed at the highest doses, with renal and body weight gain effects at lower doses. The NOAELs were as follows: 345 mg/kg bw/day in male rats and 335 mg/kg bw/day in female rats.