Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Neither the invitro skin model nor the ocular irritation/corrosion test indicated an irritating potential of the test item.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2015
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: according to OECD 439 Study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: EC 440
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: UN GHS
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Species:
other: reconstituted human epidermis model
Strain:
other: reconstituted human epidermis model
Type of coverage:
other: Topical
Preparation of test site:
other: Not applicable
Vehicle:
other: No vehicle used
Amount / concentration applied:
The test material was crushed and ground in a mortar with pestle to improve the consistency. Each approximately 25 mg (~ 39 mg/cm exp.2 according to guideline) of the test item were applied to the tissues, wetted with 25 µL DPBS, and spread to match the surface of the tissue for a complete treatment time of 60 minutes.
VEHICLE: No vehicle used
Duration of treatment / exposure:
60 minutes
Observation period:
Not applicable
Number of animals:
Not applicable
Details on study design:
Test for Direct MTT Reduction and Colour Interference
Prior to the start of the test, the test item’s colour interference potential had to be evaluated. For this purpose 25 - 26 mg of the test item were mixed with 300 µL of deionised water. This mixture was incubated for 60 minutes at 37 ± 1.5 °C (5 ± 0.5% CO2).
The colour of test item/water mixture did not change during the incubation period compared with the colour of the pure test item. Therefore, the measurement of the OD of the test item in water at 570 nm was not required and consequently not performed.
For correct interpretation of results it was necessary to assess the ability of the test item to directly reduce MTT. For this purpose, 25 - 26 mg of the test item was added to 1 mL of MTT solution (MTT (Sigma, Germany) concentrate diluted with MTT diluent (DMEM, Gibco, Germany) (resulting: 1 mg/mL)). This mixture was incubated in the dark at 37 ± 1.5 °C (5 ± 0.5% CO2) for 60 minutes.
Since the colour did not turn blue/purple, the test item was not considered to be a MTT reducer.
Experimental Performance
Pre-warming of EpiDerm™ Tissues
One day prior to the performance, the plastic bag containing the 24-well plate with epidermal tissues was opened under sterile conditions. Under an airflow using forceps, the gauze was removed and the inserts were taken out. Any remaining agarose that adheres to the outer sides of the inserts was removed by gentle blotting on the sterile filter paper or gauze, and the tissues were placed in the empty, sterile 6-well plate. Prior to the exposure of the test item and of the controls the EpiDerm™ tissues were inspected for quality: If necessary, it was taken care, that
1. air bubbles between agarose and insert were not > 30% of the total surface,
2. liquid on top of the insert was removed with steriles cotton tips,
3. if again moisture is observed on top of the inserts after the pre-incubation or in
case of visible defects the respective skin models were discarded.
0.9 mL of the assay medium (20 – 25 °C) was pipetted into each well of sterile 6-well plates. The inserts with the EpiDerm™ tissues were placed in the upper wells, and were pre-incubated for 60 minutes in the incubator (37 ± 1.5 °C, 5 ± 1% CO2, 95 ± 5% RH). Following, the inserts were transferred from upper wells into the lower wells of the 6-well plates, and, the pre-incubation was continued for further 22.5 hours (37 ± 1.5 °C, 5 ± 1% CO2, 95 ± 5% RH).
Treatment
After pre-incubation of EpiDerm™ tissues was completed, medium was replaced by 0.9 mL of fresh medium per well. The negative and positive control, the vehicle control, and the test item were added into the insert atop the corresponding EpiDerm™ triplicate tissues. The treatment time was 60 minutes in total. Within this period the 6-well plates were put into the incubator for 35 minutes at 37 ± 1.5 °C, 5 ± 0.5 % CO2. In the remaining period the plates were placed in a sterile bench at room temperature until the end of treatment.
After the end of the treatment interval the inserts were removed immediately from the 6-well plate and tissues were gently rinsed with DPBS at least 15 times in order to remove any residual test material. After the rinsing the inserts were submerged in DPBS at least three times. Afterwards the inserts were once again rinsed with sterile DPBS from the inside and the outside. Excess DPBS was removed by gently shaking the inserts and blotting the bottom with sterile blotting paper. The tissues were carefully dried using sterile cotton tipped swap. The tissues were then transferred into new 6-well plates with 0.9 mL of fresh assay medium in the upper row. The inserts were placed in the prepared holding plate. Tissues were incubated for 22.5 hours at 37 ± 1.5 °C, 5 ± 0.5 % CO2. After incubation the inserts were transferred into new 6-wells plates containing fresh medium. Thereafter tissues were incubated for another 18 hours at 37 ± 1.5 °C, 5 ± 0.5 % CO2. The complete incubation time was 40.5 hours.

