Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1994
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
Guideline study to GLP for which original study report is available.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1994
Report date:
1994

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-(2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethoxy)ethanol
EC Number:
205-592-6
EC Name:
2-(2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethoxy)ethanol
Cas Number:
143-22-6
Molecular formula:
C10H22O4
IUPAC Name:
2-(2-(2-Butoxyethoxy)ethoxy)ethanol
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
3,6,9,12-tetraoxahexadecan-1-ol
EC Number:
216-322-1
EC Name:
3,6,9,12-tetraoxahexadecan-1-ol
Cas Number:
1559-34-8
Molecular formula:
C12H26O5
IUPAC Name:
3,6,9,12-tetraoxahexadecan-1-ol
Test material form:
liquid
Details on test material:

- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Solvent 14
- Physical state: pale straw-colored liquid
- Lot/batch No.: S14/TK E120 AN 108278

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
Each animal was given a number unique within the study which was written with a black indelible marker-pen on the inner surface of the ear and on a cage label.

TEST ANIMALS
- Source: David Percival Ltd., Moston, Sandbach, Cheshire, U.K.
- Age at study initiation: 12 -16 weeks old.
- Weight at study initiation: 2.46 – 2.62 kg
- Housing: Animals were individually housed in suspended metal cages.
- Diet: STANRAB SQC Rabbit Diet, Special Diets Services Ltd., Witham, Essex, U.K. ad libitum.
- Water: Ad libitum
- Acclimation period: five days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 17-20°C
- Humidity: 49 – 59%
- Air changes: 15 changes per hour
- Photoperiod: 12 hour light/12 hour dark cycle.

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 13 December 1993 To: 6 January 1994

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not required
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- For the purpose of this study the test material was used as supplied.
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 ml
Duration of treatment / exposure:
One rabbit was initially treated.  A volume of 0.1 ml of the test material was instilled into the conjucntival sac of the right eye, formed by gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball.  The upper and lower eyelids were held together for about one second immediately after instillations, to prevent loss of the test material, and then released.  The left eye remained untreated and was used for control purposes.  Immediately after administration of the test material, an assessment of the initial pain reaction was made.
Observation period (in vivo):
Assessment of ocular damage/irritation was made approximately 1 hour and 24, 48, and 72 hours following treatment, according to the numerical evaluation given in Appendix I, (from Draize J.H. 1959, Association of Food and Drug Officials of the United States, Austin, Texas, “The Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Foods, Drugs and Cosmetics”).
Additional observations were made on days 7, 14 and 21 to assess the reversibility of the ocular effects.
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
Three.
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): no

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: Examination of the eye was facilitated by use of the light source from a standard ophthalmoscope.

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
maximum mean total score (MMTS)
Time point:
other: 48 hours
Score:
41
Max. score:
110
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 hours
Score:
1.2
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 21 days.
Remarks on result:
other: No corneal opacity remaining but one animal still showing vascularisation.
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 hours
Score:
1
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 hours
Score:
2.1
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 21 days
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 hours
Score:
1.9
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 21 days
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Dulling of the normal luster of the cornea was noted in all treated eyes one hour after treatment.  Areas of diffuse corneal opacity were noted in all treated eyes at the 24 hour observation with areas of diffuse to translucent corneal opacity at the 48 and 72-hour observations.  Areas of diffuse corneal opacity were noted in two treated eyes at the 7-day observation.  Vascularisation of the cornea was noted in all treated eyes at the 7-day observation and in one treated eye at the 14 and 21-day observations.

Iridial inflammation was noted in all treated eyes one hour after treatment and at the 24, 48 and 72-hour observations.  No other iridial effects were noted.

Moderate conjunctival irritation was noted in all treated eyes one hour after treatment and at the 24 and 48-hour observations with minimal to moderate conjunctival irritation at the 72 hour and 7 day observations.  Minimal conjunctival redness was noted in one treated eye at the 14-day observation. Two treated eyes appeared normal fourteen days after treatment.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Individual total scores and group mean scores for ocular irritation.

 Rabbit # and Sex

 1 hour

 24 hour

 48 hour

 72 hour

 7 days

 45 male  19  37  49  39  4
 44 male  19  37  37  37  25
 200 male  19  37  37  26  7
 Group Total  57 111   123  102  36
 Group Mean Score  19.0  37.0 41.0 34.0  12.0

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
The test material produced a maximum group mean score of 41.0 and was classified as a MODERATE IRRITANT (CLASS 5 ON A 1 TO 8 SCALE) to the rabbit eye according to a modified Kay and Calandra classification system. However, because of the irreversible nature of some effects, the test material was also classified as an irreversible eye irritant according to EEC labelling regulations.
Executive summary:

In a guideline (OECD 405) and GLP eye irritancy study, the substance was found to be an irreversible eye irritant. Whilst the immediate acute irritancy response was sufficient to trigger classification as a reversible eye irritant, the lesions seen were particularly persistent and vascularisation in one animal did not fully reverse during the observation period.