Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 292-587-7 | CAS number: 90640-66-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods: long-term
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study acccording to OECD protocol under GLP, no deviations with impact on test results, validity criteria met.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 222 (Earthworm Reproduction Test (Eisenia fetida/Eisenia andrei))
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- no
- Test organisms (species):
- Eisenia fetida
- Animal group:
- annelids
- Details on test organisms:
- Test System Eisenia fetida (Annelida, Lumbricidae)
Reason for the selection Eisenia fetida is suitable for this kind of study and is one of the recommended species according to the guideline.
Source Breeding stock culture maintained at the test facility
Breeding Organisms of the species Eisenia fetida are bred at the test facility in covered plastic vessels containing potting compost.
Synchronisation of the Earthworms of homogeneous age and body weight were used in
earthworm population the definitive test. Synchronisation of the population was achieved by placing adult earthworms into breeding boxes and removing the adults after 4 weeks. Offspring from the remaining cocoons reached the adult age after 2 months at the earliest.
Feeding During breeding, the earthworms were fed with a litter of dried stinging nettle leaves and porridge oats. A sufficient amount of the food was provided depending on the feeding rate and the density of the earthworm population in the vessels.
Test duration 8 weeks
Number of replicates 8 replicates per control and 4 replicates per test item concentration.
Number and age of 10 adult earthworms (with clitellum) aged 2-12 months were used
the earthworms per replicate. The difference of age did not deviate by more than 1 month (see “Synchronisation”).
Body weight (actual) 0.31 to 0.52 g at the start of exposure
Adaptation Earthworms were adapted to untreated artificial soil two days prior to the test start.
Homogeneity of groups The worms were washed with demineralised water and dried gently on a paper towel. The homogeneity of the population was checked by weighing the earthworms. After confirmation of homogeneity, groups of 10 earthworms (chosen by a randomized procedure) were weighed and introduced to each test vessel. - Study type:
- laboratory study
- Substrate type:
- artificial soil
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 55 d
- Post exposure observation period:
- not applikcable
- Test temperature:
- Table 21: Environmental Conditions
Room Temperature [°C] Photoperiod [h] Light intensity [lx]
nominal 20 2 16 400 - 800
actual 18 – 23* 586 ± 107
* The temperature was above 22 °C for 6 hours in total.
- pH:
- Table 20: pH-Values, Moisture and WHCmax of the Test Media
Test item concentration
[mg/kg soil dry weight] pH-value Moisture [%] of dry weight WHCmax of artificial soil
[g/100 g DW]
day 0 day 56 day 0 day 56
Control 6.19 6.21 32.5 35.2 57.1
62.5 5.95 6.06 31.9 35.1
125 5.97 6.26 30.4 32.7
250 6.05 6.28 29.7 33.8*
500 6.15 6.30 29.7 31.3
1000 6.28 6.37 29.1 33.3*
*) Soil moisture slightly deviated by more than 10% from the initial value. This deviation is considered to have no
impact on quality and integrity of the study.
WHC = Water Holding Capacity - Moisture:
- Table 20: pH-Values, Moisture and WHCmax of the Test Media
Test item concentration
[mg/kg soil dry weight] pH-value Moisture [%] of dry weight WHCmax of artificial soil
[g/100 g DW]
day 0 day 56 day 0 day 56
Control 6.19 6.21 32.5 35.2 57.1
62.5 5.95 6.06 31.9 35.1
125 5.97 6.26 30.4 32.7
250 6.05 6.28 29.7 33.8*
500 6.15 6.30 29.7 31.3
1000 6.28 6.37 29.1 33.3*
*) Soil moisture slightly deviated by more than 10% from the initial value. This deviation is considered to have no
impact on quality and integrity of the study.
WHC = Water Holding Capacity - Details on test conditions:
- Number of replicates 8 replicates per control and 4 replicates per test item concentration.
Number and age of 10 adult earthworms (with clitellum) aged 2-12 months were used
the earthworms per replicate. The difference of age did not deviate by more than 1 month (see “Synchronisation”).
Test medium Artificial soil consisted of the following components:
- 10 % peat, air dried and finely ground
- 20 % kaolin, kaolinite content > 30 %
- 69 % air dried quartz sand (sand with > 50 % particle size of
0.05 - 0.2 mm)
- 0.40 % calcium carbonate (CaCO3) to achieve a pH of 6.0 0.5
The maximum water holding capacity, the moisture content and the pH of the artificial soil were determined. Two days before the test start the artificial soil (20 kg) was pre-moistened by adding 2280 g demineralised water to achieve a moisture content corresponding to 27 % of the maximum water capacity of the artificial soil. The moistened soil was kept covered to prevent evaporative water losses prior to the start of exposure.
Test containers Test units containing about 600 g soil dry weight were round plastic boxes with an inner diameter of 15.0 cm, corresponding to a bottom surface area of 177 cm2, and a height of 14 cm. Transparent and perforated lids enabled sufficient gas exchange, light input and prevented the test substrate from drying.
Application The appropriate test item quantity was weighed out for each test item concentration and dissolved in demineralised water.
