Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2015
Report date:
2015

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
Deviations:
no
Remarks:
The study was conducted according to the guideline in effect at the time of study conduct.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
Deviations:
no
Remarks:
The study was conducted according to the guideline in effect dated 2008.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
Deviations:
no
Remarks:
The study was conducted according to the guideline in effect dated 1998.
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
mammalian cell gene mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
66711-86-2
Cas Number:
66711-86-2
IUPAC Name:
66711-86-2
Test material form:
gas under pressure: liquefied gas
Details on test material:
- Purity: 99.79%

Method

Target gene:
The hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (HPRT) locus (hprt) of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Type and identity of media: Ham's F12 medium supplemented with 3 mM L-glutamine and 5% (v/v) heat-inactivated and dialyzed fetal bovine serum (F12FCM5)
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S9
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Dose Range-Finding Assay: 0.195, 0.391, 0.781, 1.56, 3.13, 6.25, 12.5, 25.0, 50.0 and 100% (v/v, in air)

CHO/HPRT Mutagenicity Assay: 7.91, 15.8, 31.6, 42.2, 56.3, 75.0 and 100% (v/v, in air) with and without S9.
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle used: air
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
not specified
Positive controls:
other: ethylmethanesulphonate (-S9); benzo(a)pyrene (+S9)
Remarks:
both controls were diluted in DMSO
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: plated in medium

DURATION
- Preincubation period: overnight
- Exposure duration: 5 (±0.5) hours in the presence and absence of S9
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 7 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 7 days
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): After the 5-hour treatment, the treatment media were removed, the cultures were washed twice with 10 mL CMF-HBSS and then were trypsinized and counted. Cells were subcultured at ~2.4E6 cells/225-cm2 flask in 30 mL F12FCM5 in duplicate for phenotypic expression and incubated under standard conditions

SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): Cultures treated at concentrations of 15.8, 31.6, 56.3, 75.0 and 100% (v/v, in air) were chosen for mutant selection (cultures treated at concentrations of 7.91 and 42.2% were discarded prior to selection because a sufficient number of other concentrations was available).

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: All test substance, negative and positive control concentrations were evaluated in duplicate cultures.

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 6E5 cells/150-mm plate (4 plates total)

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency
Evaluation criteria:
The test substance was considered to have produced a positive response if it induced a statistically significant and dose-dependent increase in mutant frequency (p≤ 0.05) that exceeded the 95% confidence limit of the historical vehicle control data from the testing laboratory. If only one criterion was met (a statistically significant or dose-dependent increase or an increase exceeding the historical control 95% confidence interval), the results were considered equivocal. If none of these criteria were met, the results were considered to be negative.
Statistics:
Statistical analyses were performed using the method of Snee and Irr.

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Remarks:
HPRT
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative with and without metabolic activation

The study and the conclusions which are drawn from it fulfil the quality criteria (validity, reliability, repeatability).
These results indicate that the test substance was negative in the In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation (CHO/HPRT) Assay, in the presence and absence of metabolic activation, under the conditions and according to the criteria of the test protocol.
Executive summary:

The test substance was evaluated for its ability to induce forward mutations at the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (HPRT) locus (hprt) of Chinese hamster ovary(CHO) cells, in the presence and absence of an exogenous metabolic activation system (S9), as assayed by colony growth in the presence of 6-thioguanine (TG resistance, TGr). The test substance was evaluated in a preliminary dose range-finding assay at concentrations of 0.195, 0.391, 0.781, 1.56, 3.13, 6.25, 12.5, 25.0, 50.0 and 100% (v/v, in air) with and without an exogenous S9 metabolic activation system (the highest concentration evaluated was the limit dose for this assay). Ambient air was used as the negative (untreated) control. No visible precipitate was observed at the beginning or end of treatment, and the test substance did not have an adverse impact on the pH of the cultures. Adjusted relative survival at a concentration of 100% (v/v, in air) was 44.37 and 13.52% with and without S9, respectively.

Based on these results the test substance was evaluated in the definitive mutagenicity assay at concentrations of 7.91, 15.8, 31.6, 42.2, 56.3, 75.0 and 100% (v/v, in air) with and without S9. No visible precipitate was observed at the beginning or end of treatment. The average adjusted relative survival at a concentration of 100% (v/v, in air) was 96.25 and 72.04% with and without S9, respectively. Cultures treated at concentrations of 15.8, 31.6, 56.3, 75.0 and 100% (v/v, in air) were chosen for mutant selection (cultures treated at concentrations of 7.91 and 42.2% were discarded prior to selection because a sufficient number of other concentrations was available). No significant increases in mutant frequency, as compared to the concurrent vehicle controls, were observed at any concentration evaluated with or without S9 (p> 0.05). In contrast, the positive controls induced a significant increase in mutant frequency (p< 0.01).

These results indicate that the test substance was negative in the In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation (CHO/HPRT) Assay, in the presence and absence of metabolic activation, under the conditions and according to the criteria of the test protocol.