MTT Assay
On the day of testing the MTT concentrate was diluted with the MTT diluent (1 mg/mL). The remaining MTT solution was stored in the dark at 4 °C for later use on the same day. The 24-well plates were prepared before the end of the tissue pre-warming period. A volume of 300 µL of the MTT solution was added to each well and the plates were kept in an incubator (37 ± 1 °C, 5 ± 0.5 % CO2) until further use.
After the 42-hours incubation period was completed for all tissues and exposure groups, culture inserts were transferred from the holding plates to the MTT-plates. After a 3-hour incubation period (37 ± 1 °C, 5 ± 0.5 % CO2), the MTT solution was aspirated from the wells, and the wells were rinsed three times with DPBS. Inserts were transferred onto new 24-well plates. The inserts were immersed into extractant solution by gently pipetting 2 mL extractant solution (isopropanol) in each insert. The level rose above the upper edge of the insert, thus tissues were completely covered from both sides. The 24-well plate was sealed to inhibit the isopropanol evaporation.
The formazan salt was extracted for about 3 hours while shaking (~120 rpm) at room temperature.
After the extraction period was completed, the inserts were pierced with an injection needle to allow the extract to run into the well from which the insert was taken. Afterwards the insert was discarded. The 24-well plates were placed on a shaker for 15 minutes until the solution was homogeneous in colour.
Per each tissue, 3  200 µL aliquots of the blue formazan solution were transferred into a 96-well flat bottom microtiter plate from the 15 minutes exposure. OD was read in a microplate reader (Versamax® Molecular Devices, Softmax Pro, version 4.7.1) with a 570 ± 1 nm filter. Mean values were calculated from the 3 wells per tissue.


Irritant / corrosive response data:
Compared to the relative absorbance value of the negative control the mean relative absorbance value was reduced to 93.5% after exposure of the skin tissues to the test item. This value is above the threshold for irritancy of ≤ 50%. Therefore, the test item is not considered to possess an irritant potential.
Other effects:
No

Results after treatment with the test item and the controls

Dose Group

Treat-ment Interval

Absor-bance 570 nm
Tissue 1*

Absor-bance 570 nm
Tissue 2*

Absor-bance 570 nm
Tissue 3*

Mean Absor-bance of 3 Tissues

Rel. Absor-bance [%] Tissue 1, 2, and 3**

Relative Standard Deviation

[%]

Mean Rel. Absorbance

[% of Negative Control]***

Negative Control

60 min

1.993

2.064

2.064

2.040

97.7
101.1
101.1

2.0

100.0

Positive Control

60 min

0.063

0.069

0.056

0.063

3.1
3.4
2.7

6.9

3.1

Test Item

60 min

2.056

1.858

1.807

1.907

100.8
91.0
88.6

10.6

93.5

*       Mean of three replicate wells after blank correction

**       relative absorbance per tissue [rounded values]

***     relative absorbance per treatment group [rounded values]

 

The optical pre-experiment (colour interference pre-experiment) to investigate the test item’s colour change potential in water did not lead to a change in colour.

Optical evaluation of the MTT-reducing capacity of the test item after 1 hour incubation with MTT-reagent did not show blue colour.