The spiking solutions and additional demineralised water were added to the artificial soil to adjust the humidity of the artificial soil to a moisture of 54 % of the maximum water holding capacity. Subsequently, the test medium was thoroughly mixed to ensure a homogenous distribution and about 600 g soil dry weight equivalent were filled into test vessels. - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Test concentrations: 62.5, 125, 250, 500 and 1000 mg a.i./kg soil dry weight (nominal)
- Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Reference Item CARBENDAZIM Time schedule The test is conducted once every twelve months. The most recent test was carried out from February 21th to April 22th, 2014 (Study No. RBN1402).
- Duration:
- 55 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 125 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 55 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Duration:
- 55 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth
- Duration:
- 55 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Duration:
- 55 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth
- Duration:
- 55 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 250 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 55 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: confidence limits were corrected for heterogeneity and are therefore not reported
- Duration:
- 55 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth
- Remarks on result:
- other: confidence limits were corrected for heterogeneity and are therefore not reported
- Duration:
- 55 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: confidence limits were corrected for heterogeneity and are therefore not reported
- Duration:
- 55 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- ca. 167 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: confidence limits were corrected for heterogeneity and are therefore not reported
- Duration:
- 55 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EC20
- Effect conc.:
- ca. 360 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: confidence limits were corrected for heterogeneity and are therefore not reported
- Details on results:
- - Mortality at end of exposure period: none
- Total mass of adults at beginning of test:Body Weight Changes of the Adult Earthworms and - Changes in body weigth of live adults (% of initial weight) at end of exposure period:
Test item concentration
[mg/kg soil dry weight] Replicate Mean body weights per replicate Mean body weight gain of earthworms
Test start 28 days Per replicate Mean ± SD Sig.
[g] [g] [g] [%] [g] [%]
Control 1 0.40 0.50 0.10 25.0 0.13 ± 0.03 33.0 ± 7.81 –
2 0.40 0.51 0.11 27.5
3 0.40 0.53 0.13 32.5
4 0.40 0.57 0.17 42.5
5 0.41 0.51 0.10 24.4
6 0.41 0.59 0.18 43.9
7 0.41 0.53 0.12 29.3
8 0.41 0.57 0.16 39.0
62.5 1 0.41 0.54 0.13 31.7 0.12 ± 0.01 28.9 ± 4.03 No
2 0.42 0.52 0.10 23.8
3 0.40 0.51 0.11 27.5
4 0.40 0.53 0.13 32.5
125 1 0.41 0.53 0.12 29.3 0.13 ± 0.01 30.9 ± 3.24 No
2 0.40 0.54 0.14 35.0
3 0.40 0.51 0.11 27.5
4 0.41 0.54 0.13 31.7
250 1 0.41 0.57 0.16 39.0 0.14 ± 0.03 35.2 ± 8.84 No
2 0.40 0.53 0.13 32.5
3 0.40 0.58 0.18 45.0
4 0.41 0.51 0.10 24.4
500 1 0.40 0.56 0.16 40.0 0.16 ± 0.01 38.3 ± 1.52 No
2 0.41 0.56 0.15 36.6
3 0.41 0.57 0.16 39.0
4 0.40 0.55 0.15 37.5
1000 1 0.40 0.57 0.17 42.5 0.17 ± 0.05 41.5 ± 11.7 No
2 0.41 0.55 0.14 34.1
3 0.40 0.63 0.23 57.5
4 0.41 0.54 0.13 31.7
SD = Standard deviation Sig. = Statistical Significance (Williams Multiple Sequential t-test) compared to control
- No. of offspring produced: Reproduction Rate (Number of Juveniles after eight weeks)
Test item concentration
[mg/kg soil dry weight] Replicate Number of juveniles Mean ± SD CV [%] [%]
Reduction relative to the control Sig.
