Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 440-050-4 | CAS number: 243857-97-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The NOAEL of the test substance was determined to be 250 mg/kg bw/day in the 28-day study in rats.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
A study was conducted to assess the subacute repeated dose toxicity of the test substance in rats according OECD guideline 407 and EU Method B.7.
Groups of male and female rats received test substance by oral gavage at dose levels of 0, 62.5, 250 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day for a period of 28 d. On Day 29, 5 males and five females from each group were killed and necropsied. Five males and five females from the control and high dose group were killed and necropsied after a recovery period of 14 d.
Behavior and state of health were observed daily in all groups. Body weights and food consumption were recorded twice weekly, water consumption once weekly. Once before the first treatment and once a week thereafter detailed clinical observations were performed in all animals outside the home cage in a standard arena ('open field'). Additionally, the animals were examined for opacity of the refracting media of the eyes, damage to the oral mucosa and impairment of dental growth.
Neurotoxicological measurements including assessment of sensory function, motor activity, forelimb and hind limb grip strength were conducted at the end of the treatment period. Hematological examinations, clinical chemistry and urine analysis were carried out at the end of the treatment period and after the recovery period.
During necropsy the animals were examined for macroscopically visible abnormalities, the main organs were weighed and the organ to body weight ratios calculated. Organs and tissues were processed for histopathological examination and checked for microscopically visible changes.
Body weights, hematological and clinical chemistry data, urine data (volume, specific weight), absolute and relative organ weights and neurotoxicological measurements (motor activity, forelimb and hind limb grip strength) were analyzed with the aid of a statistical program.
No deaths occurred throughout the study. Behavior, state of health, neurotoxicological, body weight gains and food consumption remained unaffected by the administration of the test substance in all dose groups.
Water consumption was distinctly increased in all animals of the high dose in the course of the treatment period. Consequently, the urine volume was increased in this group during the treatment period. Polyuria and polydipsia are well-known side effects for lithium. As the content of lithium is rather high in this test substance, these effects were most likely related to the lithium salt content.
The urine of most males of the 28-d treatment and the recovery high-dose groups was discolored salmon-pink in different intensities. Hematological and clinical chemistry investigations and organ weights did not exhibit treatment related adverse effects. The serum of almost all animals of the high-dose recovery and the intermediate and high dose final groups was discolored by the dye.
At necropsy of the final and/or recovery value animals of the intermediate and/or high dose groups showed reddish discolored Kidneys, skin, adipose tissue, testes, epididymes, stomach, and small intestines.
In conclusion, repeated administration of test substance caused reversible slight acute topical irritations in the submucosa of the stomach and pigment depositions in the kidneys of animals of the high dose group without causing any tissue damage. Additionally these animals showed sporadically temporarily increased salivation and distinctly increased water consumption, due to the lithium salt content. The test substance did not cause compound related adverse effects in the intermediate and low dose groups.
Under the test conditions, as a consequence of the combination of the effects in the high dose group the NOAEL is 250 mg/kg bw/day. (Dr. Seeberger A, 1999).
Justification for classification or non-classification
The NOAEL and NOEL of the test substance were determined to be 250 and 62.5 mg/kg bw/day respectively in the 28-d oral study in rats. However based on the results of the study, the test substance does not meet the requirement for classification according to according to EC criteria (67/548/EEC) and according to CLP criteria (EC 1272/2008).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
