Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 210-519-6 | CAS number: 617-52-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 12.3 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- LOAEC
- Value:
- 308.6 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- No inhalation study is available and NOAEC was derived by route to route extrapolation from the systemic oral NOAEL. 8 h exposure time, extrapolation from 50% bioavailability oral to 100% bioavailability inhalation. Corrected inhalatory NOAEC = 350 mg/kg bw/day*(1/0.38 m3/kg/day)*(50%/100%)*(6.7 m3 (8h)/10 m3 (8h)) = 308.6 mg/m3
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required, starting point is NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- subchronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- not for concentrations
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default factor for remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- default factor for worker
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- sensitisation (skin)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 3.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 350 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- assumed that rat oral and dermal absorptions are equal to human oral and dermal absorption
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required, starting point is NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- subchronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- allometric scaling factor rat-human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default factor for remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- default factor for worker
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- sensitisation (skin)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
The long term inhalation DNEL for systemic effects was calculated from ca. 17-week oral (gavage) repeated dose toxicity study in rat. The NOAEC of 308.6 mg/m3 was derived by route to route extrapolation from oral NOAEL determined for systemic effects. The calculated DNEL is 12.3 mg/m3, applying the assessment factor of 25.
The acute/short term inhalation DNEL for systemic effects was not assessed, since no adequate quantitative NOAEL could be identified. No hazard for this endpoint was suggested based on the waiver for the acute inhalation toxicity study supported by the regulation (EC) 1907/2006 Annex XI (1.2 Weight of evidence).
From a skin sensitisation study it is known that DMI shows sensitising properties. The long-term inhalation and dermal DNELs for local effects were not derived since no quantitative NOAEL could be identified. Medium hazard for these endpoints was suggested based on ECHA Practical Guide 15 and skin sensitization study, where DMI is classified into category 1 (sub-category 1B).
The acute/short term inhalation DNEL for local effects was not assessed, since no quantitative NOAEL could be identified. Low hazard for this endpoint was suggested based on ECHA Practical Guide 15 and skin irritation study, where DMI is classified into category 2.
The long term dermal DNEL for systemic effects was calculated from ca. 17-week oral (gavage) repeated dose toxicity study in rat. The DNEL was derived by route to route extrapolation from oral NOAEL set for systemic effects. The calculated DNEL is 3.5 mg/kg bw/day, applying the assessment factor of 100.
The acute/short term dermal DNEL for systemic effects was not assessed, since no quantitative NOAEL could be identified. The substance showed relatively low acute oral toxicity (LD > 2000 mg/kg bw) suggesting that dermal toxicity will be identical or less hazardous, therefore the hazard was qualified to be low based on ECHA Practical Guide 15.
The acute/short term dermal DNEL for local effects was not assessed, since no quantitative NOAEL could be identified. Low hazard for this endpoint was suggested based on ECHA Practical Guide 15 and skin irritation study, where DMI is classified into category 2.
No hazard for the eyes was identified, since in a reliable eye irritation study (OECD TG 405) the test item is not irritating in rabbit eye.
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 3.04 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 152.2 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- No inhalation study is available and the NOAEC was derived by route to route extrapolation from the oral NOAEL. 24 h exposure time, extrapolation from 50% bioavailability oral to 100% bioavailability inhalation. Corrected inhalatory NOAEC = 350 mg/kg bw/day*(1/1.15 m3/kg/day)*(50%/100%) = 152.2 mg/m3
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required, starting point is NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- subchronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- not for concentrations
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default factor for remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- default factor for general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- sensitisation (skin)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.75 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 350 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- assumed that rat oral and dermal absorptions are equal to human oral and dermal absorption
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required, starting point is NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- subchronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- allometric scaling factor rat-human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default factor for remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- default factor for general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- sensitisation (skin)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.75 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 350 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- starting point: NOAEL from oral study
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required, starting point is NOEAL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- subchronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- allometric scaling factor rat-human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default factor for remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- default factor for general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
The long term inhalation DNEL for systemic effects was calculated from ca. 17-week oral (gavage) repeated dose toxicity study in rat. The NOAEC of 152.2 mg/m³ was derived by route to route extrapolation from oral NOAEL determined for systemic effects. The calculated DNEL is 3.04 mg/m³, applying the assessment factor of 50.
The acute/short term inhalation DNEL for systemic effects was not assessed, since no adequate quantitative NOAEL could be identified. No hazard for this endpoint was suggested based on the waiver for the acute inhalation toxicity study supported by the regulation (EC) 1907/2006 Annex XI (1.2 Weight of evidence).
From a skin sensitisation study it is known that DMI shows sensitising properties. The long-term inhalation and dermal DNELs for local effects were not derived since no quantitative NOAEL could be identified. Medium hazard for these endpoints was suggested based on ECHA Practical Guide 15 and skin sensitization study, where DMI is classified into category 1 (sub-category 1B).
The acute/short term inhalation DNEL for local effects was not assessed, since no adequate quantitative NOAEL could be identified. Low hazard for this endpoint was suggested based on ECHA Practical Guide 15 and skin irritation study, where DMI is classified into category 2.
The long term dermal DNEL for systemic effects was calculated from ca. 17-week oral (gavage) repeated dose toxicity study in rat. The DNEL was derived by route to route extrapolation from oral NOAEL determined for systemic effects. The calculated DNEL is 1.75 mg/kg bw/day, applying the assessment factor of 200.
The acute/short term dermal DNEL for systemic effects was not assessed, since no quantitative NOAEL could be identified. The substance showed relatively low acute oral toxicity (LD > 2000 mg/kg bw) suggesting that dermal toxicity will be identical or less hazardous, therefore no hazard was qualified based on ECHA Practical Guide 15.
The acute/short term dermal DNEL for local effects was not assessed, since no quantitative NOAEL could be identified. Low hazard for this endpoint was suggested based on ECHA Practical Guide 15 and skin irritation study, where DMI is classified into category 2.
The long term oral DNEL for systemic effects was calculated from ca. 17-week oral (gavage) repeated dose toxicity study in rat. The starting point was the systemic NOAEL = 350 mg/kg bw/day. The calculated DNEL is 1.75 mg/kg bw/day DMI, applying the assessment factor of 200.
The acute/short term oral DNEL for systemic effects was not assessed, since no quantitative NOAEL could be identified. The substance showed relatively low acute oral toxicity (LD50 > 2000 mg/kg bw), therefore no hazard was qualified based on ECHA Practical Guide 15.
No hazard for the eyes was identified, since in a reliable eye irritation study (OECD TG 405) the test item is not irritating in rabbit eye.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