Control 1 141 144 ± 27.0 18.8 - -
2 149
3 142
4 162
5 119
6 95
7 177
8 169
62.5 1 137 152 ± 19.1 12.6 0 No
2 175
3 159
4 135
125 1 135 156 ± 16.5 10.6 0 No
2 150
3 168
4 170
250 1 113 120 ± 11.9 9.88 17.2 Yes
2 135
3 122
4 108
500 1 93 94 ± 6.90 7.34 34.7 Yes
2 100
3 85
4 99
1000 1 89 95 ± 21.2 22.3 34.3 Yes
2 105
3 68
4 117
SD = Standard deviation CV = Coefficient of variation
Sig. = Statistical Significance (Williams Multiple Sequential t-test) compared to the control
- No. of unhatched cocoons: not provided
- Morphological abnormalities: none
- Behavioural abnormalities: none
- Other biological observations: nothing remarkabke - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- 14 Data of Reference Item
Table 22: Reference Item - Reproduction Rate (Number of Juveniles after 56 days)
Application rate
[mg a.i./kg DW] Rep. Number of juveniles Mean ± SD CV % of control Significance*
Control 1 78 72 ± 18.9 26.2 _ _
2 71
3 102
4 47
5 71
6 45
7 75
8 86
0.5 1 79 95 ± 11.3 11.9 132 No
2 94
3 105
4 100
1 1 106 95 ± 12.0 12.6 132 No#
2 79
3 93
4 102
2 1 34 52 ± 12.7 24.4 72.2 No
2 54
3 58
4 63
4 1 0 1 ± 0.58 58.0 1.39 Yes
2 0
3 1
4 1
Rep. = Replicate a.i. = active ingredient SD = Standard deviation CV = Coefficient of variation
*) = Statistically significantly reduced compared to control (t-Test)
#) = Statistically significant but not dose-dependent promotion of reduction
According to OECD 222 significant effects of Carbendazim should be observed between 1 and 5 mg a.i./kg soil DW. - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- see attachted doc
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- This study on the effects of Tetraethylenepentamine, TEPA on the reproduction of earthworms of the species Eisenia fetida was performed according to OECD Guideline 222 (2004)
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this study, Tetraethylenepentamine, TEPA did not induce significant mortality, pathological symptoms or changes of the behaviour of adult earthworms after 28 days of exposure at all tested concentrations. The adult earthworm biomass increased in the control and at all test item concentrations without any statistically significant differences. After a further four weeks of exposure the numbers of juvenile earthworms were statistically significantly lower at the test item concentrations 250, 500 and 1000 mg test item/kg soil dry weight than in the untreated control.
Thus, the No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) of Tetraethylenepentamine, TEPA summarizing the endpoints mortality, growth and reproduction of Eisenia fetida after eight weeks of exposure in artificial soil was determined to be 125 mg test item/kg soil dry weight. The EC10-value for reproduction was determined to be 167 mg test item/kg soil dry weight and the EC20-value was 360 mg test item/kg soil dry weight. - Executive summary:
Summary
Effects ofTetraethylenepentamine, TEPA(Batch no.P0981) on mortality, growth and the reproductive potential of the earthworm speciesEisenia fetida(Annelida, Lumbricidae) were determined according to OECD Guideline 222 (2004) fromSeptember 11th to November 6th, 2014with the definitive exposure phase from September 11th to November 5th, 2014 atDr.U.Noack-Laboratorienin D-31157 Sarstedt, Germany. The study was conducted over 8 weeks with test item concentrations of 62.5, 125, 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg soil dry weight, which were mixed into artificial soil containing 10 % peat. A control using untreated artificial soil was also set up.Sexually mature earthworms were inserted into 8 control replicates and into 4 replicates per test item concentration (10 earthworms per replicate).They had an individual body weight between 0.31 and 0.52 g at the start of exposure
After 28 days of exposure in soil, no evident earthworm mortalities, pathological symptoms or changes in the behaviour of adult earthworms were observed in all treatments. Moreover, no statistically significant differences in growth (earthworm body weight gain) were observed at all test item concentrations compared to the control. After a further four weeks the reproduction rate (average number of juveniles produced per replicate) was 144 in the control and ranged from 94 to 156 in the test item treatment groups, with the size of the reduction increasing in response to dose. Compared to the control, a statistically significant reduction of reproduction was observed in the test item concentrations 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg soil dry weight. Consequently, the NOEC of the test item concerning reproduction was determined to be 125 mg/kg soil dry weight.The EC50-values for reproduction and growth could not be calculated reliably since no reduction ≥ 50 % for reproduction and growth occurred, however they exceeded 1000 mg test item/kg soil dry weight, the highest concentration tested. The EC10-value for reproduction was determined to be 167 mg test item/kg soil dry weight and the EC20-value was 360 mg test item/kg soil dry weight. The confidence limits were corrected for heterogeneity and are therefore not reported. All validity criteria specified by the test guidelines were fulfilled.
Reference
Description of key information
NOEC (56 d9: 125 mg/kg soil dw based on reproduction.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Long-term EC10, LC10 or NOEC for soil macroorganisms:
- 125 mg/kg soil dw
Additional information
The toxicity of the substance to earthworms was tested according to OECD guideline 222 (GLP).
The test was conducted with artificial soil as substrate and adult specimen of Eisenia fetida as test organisms. The tested concentrations were 62.5, 125, 250, 500 and 1000 mg test item/kg soil dry weight. The total test period was 8 weeks. After 28 days of exposure the mortality as well as symptoms of intoxication of the adult animals was recorded. After an additional exposure period of 28 days the reproduction rate (number of juveniles) was determined. Under the conditions of this study the substance did not induce significant mortality, pathological symptoms or changes of the behaviour of adult earthworms after 28 days of exposure at all tested concentrations.
The adult earthworm biomass increased in the control and at all test item concentrations without any statistically significant differences. After a further four weeks of exposure the numbers of juvenile earthworms were statistically significantly lower at the test item concentrations 250, 500 and 1000 mg test item/kg soil dry weight than in the untreated control. Thus, a No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) of 125 mg test item/kg soil dry weight based on the reproduction rate was determined. The EC10-value for reproduction was determined to be 167 mg test item/kg soil dry weight and the EC20-value was 360 mg test item/kg soil dry weight.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