The mean relative absorbance value of the test item, corresponding to the cell viability, decreased to 93.5% (threshold for irritancy:≤50%), consequently the test item was not irritant to skin. 

 

 

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: OECD GHS
Conclusions:
In conclusion, it can be stated that in this study and under the experimental conditions reported, Fat Yellow 3 G is not irritant to skin according to UN GHS and EU CLP regulation.
Executive summary:

This in vitro study was performed to assess the irritation potential of the test item by means of the Human Skin Model Test.

The test item passed the MTT- and the Colour Interference pre-tests.

Approximately 25 mg of the test item were applied to each tissue, wetted with 25 µL of DPBS, and spread to match the surface of triplicate tissue.

30 µL of either the negative control (DPBS) or the positive control (5% SLS) were applied to triplicate tissue each.

The test item and the positive and negative controls were washed off the skin tissues after 60 minutes treatment. After further incubation for about 40.5 hours the tissues were treated with the MTT solution for 3 hours following 3 hours extraction of the colorant from the cells. The amount of extracted colorant was determined photometrically at 570 nm.

After treatment with the negative control the absorbance values were well within the required acceptability criterion of mean OD³0.8 and ≤ 2.8 for the 60 minutes treatment interval thus showing the quality of the tissues.

Treatment with the positive control induced a decrease in the relative absorbance as compared to the negative control to 3.1% thus ensuring the validity of the test system.

The relative standard deviations between the % variabilities of the test item, the positive and negative controls in the main test were below 0.007% (threshold of the "OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals 439:In vitroSkin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method”: < 18%), thus ensuring the validity of the study.

Compared to the relative absorbance value of the negative controlthe mean relative absorbance value was reduced to 93.5% after exposure of the skin tissues to the test item. This value is above the threshold for irritancy of ≤ 50%. Therefore, the test item is not considered to possess an irritant potential.

 

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
The test was performed on 17 April 2015
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study conducted to GLP and in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do no effect the quality of the relevant results.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Species:
other: Freshly isolated bovine cornea (at least 9 month old donor cattle)
Strain:
not specified
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
Source: Schlachthof Bensheim, 64625 Bensheim, Germany
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Amount / concentration applied:
The test item was tested as a 20% suspension (w/v) in saline.
Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.75 mL
Duration of treatment / exposure:
240 minutes
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3 corneae per group (test item, negative control, positive control)
Details on study design:

SCORING SYSTEM:
Opacity measurement
The opacitometer determines changes in the light transmission passing through the corneae, and displays a numerical opacity value. This value was recorded in a table. The opacitometer OP_KiT opacitometer (Electro Design, 63-Riom France) was calibrated as described in the manual and the opacity of each of the corneae was determined by reading each holder placed in the photoreceptor compartment for treated cornea.

For equilibration and prior to application of the test item or controls, the corneae in the holder were incubated in a vertical position for about one hour at 32 ± 1 °C in a water-bath. At the end of the incubation period, the basal opacity was determined (t0). After exposure of the corneae to the test groups, after rinsing and further incubation of the corneae for two hours, the opacity value was determined again (t240).

Permeability Determination
Following to the opacity readings, the permeability was measured as an indication of the integrity of the epithelial cell sheets. After the final opacity measurement was performed, the incubation medium will be removed from the anterior compartment and replaced by 1 mL of a 0.5% (w/v) sodium fluorescein solution in HBSS. Corneae were incubated again in a horizontal position for 90 ± 10 minutes in a water-bath at 32 ± 1 °C. Incubation medium from the posterior compartment were removed, well mixed and transferred into a 96 well plate and the optical density at 490 nm (OD490) was determined with a spectrophotometer (Versamax® Molecular Devices). The absorbance values will be determined using the software SoftMax Pro Enterprise (version 4.7.1).

DATA INTERPRETATION
Opacity
The change of opacity value of each treated cornea or positive and negative control corneae is calculated by subtracting the initial basal opacity from the post treatment opacity reading (t240 – t0), for each individual cornea.
The average change in opacity of the negative control corneae is calculated and this value is subtracted from the change in opacity of each treated cornea or positive control to obtain a corrected opacity.

