Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
22 Jan - 13 Feb 2020
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2020
Report date:
2020

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method)
Version / remarks:
Updated Guideline adopted July 29, 2016
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
In Step 1 of the test for colour interference the incubation time of the mixture with test item and isopropanol was 1 hour instead of 2-3 hours. This deviation was considered to have not affected the integrity or validity of the study.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
(4-carboxybutyl)triphenylphosphonium bromide
EC Number:
241-782-5
EC Name:
(4-carboxybutyl)triphenylphosphonium bromide
Cas Number:
17814-85-6
Molecular formula:
C23H24BrO2P
IUPAC Name:
(4-carboxybutyl)triphenylphosphonium bromide
Test material form:
solid: crystalline

In vitro test system

Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Cell type:
non-transformed keratinocytes
Cell source:
other: not reported
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Remarks:
25 μL of deionised water were applied onto the surface of duplicate EpiDerm™ tissue
Details on test system:
RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
- Model used: EpiDerm™
- Tissue lot number: 30847
- Delivery date: 11 February 2020
- Date of initiation of testing: 13 February 2020

TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: 37 ± 1.5 °C

REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS
- Number of washing steps: 20
- Observable damage in the tissue due to washing: none
- Modifications to validated SOP: none

MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: 1 mg/mL
- Incubation time: 3 h
- Spectrophotometer: microplate reader (Versamax®, Molecular Devices, SoftMax Pro Enterprise (version 4.7.1))
- Wavelength: 570 nm
- Filter: none

FUNCTIONAL MODEL CONDITIONS WITH REFERENCE TO HISTORICAL DATA
- Viability:
Specification: MTT QC assay, 4 h, n= 3
Acceptance criteria: OD (540-570 nm) <1.0 - 3.0>
Result and QA Statement: 1.968 ± 0.158 (Pass)

- Barrier function:
Specification: ET-50 assay, 100 µL 1% Triton X-100, 4 time points, n = 3, MTT assay
Acceptance criteria: ET-50 <5.77 - 8.72 h>
Result and QA Statement: 5.05 h (Pass)

- Morphology: Tissue viability and the barrier function test are within the acceptable ranges and indicate appropriate formation of the epidermal barrier, the presence of a functional stratum corneum, a viable basal cell layer, and intermediate spinous and granular layers.

- Contamination:
Specification: Long-term antibiotic and antimycotic free culture
Acceptance criteria: No contamination
Result and QA Statement: Sterile (Pass)

NUMBER OF REPLICATE TISSUES: 2

NUMBER OF INDEPENDENT TEST SEQUENCES / EXPERIMENTS TO DERIVE FINAL PREDICTION: 1

PREDICTION MODEL / DECISION CRITERIA
- The test substance is considered to be corrosive to skin if the viability after 3 minutes exposure is less than 50%, or if the viability after 3 minutes exposure is greater than or equal to 50 % and the viability after 1 hour exposure is less than 15%.
- The test substance is considered to be non-corrosive to skin if the viability after 3 minutes exposure is greater than or equal to 50% and the viability after 1 hour exposure is greater than or equal to 15%.
Control samples:
yes, concurrent negative control
yes, concurrent positive control
Amount/concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 25 ± 2 mg

NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied: 50 μL Dulbecco's Phosphate-Buffered Saline (DPBS) (MatTek), Batch 112719 ISE

POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied: 50 μL 8.0 N Potassium Hydroxide (KOH, Honeywell), Batch H3410
Duration of treatment / exposure:
3 and 60 min
Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
not applicable
Number of replicates:
2

Results and discussion

In vitro

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
3 min exposure, mean of 2 replicates
Value:
100.72
Vehicle controls validity:
not examined
Negative controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
100% tissue viability
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
12.65% tissue viability
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
60 min exposure, mean of 2 replicates
Value:
24.58
Vehicle controls validity:
not examined
Negative controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
100% tissue viability
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
1.75% tissue viability
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Other effects / acceptance of results:
- OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: none
- Direct-MTT reduction: no
- Colour interference with MTT: no

DEMONSTRATION OF TECHNICAL PROFICIENCY: The test facility has been certified to demonstrate proficiency in the EpiDerm Skin Corrosion Test (OECD TG 431) by
- correct prediction of the corrosive potential of the proficiency chemicals
- correct assignment of the chemicals into the sub-classes of corrosiveness as defined by the OECD TG 431 (i.e. 1A vs 1BC merged)

ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: yes
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: yes
- Acceptance criteria met for variability between replicate measurements: yes

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The test item is considered to be non-corrosive to skin according to EU CLP and UN GHS.