Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
14/09/1984-19/10/1984
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Well documented report of a guideline study conducted to GLP.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1984
Report date:
1984

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.2600 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
Buehler test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulphonic acid
EC Number:
239-268-0
EC Name:
2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulphonic acid
Cas Number:
15214-89-8
Molecular formula:
C7H13NO4S
IUPAC Name:
(1Z)-N-(2-methyl-1-sulfopropan-2-yl)prop-2-enimidic acid
Details on test material:
- Name of test material: OS#63466G
- Substance type: organic
- Physical state: solid
- Analytical purity: not specified
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): not specified
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: 100%
- Purity test date: not specified
- Lot/batch No.: not specified
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: not specified
- Stability under test conditions: stable
- Storage condition of test material: not specified

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Sex:
male
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Ace Animals, Inc, Boyertown (PA), USA
- Age at study initiation: not specified
- Weight at study initiation: 300-500 g
- Housing: 5 animals/cage
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: yes (duration not specified

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18.3-23-9°C (65-75°F)
- Humidity (%): 45-55
- Air changes (per hr): not specified
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 14/09/1984 To: 19/10/1984

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Concentration / amount:
0.5 g
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Concentration / amount:
0.5 g
No. of animals per dose:
12
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS: No
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Exposure period: 6 hours
- Test groups: 1
- Control group: 1
- Site: back
- Frequency of applications: 3 times weekly
- