Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
sensitisation data (humans)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
From 2001-03-05 to 2001-05-24

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2001
Report date:
2001

Materials and methods

Type of sensitisation studied:
skin
Study type:
study with volunteers
Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline available
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Occlusive repeated insult patch study in humans
GLP compliance:
yes
Remarks:
Good Clinical Practices

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-{(1RS)-1-[(1SR)-3,3-DIMETHYLCYCLOHEXYL]ETHOXY}-2-METHYLPROPYL PROPIONATE
Molecular formula:
C17 H32 O3
IUPAC Name:
2-{(1RS)-1-[(1SR)-3,3-DIMETHYLCYCLOHEXYL]ETHOXY}-2-METHYLPROPYL PROPIONATE
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-{(1RS)-1-[(1RS)-3,3-DIMETHYLCYCLOHEXYL]ETHOXY}-2-METHYLPROPYL PROPIONATE
Molecular formula:
C17 H32 O3
IUPAC Name:
2-{(1RS)-1-[(1RS)-3,3-DIMETHYLCYCLOHEXYL]ETHOXY}-2-METHYLPROPYL PROPIONATE
Constituent 3
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-METHYL-2-{[(1RS,2RS)-2,6,6-TRIMETHYLCYCLOHEPTYL]OXY}PROPYL PROPIONATE
Molecular formula:
C17H32O3
IUPAC Name:
2-METHYL-2-{[(1RS,2RS)-2,6,6-TRIMETHYLCYCLOHEPTYL]OXY}PROPYL PROPIONATE
Test material form:
liquid
Details on test material:
- Physical state: clear colourless liquid
- Storage condition of test material: ambient

Method

Type of population:
general
Ethical approval:
confirmed and informed consent free of coercion received
Subjects:
- Number of subjects exposed: 108 subjects completed the study (113 were enrolled)
- Sex: males (21.2 %) and female (78.8 %)
- Age: 18.6 to 70.6
- Race: Asian (1.8 %), Black (0.9 %), Caucasian (86.7 %), Hispanic (9.7 %), Other (0.9 %)
- Demographic information: none
Clinical history:
Inclusion criteria:
- individuals free of any systemic or dermatologic disorder which, in the opinion of the investigative personnel, would have interfered with the study results
- individuals of any skin type or race providing the skin pigmentation would allow discernment of erythema.

Exclusion criteria:
- individuals with any visible skin disease at the study site which, in the opinion if the investigative personnel, would have interfered with the evaluation
- individuals receiving systemic or topical drugs or medication which, in the opinion if the investigative personnel, would have interfered with the study results
- individuals with psoriasis and/or active atopic dermatitis/eczema
- females who were pregnant, planning a pregnancy or nursing a child
- individuals with a known sensitivity to cosmetics fragrances, skin care products or topical drugs as related to products being evaluated.
Controls:
none
Route of administration:
dermal
Details on study design:
TYPE OF TEST(S) USED: patch test (epicutaneous test)

ADMINISTRATION
- Type of application: occlusive
- Description of patch: non-porous, plastic film adhesive bandage with a 2 cm x 2 cm Webril pad affixed with hypo-allergenic tape (Micropore) as needed.
- Vehicle / solvent: diethyl phtalate
- Concentrations: 20 %
- Volume applied: 0.2 mL
- Testing/scoring schedule:
Induction phase: 9 consecutive applications, 48-hour intervals (72-hour if weekend)
Rest period: 10-15 days
Challenge phase: during the 6th week of the study
- Removal of patches: approximately 24 hours after each application
- Other: patches applied to the infrascapular area of the back, either to the right or left of the midline

EXAMINATIONS
During induction sites were evaluated at 48-hour intervals (72-hour if weekend). After challenge, evaluations were done after 48 and 72 hours.
- Grading/Scoring system:
- = No reaction
? = Minimal or doubtful response, slightly different from surrounding normal skin
+ = Definite erythema. No oedema
++ = Definite erythema. Definite oedema.
+++ = Definite erythema. Definite oedema and vesiculation.
- Statistical analysis: none

Results and discussion

Results of examinations:
SYMPTOMS
- Frequency, level, duration of symptoms observed: none

NO. OF PERSONS WITH/OUT REACTIONS COMPARED TO STUDY POPULATION
- Number of subjects with positive reactions: 0
- Number of subjects with negative reactions: 108
- Number of subjects with equivocal reactions: 0
- Number of subjects with irritating reactions: 0

Any other information on results incl. tables

none

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Under the condition of the study, ST 04 C 91 is not a skin sensitiser at 20% in diethyl phtalate. The NESIL /NOAEL is determined to be 2.3 µg/cm².
Executive summary:

A panel of 108 male and female human volunteers participated in a repeat insult patch test in which a 20% solution of ST 04 C 91 in Diethyl phthalate applied to the back of the subjects under occlusive patches. During the induction phase nine patch were applied, separated by a 48-hour interval. The patches were removed 24 hours after application. Following a 14-day rest period, a challenge patch was applied and the sites scored 48 and 72 hours after application.

Under the conditions employed in this study, there was no evidence of sensitisation to ST 04 C 91 at 20%.

A No Expected Sensitisation Induction level (NESIL) or NOAEL can be derived from this study as follows:

Single 0.2 mL 20% test material induction dose (relative density = 0.938) <=>0.00938 mg

Area of exposure: 2 cm x 2 cm = 4 cm²

NESIL or NOAEL = applied dose / area of exposure = 0.00938 / 4 = 0.0023 mg/cm²= 2.3 µg/cm²

The NESIL / NOAEL is determined to be 2.3 µg/cm².