Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Flammability

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
flammable solids
Data waiving:
study technically not feasible
Justification for data waiving:
the study does not need to be conducted because the substance is a liquid
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
data waiving: supporting information
Reference
Endpoint:
appearance / physical state / colour
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
April 29, 2004
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The study used for the fulfilment of this endpoint was conducted according to OECD Guidelines, in compliance with GLP.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The physical state and appearance of the test substance was identified on the basis of visual observation.
GLP compliance:
yes
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Identification: PARAD Substance 139
Batch: 31104251
Purity: n.a. (mixture)
Physical state at 20°C and 1013 hPa:
liquid
Key result
Form:
liquid: viscous
Colour:
slightly yellowish
Substance type:
organic
Conclusions:
The test substance is a slightly yellowish viscous liquid at room temperature.
Executive summary:

Based on the identification of the test substance in a guideline compliant study, the test substance is a slightly yellowish viscous liquid at room temperature (van der Baan-Treur, 2004).

Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
data waiving: supporting information
Reference
Endpoint:
flash point, other
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
March 17, 2015
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study without detailed documentation
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
ISO 2719 (Determination of flash point - Pensky-Martens closed cup method)
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of method:
closed cup
Flash point apparatus:
Pensky-Martens apparatus
Key result
Flash point:
> 100 °C
Remarks on result:
no flash point up to 100°C
Remarks:
Testing was interrupted to prevent thermal polymerization and potential decomposition.

Table:

 Test  Mixture / compound tested Starting temperature, °C   Flash point, °C
 1  Test substance  25  No flash up to 100°C
 2  Test substance  76  No flash up to 100°C
 3  Test substance  76  No flash up to 100°C

No flashing was detected in the tests up to ~100°C when the test substance was tested in a Pensky-Martens closed cup tester. The exact flash point could not be determined since testing was interrupted at 100°C in order to prevent thermal polymerization and potential decomposition of the test substance in the tester. The test results showed that the flash point of the test substance was higher than 100°C.

Interpretation of results:
other: CLP criteria not met
Remarks:
not classified
Conclusions:
Under the study conditions, testing was interrupted at 100°C in order to prevent thermal polymerization and potential decomposition of the test substance in the tester. The test results showed that the flash point of the test substance was higher than 100°C.
Executive summary:

A study was conducted to determine the flash point of the test substance, according to ISO 2719 (Pensky-Martens closed cup method). Three flash point tests were performed on the samples.

No flashing was detected in the tests up to ~100°C when the test substance was tested in a Pensky-Martens closed cup tester. The exact flash point could not be determined since testing was interrupted at 100°C in order to prevent thermal polymerization and potential decomposition of the test substance in the tester. Under the study conditions, the flash point of the test substance was higher than 100°C (Martens, 2015).

Data source

Materials and methods

Results and discussion

Applicant's summary and conclusion