Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 270-737-2 | CAS number: 68477-54-3 A complex combination of organic compounds obtained by the distillation of products from a steam cracking process. It consists predominantly of unsaturated hydrocarbons having carbon numbers predominantly in the range of C8 through C12.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicity to terrestrial arthropods
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to non-target arthropods on natural substrate (NTA other than pollinators)
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- See Attached Justification
- Qualifier:
- no guideline required
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model(s) used:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model description: See Field 'Attached justification'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Attached justification' - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- HC Block Type Carbon Number Concentration (%w/w)
Mono-Aromatic (MoAr) 7 2.49
8 4.24
9 66.33
10 5.12
Naphthenic Mono-Aromatic (NMAr) 9 19.58
Total 97.76
The constituents that could fit in more than one HC block, or that did not fit in any specific block, were placed in a relevant block that presented the highest toxicity. - Analytical monitoring:
- not required
- Test organisms (species):
- Folsomia candida
- Animal group:
- Collembola (soil-dwelling springtail)
- Study type:
- other: QSAR
- Total exposure duration:
- 28 d
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Remarks:
- Not required
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: LL50
- Effect conc.:
- 90 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EL10
- Effect conc.:
- 17.2 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The QSAR predicted 28-d LL50 (mortality) and 28-d EL10 (reproduction) for F. candida were 90 and 17.2 mg/lg dw respectively.
- Executive summary:
The QSAR predicted 28-d LL50 (mortality) and 28-d EL10 (reproduction) of the UVCB substance for F. candida were 90 and 17.2 mg/kg soil dw, respectively. The model used for the calculations was the PETROTOX v4.0 model. PETROTOX is a well-documented and peer reviewed model that is widely used across the chemicals industry. This substance fits within the criteria of the model and there are no reservations about the validity of the model runs. It is expected that this data is reliable with restrictions.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to non-target arthropods on natural substrate (NTA other than pollinators)
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- See Attached Justification
- Qualifier:
- no guideline required
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model(s) used:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model description: See Field 'Attached justification'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Attached justification' - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- HC Block Type Carbon Number Concentration (%w/w)
Mono-Aromatic (MoAr) 6 0.44
7 2.99
8 5.10
9 83.11
10 0.95
Naphthenic Mono-Aromatic (NMAr) 9 2.40
Di-Aromatic (DiAr) 10 1.13
n-Olefin 10 0.54
n-Paraffin (n-P) 10 0.14
11 0.33
Total 97.12
The constituents that could fit in more than one HC block, or that did not fit in any specific block, were placed in a relevant block that presented the highest toxicity. - Analytical monitoring:
- not required
- Test organisms (species):
- Folsomia candida
- Animal group:
- Collembola (soil-dwelling springtail)
- Study type:
- other: QSAR
- Total exposure duration:
- 28 d
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Remarks:
- Not required
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: LL50
- Effect conc.:
- 89.6 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EL10
- Effect conc.:
- 17.2 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The QSAR predicted 28-d LL50 (mortality) and 28-d EL10 (reproduction) for F. candida were 89.6 and 17.2 mg/kg dw respectively.
- Executive summary:
The QSAR predicted 28-d LL50 (mortality) and 28-d EL10 (reproduction) of the UVCB substance for F. candida were 89.6 and 17.2 mg/kg soil dw, respectively. The model used for the calculations was the PETROTOX v4.0 model. PETROTOX is a well-documented and peer reviewed model that is widely used across the chemicals industry. This substance fits within the criteria of the model and there are no reservations about the validity of the model runs. It is expected that this data is reliable with restrictions.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to non-target arthropods on natural substrate (NTA other than pollinators)
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- See Attached Justification
- Qualifier:
- no guideline required
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model(s) used:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model description: See Field 'Attached justification'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Attached justification' - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- HC Block Type Carbon Number Concentration (%w/w)
Mono-Aromatic (MoAr) 7 1.55
8 31.91
9 17.86
10 2.89
12 2.29
13 0.67
Di-Aromatic (DiAr) 10 1.03
13 0.28
14 0.24
15 0.28
n-Olefin 5 0.27
10 21.06
11 0.41
i-Olefin 9 0.30
Total 81.03
The constituents that could fit in more than one HC block, or that did not fit in any specific block, were placed in a relevant block that presented the highest toxicity. - Analytical monitoring:
- not required
- Test organisms (species):
- Folsomia candida
- Animal group:
- Collembola (soil-dwelling springtail)
- Study type:
- other: QSAR
- Total exposure duration:
- 28 d
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Remarks:
- Not required
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: LL50
- Effect conc.:
- 103 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EL10
- Effect conc.:
- 19.7 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The QSAR predicted 28-d LL50 (mortality) and 28-d EL10 (reproduction) for F. candida were 103 and 19.7 mg/kg dw respectively.
