Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 811-213-0 | CAS number: 66711-86-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 015
- Report date:
- 2015
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Remarks:
- The study was conducted according to the guideline in effect at the time of study conduct.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Remarks:
- The study was conducted according to the guideline in effect dated 2008.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
- Deviations:
- no
- Remarks:
- The study was conducted according to the guideline in effect dated 1998.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 66711-86-2
- Cas Number:
- 66711-86-2
- IUPAC Name:
- 66711-86-2
- Test material form:
- gas under pressure: liquefied gas
- Details on test material:
- - Purity: 99.79%
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- The hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (HPRT) locus (hprt) of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: Ham's F12 medium supplemented with 3 mM L-glutamine and 5% (v/v) heat-inactivated and dialyzed fetal bovine serum (F12FCM5)
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Dose Range-Finding Assay: 0.195, 0.391, 0.781, 1.56, 3.13, 6.25, 12.5, 25.0, 50.0 and 100% (v/v, in air)
CHO/HPRT Mutagenicity Assay: 7.91, 15.8, 31.6, 42.2, 56.3, 75.0 and 100% (v/v, in air) with and without S9. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle used: air
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- other: ethylmethanesulphonate (-S9); benzo(a)pyrene (+S9)
- Remarks:
- both controls were diluted in DMSO
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: plated in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: overnight
- Exposure duration: 5 (±0.5) hours in the presence and absence of S9
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 7 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 7 days
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): After the 5-hour treatment, the treatment media were removed, the cultures were washed twice with 10 mL CMF-HBSS and then were trypsinized and counted. Cells were subcultured at ~2.4E6 cells/225-cm2 flask in 30 mL F12FCM5 in duplicate for phenotypic expression and incubated under standard conditions
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): Cultures treated at concentrations of 15.8, 31.6, 56.3, 75.0 and 100% (v/v, in air) were chosen for mutant selection (cultures treated at concentrations of 7.91 and 42.2% were discarded prior to selection because a sufficient number of other concentrations was available).
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: All test substance, negative and positive control concentrations were evaluated in duplicate cultures.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 6E5 cells/150-mm plate (4 plates total)
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency - Evaluation criteria:
- The test substance was considered to have produced a positive response if it induced a statistically significant and dose-dependent increase in mutant frequency (p≤ 0.05) that exceeded the 95% confidence limit of the historical vehicle control data from the testing laboratory. If only one criterion was met (a statistically significant or dose-dependent increase or an increase exceeding the historical control 95% confidence interval), the results were considered equivocal. If none of these criteria were met, the results were considered to be negative.
- Statistics:
- Statistical analyses were performed using the method of Snee and Irr.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Remarks:
- HPRT
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative with and without metabolic activation
The study and the conclusions which are drawn from it fulfil the quality criteria (validity, reliability, repeatability).
These results indicate that the test substance was negative in the In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation (CHO/HPRT) Assay, in the presence and absence of metabolic activation, under the conditions and according to the criteria of the test protocol. - Executive summary:
The test substance was evaluated for its ability to induce forward mutations at the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (HPRT) locus (hprt) of Chinese hamster ovary(CHO) cells, in the presence and absence of an exogenous metabolic activation system (S9), as assayed by colony growth in the presence of 6-thioguanine (TG resistance, TGr). The test substance was evaluated in a preliminary dose range-finding assay at concentrations of 0.195, 0.391, 0.781, 1.56, 3.13, 6.25, 12.5, 25.0, 50.0 and 100% (v/v, in air) with and without an exogenous S9 metabolic activation system (the highest concentration evaluated was the limit dose for this assay). Ambient air was used as the negative (untreated) control. No visible precipitate was observed at the beginning or end of treatment, and the test substance did not have an adverse impact on the pH of the cultures. Adjusted relative survival at a concentration of 100% (v/v, in air) was 44.37 and 13.52% with and without S9, respectively.
Based on these results the test substance was evaluated in the definitive mutagenicity assay at concentrations of 7.91, 15.8, 31.6, 42.2, 56.3, 75.0 and 100% (v/v, in air) with and without S9. No visible precipitate was observed at the beginning or end of treatment. The average adjusted relative survival at a concentration of 100% (v/v, in air) was 96.25 and 72.04% with and without S9, respectively. Cultures treated at concentrations of 15.8, 31.6, 56.3, 75.0 and 100% (v/v, in air) were chosen for mutant selection (cultures treated at concentrations of 7.91 and 42.2% were discarded prior to selection because a sufficient number of other concentrations was available). No significant increases in mutant frequency, as compared to the concurrent vehicle controls, were observed at any concentration evaluated with or without S9 (p> 0.05). In contrast, the positive controls induced a significant increase in mutant frequency (p< 0.01).
These results indicate that the test substance was negative in the In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation (CHO/HPRT) Assay, in the presence and absence of metabolic activation, under the conditions and according to the criteria of the test protocol.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.