Permeability
The corrected OD490 value of each cornea treated with positive control and test item is calculated by subtracting the average negative control cornea value from the original permeability value for each cornea.

IVIS Calculation
The following formula is used to determine the IVIS of the negative control:
IVIS = opacity value + (15 x OD490 value)
The following formula is used to determine the IVIS of the positive control and the test item:
IVIS = (opacity value – opacity value mean negative control) + (15 x corrected OD490 value)
The mean IVIS value of each treated group is calculated from the IVIS values.
Depending on the score obtained, the test item is classified into the following category according to OECD guideline 437:

IVIS: In vitro Irritancy Score (according to OECD 437):

≤ 3 No Category (according to GHS)
> 3; < 55 No prediction can be made
≥ 55 Serious eye damaging according to CLP/EPA/GHS (Cat 1)


Criteria for Determination of a Valid Test

The test will be acceptable if the positive control gives an IVIS that falls within two standard deviations of the current historical mean (updated every three months), and if the negative control responses result in opacity and permeability values that are less than the established upper limits for background opacity and permeability values for bovine corneae treated with the respective negative control.
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Relative to the negative control, the test item Fat Yellow 3 G caused slight increase of the corneal opacity but not of the permeability. The calculated mean IVIS a was 2.20 (threshold for serious eye damage: IVIS ≥ 55). According to OECD 437 the test item is not categorized.

Results after 240 Minutes Incubation Time


Test Group

Opacity value = Difference (t240-t0) of Opacity

Permeability at 490 nm (OD490)

IVIS

Mean IVIS

Proposedin vitroIrritancy Score

 

 

Mean

 

Mean

 

 

 

Negative Control

0

0.33

0.148

0.114

2.22

2.04

Not categorized

1

0.090

2.35

0

0.103

1.55

Positive Control

108.67

0.015

108.90

111.81

Category 1

110.67

0.033

111.17

114.67

0.047

115.38

Fat Yellow 3 G

2.67

-0.023

2.33

2.20

Not categorized

0.67

0.025

1.05

3.67

-0.029

3.24

*corrected values

Interpretation of results:
study cannot be used for classification
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
In conclusion, according to the current study and under the experimental conditions reported, Fat Yellow 3 G is not categorized (GHS).
Executive summary:

This in vitro study was performed to assess the corneal damage potential of Fat Yellow 3 Gbymeans of the BCOP assay using fresh bovine corneae.

After a first opacity measurement of the fresh bovine corneae (t0), the 20% (w/v) suspension in saline of the test item Fat Yellow 3 G, the positive, and the negative controls were applied to the corneae and incubated for 240 minutes at 32± 1 °C. After the incubation phase the test item, the positive, and the negative controls were each rinsed from the corneae andopacity was measured again (t240).

After the opacity measurements permeability of the corneae was determined by measuring spectrophotometrically the transfer of sodium fluorescein after incubation in a horizontal position for 90 minutes at 32 ± 1 °C.

With the negative control (saline) neither an increase of opacity nor permeability of the corneae could be observed (mean IVIS = 2.04).

The positive control (10% (w/v) Benzalkonium chloride in saline) showed clear opacity and distinctive permeability of the corneae (mean IVIS = 111.81) corresponding to a classification as serious eye damaging (CLP/EPA/GHS (Cat 1)).

Relative to the negative control, the test item Fat Yellow 3 G caused slight increase of the corneal opacity but not of the permeability. The calculated mean IVIS a was 2.20 (threshold for serious eye damage: IVIS ≥ 55). According to OECD 437 the test item is not categorized.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Neither the invitro skin model nor the ocular irritation/corrosion test indicated an irritating potential of the test item.


Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
current guidelines applied

Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
current guidelines applied

Justification for classification or non-classification

not classified

Neither the invitro skin model nor the ocular irritation/corrosion test indicated an irritating potential of the test item.