Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 907-996-4 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritancy: not irritating
Eye irritancy: causes irreversible eye damage.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irreversible damage)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin irritancy
In an old skin irritation study that pre-dates guidelines, rabbit skin was exposed to 2-(2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethoxy)ethanol for a period of 20 hours . Both dorsal skin and ear tissue was exposed. The dorsal skin showed slight redness but full recovery was observed within 8 days. Whilst the study did not provide the normal level of detail required for comparison with the classification criteria, the level of response seen was sufficiently slight to be able to conclude with certainty that skin irritancy is not an important characteristic of this substance and that is does not meet the criteria for classification as a skin irritant either under the EU or GHS systems.
The skin irritation potential of the ethylene glycol ether butyl series decreases with increasing molecular weight as demonstrated by the data available on the first three members of the series. Therefore, TEGBE is expected to be more irritating than TetraEGBE and using data from a study using pure TEGBE to estimate the skin irritation potential of a multi-constituent substance of TEGBE-TetraEGBE will be a conservative approach. It seems reasonable to predict by extrapolation that TetraEGBE will have skin irritation potential no worse than TEGBE and therefore the multi-constituent substance TEGBE-TetraEGBE will also show minimal skin irritation potential and that classification is not warranted.
Eye irritancy
In another guideline (OECD 405) and GLP eye irritancy study, the substance was found to be an irreversible eye irritant. Whilst the immediate acute irritancy response was sufficient to trigger classification as a reversible eye irritant, the lesions seen were particularly persistent and vascularisation in one animal did not fully reverse during the observation period. In another guideline OECD405 eye irritancy study, the substance produced marked irritation in rabbit eyes. The most severe reaction was conjunctival erythema, which averaged a response of 2.7 across all animals tested and the 24, 48 and 72 hour observations. This reaction is sufficiently severe to warrant classification as an eye irritant. Whilst the way the subsequent observations were reported is not entirely clear, it would appear that most effects had disappeared within 14 days apart from possibly slight conjunctival redness in one animal only. On the basis of these results, the substance does not warrant classification as causing irreversible eye damage.
Data is also available for the main components in separate studies. In an old eye irritation study in rabbits for which only basic results are available, 2-(2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethoxy)ethanol produced severe redness, edema and opacity which persisted for 8 days. After 8 days, scars were visible (eyelid vessels were considerably injected). Eye signs (redness, edema, opacity and scar) were scored from slight to very severe. These high scores suggest that the immediate acute response was probably strong enough to warrant classification as a severe eye irritant (R41 or H318), although the available data is not sufficiently detailed to enable this to be unequivocally determined. In a guideline OECD205 study, the substance tetrathylene glycol monobutyl ether was found cause slight corneal opacity that persistend for up to day 7. Moderate iritis was seen in one animal 72 hours after application only. Moderate or severe conjunctival redness was observed in all animals after 24 hours up to 72 hours and decreased to slight after 7 days. Moderate conjunctival chemosis was noted in all animals 24 hours after application, persisted in one animal up to 72 hours and decreased to slight after 7 days, whereas in the ether two animals chemosis decreased to slight after 48 up to 72 hours after application. Slight or moderate discharge was seen in all animals 24 hours after application. In addition small retraction in the eyelid, suppuratien, centracted pupil, discharge of blood, injected scleral vessels, circular or in a circumscribed area and marginal vascularization of the cornea in a circumscribed area were observed ever the study period. The study was only continued for up to 14 days after which not all symptoms had reversed.
In an in vitro eye irritancy test based on the HET-CAM assay, the component TEGBE was judged to pose no risk of serious damage to eyes.
Effects on eye irritation: highly irritating
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the information available, skin irritancy does not appear to be a significant characteristic of this substance and therefore labelling is not required.
For eye irritancy potential, from the data available it is clear that the acute response in terms of conjunctival effects and odema (chemosis) is sufficiently strong enough to warrant classification as a severe eye irritant (H318), although the available data is not sufficiently detailed to enable this to be unequivocally determined. However, there is also data to suggest that even when the response is less severe, the lesions are very persistent and can take more than 21 days to resolve. On this basis, classification as a severe eye irritant is warranted. It should be noted however that available data on the eye irritancy of preparations containing this substance at lower percentages suggest that the effects consistently become reversible at concentrations below 30% and eye irritancy properties become quite mild at concentrations below this. This data is appended to record .002 in chapter 7.3.2 of the IUCLID dosssier. On this basis, appropriate concentration limits for preparations are severe eye irritant (>30%, H318), eye irritant (20 -30%, H319), not classified for eye irritancy (<20%). Accordingly, this substance is classified as H318 with the indicated specific concentration limits according to Regulation Annex VI of EC1272/2008 (CLP).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.