Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information



In the key dermal sensitization study performed according to the Health effects test guidelines, August 1982, EPA 560/6-82-001 with Guanidine Nitrate (a.i. 99.99%) diluted in isotonic saline, male young adult Hartley guinea pigs (10 per group) were tested using the method of Buehler. The positive control material used in the test was 2,4 -Dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB).


After dermal induction with 10 % solution of test substance, no skin reaction was observed. Challenge treatment was performed with the same concentration of 10 %. None of the animals of the test group showed any skin effects, whereas one animal of the control group showed a very slight skin reaction.


The sensitization rate at 24 h and at 48 h was 0 %.


The test article is considered to be a non-sensitizer in this study. 


 


Supporting data:


Additional supporting data from the read-across substance guanidine chloride were included to demonstrate the similar toxicological profile of both substances. Data were used to substantiate the justification for read-across, outlined in IUCILD chapter 13 of technical dossier and chapter 1.1.2 Justification for Read-across (Analogue approach) of CSR.




 

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1984-07-03 to 1984-08-27
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with national standard methods
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Health effects test guidelines, August 1982, EPA 560/6-82-001
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
; only 10 animals were used instead of 20, but as in all 10 animals clear negative results were obtained, this deviation is not considered relevant
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
Buehler test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
The Study was conducted before the the Guideline for the LLNA-Test (OECD 429 and 442A/B) has been adopted.
Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Hartley
Sex:
male
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Wilmington, MA)
- Age at study initiation: 33 days
- Weight at study initiation: 178-225 g at 15 days prior to first induction dose
- Housing: individually in stainless steel, wire mesh cages
- Diet: ad libitum, Certified Purina Guinea Pig Chow Diet 5026 (Ralstone Purina Company, Checkerboard Square, St Louis, MO)
- Water: ad libitum, continuous drip from a central line
- Acclimation period: 15 days before adminisrtation of the first induction dose

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: initially 18.9-22.2 °C, increased 22 days after arrival to 20.0-23.3 °C
- Humidity (%): 42-69 % with occasional peaks as high as 88 % during steam line adjustments and room washing
- Air changes (per hr): not specified
- Photoperiod: (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 1984-07-03 To: 1984-08-27
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
Induction: 10 % in isotonic saline
Challenge: 10 % in isotonic saline
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
Induction: 10 % in isotonic saline
Challenge: 10 % in isotonic saline
No. of animals per dose:
4 - pilot dosing
10 main test treatment
10 main test positive control
10 main test negative control
Details on study design:
PILOT STUDY FOR DOSE RANGE FINDING
4 animals; 100, 10, 1 and 0.1 % concentrations were used to assess the dermal irritation potential

Main study:
INDUCTION
topical application on the left flank
of 0.5ml of a 10 % solution/suspension in isotonic saline
under a 2.5 cm2 gauze patch for 6h;
three times at intervals of one week;
skin evaluation at 24 and 48h following patch removal

CHALLENGE
treatment and positive control animals: two doses on the left and rigth flank
negative control animals: one dose on the left flank
of 0.5ml of a 10 % solution/suspension in isotonic saline
under a 2.5 cm2 gauze patch for 6h;
one time 2 weeks after the last induction;
skin evaluation at 24 and 48h following patch removal

GRADING SYSTEM
Skin reactions were assigned scores according to the following grading system:
0 no reaction; 1 slight erythema; 2 moderate erythema; 3 marked erythema.
Results are expressed in terms of both incidence (the number of animals showing responses of 1 or greater at either 24 or 48h) and severity (the sum of the test scores divided by the number of animals tested).



Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
2,4 Dinitrochlorobenzene
Positive control results:
DNCB produced a marked response after the first induction dose, i.e. after the second and third induction and after challenge. Among the positive control animals, the incidence of skin reactions was 9/9 after 24h and 7/9 after 48h. 1/10 animals was lost due to non-compound-related death. The severity of skin reactions was 1.33 after 24h and 1.11 after 48h. Only one response, a 0.5 borderline score, was observed 24h after challenge in one negative control animal. Conclusion: In this study, 24h after challenge treatment performed with 0.1% DNCB, 100% of the animals of the test group were observed with skin reactions.
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10 % in isotonic saline
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 10 % in isotonic saline. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Key result
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10 % in isotonic saline
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 10 % in isotonic saline. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
10 % in isotonic saline
No. with + reactions:
1
Total no. in group:
9
Clinical observations:
one non-compound-related death
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 10 % in isotonic saline. No with. + reactions: 1.0. Total no. in groups: 9.0. Clinical observations: one non-compound-related death .
Key result
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
10 % in isotonic saline
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
9
Clinical observations:
one non-compound-related death
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 10 % in isotonic saline. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 9.0. Clinical observations: one non-compound-related death .
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
0.1 %
No. with + reactions:
9
Total no. in group:
9
Clinical observations:
Skin reaction
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
0.1 %
No. with + reactions:
7
Total no. in group:
9
Clinical observations:
Skin reaction
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation

PILOT STUDY AND DOSE RANGE FINDING

Concentration for induction and challenge:10%

SKIN EFFECTS IN INDUCTION

No skin reaction was observed after the first, second and third induction in the control and test animals treated with the test item at 10 % in isotonic saline.