- Executive summary:
The QSAR predicted 28-d LL50 (mortality) and 28-d EL10 (reproduction) of the UVCB substance for F. candida were 103 and 19.7 mg/kg soil dw for short-term (LL50) and long-term effects (EL10), respectively.The model used for the calculations was the PETROTOX v4.0 model. PETROTOX is a well-documented and peer reviewed model that is widely used across the chemicals industry. This substance fits within the criteria of the model and there are no reservations about the validity of the model runs. It is expected that this data is reliable with restrictions.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to non-target arthropods on natural substrate (NTA other than pollinators)
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- See Attached Justification
- Qualifier:
- no guideline required
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model(s) used:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model description: See Field 'Attached justification'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Attached justification' - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- HC Block Type Carbon Number Concentration (%w/w)
Mono-Aromatic (MoAr) 6 0.57
7 0.19
9 0.50
12 0.98
13 0.31
Di-Aromatic (DiAr) 10 0.27
n-Olefin 5 0.63
10 62.38
11 23.68
Total 89.52
The constituents that could fit in more than one HC block, or that did not fit in any specific block, were placed in a relevant block that presented the highest toxicity. - Analytical monitoring:
- not required
- Test organisms (species):
- Folsomia candida
- Animal group:
- Collembola (soil-dwelling springtail)
- Study type:
- other: QSAR
- Total exposure duration:
- 28 d
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Remarks:
- Not required
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: LL50
- Effect conc.:
- 290 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EL10
- Effect conc.:
- 55.6 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The QSAR predicted 28-d LL50 (mortality) and 28-d EL10 (reproduction) for F. candida were 290 and 55.6 mg/kg dw respectively.
- Executive summary:
The QSAR predicted 28-d LL50 (mortality) and 28-d EL10 (reproduction) of the UVCB substance for F. candida were 290 and 55.6 mg/kg soil dw, respectively. The model used for the calculations was the PETROTOX v4.0 model. PETROTOX is a well-documented and peer reviewed model that is widely used across the chemicals industry. This substance fits within the criteria of the model and there are no reservations about the validity of the model runs. It is expected that this data is reliable with restrictions.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to non-target arthropods on natural substrate (NTA other than pollinators)
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- See Attached Justification
- Qualifier:
- no guideline required
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model(s) used:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model description: See Field 'Attached justification'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Attached justification' - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- HC Block Type Carbon Number Concentration (%w/w)
Mono-Aromatic (MoAr) 7 0.75
8 35.64
9 17.80
10 2.99
12 0.35
13 0.23
Di-Aromatic (DiAr) 10 0.22
n-Cyclohexane (n-CC6) 7 0.11
iso-Naphthenic (i-N) 8 0.10
n-Olefin 5 0.58
6 0.17
9 0.61
10 23.76
i-Olefin 6 0.21
n-Paraffin (n-P) 7 0.12
8 0.18
9 0.30
Total 84.13
The constituents that could fit in more than one HC block, or that did not fit in any specific block, were placed in a relevant block that presented the highest toxicity. - Analytical monitoring:
- not required
- Test organisms (species):
- Folsomia candida
- Animal group:
- Collembola (soil-dwelling springtail)
- Study type:
- other: QSAR
- Total exposure duration:
- 28 d
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Remarks:
- Not required
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: LL50
- Effect conc.:
- 103 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EL10
- Effect conc.:
- 19.8 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The QSAR predicted 28-d LL50 (mortality) and 28-d EL10 (reproduction) for F. candida were 103 and 19.8 mg/kg dw respectively.
