Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Workers - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
0.5 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
irritation (respiratory tract)
Route of original study:
By inhalation
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
3 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
100
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
300 mg/kg bw/day
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
300 mg/kg bw/day
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

Correction dermal NOAEL: 300 mg/kg bw/day x 100/100a = 300 mg/kg bw/day

(a % oral/dermal absorption)

AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
starting point is a NOAEL (no correction necessary)
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
2
Justification:
Sub-chronic to chronic extrapolation
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
Correction for caloric demand from rat to human
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
Factor to correct for toxicokinetic differences not related to metabolic rate (small part) and toxicodynamic differences (larger part). No substance-specific information is available to address this aspect more specifically.
AF for intraspecies differences:
5
Justification:
default assessment factor to account for difference in sensitivity among workers
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
A reliable study is available
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
No remaining uncertainties
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Workers - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - workers

The main risk to workers from handling Azodicarbonamide (ADCA) is from exposure by the inhalation route. ADCA has been classified as a respiratory sensitiser based on on occupational health data (case reports and epidemiological data of respiratory effects).

Therefore the qualitative approach (risk characterisation) is used first to define the RMMs and OCs. An inhalation DNEL has also been derived based on the results available on the respiratory toxicity of ADCA which are discussed in the report attached below. There appears to be a safe concentration of exposure to workers between 0.5 and 1.5 mg/m3 time weighted over an 8 hour work day. Therefore the inhalation DNEL has been set at 0.5mg/m3. This DNEL is used to judge the remaining/residual likelihood of risks after these RMMs and OCs are implemented.

General Population - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

General Population - Hazard via oral route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - General Population