SKIN EFFECTS IN CHALLENGE

A very slight skin reaction was observed in 1/9 negative control animals 24 h after challenge, no skin reaction observed in the test animals: Treatment at challenge was performed with the test item at 10 % in isotonic saline.

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
In this study the test substance Guanidine Nitrate is not a dermal sensitiser.
Executive summary:

In a dermal sensitization study according to the Health effects test guidelines, August 1982, EPA 560/6-82-001 with Guanidine Nitrate (a.i. 99.99%) diluted in isotonic saline, male young adult Hartley guinea pigs (10 per group) were tested using the method of Buehler. The positive control material used in the test was 2,4 -Dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB).

After dermal induction with 10 % solution of test substance, no skin reaction was observed. Challenge treatment was performed with the same concentration of 10 %. None of the animals of the test group showed any skin effects, whereas one animal of the control group showed a very slight skin reaction.

 

The sensitization rate at 24 h and at 48 h was 0 %.

The test article is considered to be a non-sensitizer in this study. 

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
1984-05-09 to 1984-06-22
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study
Justification for type of information:
Supporting information for read-across, structural analogue approach.
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
; only 10 animals were used instead of 20, but as in all 10 animals clear negative results were obtained, this deviation is not considered relevant
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: EPA TS-792 Dermal sensitisation. Health effects test guidelines, EPA, August 1982; EPA 560/6-82-001
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
Buehler test
Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Hartley
Sex:
male
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Wilmington, MA
- Age at study initiation: ca 4 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 186 to 234 g on receipt
- Housing: individually
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Certified Purina Guinea Pig Chow Diet 5026, ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 13 d quarantine

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20.6 to 24.4°C
- Humidity (%): 33 to 74%, with occasional spikes as high as 86%
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
10% in saline
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
10% in saline
No. of animals per dose:
10
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
0.1, 1, 10, 100% to determine the highest non-irritating concentration

MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 3
- Exposure period: the test compound was applied for 6 h once a week for 3 weeks during the induction phase
- Test groups: 0.5 mL 10% test substance in saline
- Control group: 0.5 mL saline (negative control), 0.5 mL 0.1% Dinitrochlorobenzene


B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: 2 weeks after 3rd induction exposure
- Exposure period: 6 h
- Test groups: 0.5 mL 10% test substance in saline
- Control group: 0.5 mL 10% test substance in saline
- Site: previously treated site on the left side + new site on the right side
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24, 48 h

Challenge controls:
To distinguish between reactions from primary irritation and sensitisation, negative controls were included which received only the challenge dose.
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
Dinitrochlorobenzene
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 10%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Key result
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 10%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
negative control
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: negative control. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Key result
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
negative control
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: negative control. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
positive control
No. with + reactions:
9
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: positive control. Dose level: positive control. No with. + reactions: 9.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Key result
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
positive control
No. with + reactions:
3
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: positive control. Dose level: positive control. No with. + reactions: 3.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Guanidine hydrochloride was not sensitising in this Buehler test.
Executive summary:

In a dermal sensitisation study performed according to the Health effects test guidelines, August 1982, EPA 560/6-82-001, which is similar to OECD guideline 406, with Guanidine hydrochloride (> 98% a.i.) in saline, 10 young male adult Hartley guinea pigs were tested using the method of Buehler. Dinitrochlorobenzene was used as positive control. The test substance was applied at a concentration of 10%.

The positive control induced the appropriate response. No sensitisation was observed for the test substance in any animals. For a test substance to be judged as positive, at least 15% of the treated animals have to be sensitised in this non-adjuvant test.

Although only 10 instead of 20 animals have been used, the study is considered reliable without restriction, as the results were clearly negative in the tested animals.                                      

In this study, Guanidine hydrochloride is not a dermal sensitiser.

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vitro
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
an in vitro skin sensitisation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo skin sensitisation study are available
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
Additional information:


In the key dermal sensitization study performed according to the Health effects test guidelines, August 1982, EPA 560/6-82-001 with Guanidine Nitrate (a.i. 99.99%) diluted in isotonic saline, male young adult Hartley guinea pigs (10 per group) were tested using the method of Buehler. The positive control material used in the test was 2,4 -Dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB).


After dermal induction with 10 % solution of test substance, no skin reaction was observed. Challenge treatment was performed with the same concentration of 10 %. None of the animals of the test group showed any skin effects, whereas one animal of the control group showed a very slight skin reaction.


The sensitization rate at 24 h and at 48 h was 0 %.


The test article is considered to be a non-sensitizer in this study. 


 


Supporting data:


Additional supporting data from the read-across substance guanidine chloride were included to demonstrate the similar toxicological profile of both substances. Data were used to substantiate the justification for read-across, outlined in IUCILD chapter 13 of technical dossier and chapter 1.1.2 Justification for Read-across (Analogue approach) of CSR.






Migrated from Short description of key information:
The skin sensitization potential of Guanidine Nitrate has been assessed in a Buehler test and no effects have been observed.

Justification for classification or non-classification

According to CLP, EU GHS (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008),

- Guanidine Nitrate is not classified for skin sensitization since the data available are conclusive and do not indicate any sensitizing properites.