- Executive summary:
The QSAR predicted 28-d LL50 (mortality) and 28-d EL10 (reproduction) of the UVCB substance for F. candida were 103 and 19.8 mg/kg soil dw, respectively. The model used for the calculations was the PETROTOX v4.0 model. PETROTOX is a well-documented and peer reviewed model that is widely used across the chemicals industry. This substance fits within the criteria of the model and there are no reservations about the validity of the model runs. It is expected that this data is reliable with restrictions.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to non-target arthropods on natural substrate (NTA other than pollinators)
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- See Attached Justification
- Qualifier:
- no guideline required
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model(s) used:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model description: See Field 'Attached justification'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Attached justification' - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- HC Block Type Carbon Number Concentration (%w/w)
n-olefin 5 0.57
9 1.24
10 76.50
11 14.84
12 1.21
Total 94.37
The constituents that could fit in more than one HC block, or that did not fit in any specific block, were placed in a relevant block that presented the highest toxicity. - Analytical monitoring:
- not required
- Test organisms (species):
- Folsomia candida
- Animal group:
- Collembola (soil-dwelling springtail)
- Study type:
- other: QSAR
- Total exposure duration:
- 28 d
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Remarks:
- Not required
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: LL50
- Effect conc.:
- 285 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EL10
- Effect conc.:
- 54.6 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The QSAR predicted 28-d LL50 (mortality) and 28-d EL10 (reproduction) for F. candida were 285 and 54.6 mg/kg dw respectively.
- Executive summary:
The QSAR predicted 28-d LL50 (mortality) and 28-d EL10 (reproduction) of the UVCB substance for F. candida were 285 and 54.6 mg/kg soil dw for short-term (LL50) and long-term effects (EL10), respectively. The model used for the calculations was the PETROTOX v4.0 model. PETROTOX is a well-documented and peer reviewed model that is widely used across the chemicals industry. This substance fits within the criteria of the model and there are no reservations about the validity of the model runs. It is expected that this data is reliable with restrictions.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to non-target arthropods on natural substrate (NTA other than pollinators)
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- See Attached Justification
- Qualifier:
- no guideline required
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model(s) used:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model description: See Field 'Attached justification'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Attached justification' - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- HC Block Type Carbon Number Concentration (%w/w)
Mono-Aromatic (MoAr) 8 1.51
9 42.57
10 7.04
Naphthenic Mono-Aromatic (NMAr) 9 0.98
10 0.36
Di-Aromatic (DiAr) 10 8.24
11 0.85
n-Olefin 5 0.22
9 0.13
10 26.65
11 4.67
Total 93.21
The constituents that could fit in more than one HC block, or that did not fit in any specific block, were placed in a relevant block that presented the highest toxicity. - Analytical monitoring:
- not required
- Test organisms (species):
- Folsomia candida
- Animal group:
- Collembola (soil-dwelling springtail)
- Study type:
- other: QSAR
- Total exposure duration:
- 28 d
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Remarks:
- Not required
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: LL50
- Effect conc.:
- 111 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EL10
- Effect conc.:
- 21.3 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The QSAR predicted 28-d LL50 (mortality) and 28-d EL10 (reproduction) for F. candida were 111 and 21.3 mg/kg dw respectively.
- Executive summary:
The QSAR predicted 28-d LL50 (mortality) and 28-d EL10 (reproduction) of the UVCB substance for F. candida were 111 and 21.3 mg/kg soil dw for short-term (LL50) and long-term effects (EL10), respectively. The model used for the calculations was the PETROTOX v4.0 model. PETROTOX is a well-documented and peer reviewed model that is widely used across the chemicals industry. This substance fits within the criteria of the model and there are no reservations about the validity of the model runs. It is expected that this data is reliable with restrictions.
Referenceopen allclose all
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Species | Substance CAS No. | LL50 / EL50 (mg/L) | EL10 (mg/L) |
Folsomia candida | 68516-20-1 | 103 | 19.8 |
Folsomia candida | 101316-62-5 | 90 | 17.2 |
Folsomia candida | 68526-56-7 | 285 | 54.6 |
Folsomia candida | 68477-54-3 | 103 | 19.7 |
Folsomia candida | 94733-07-0 | 111 | 21.3 |
Folsomia candida | 68478-10-4 | 290 | 55.6 |
Folsomia candida | 65996-79-4 | 89.6 | 17.2 |
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
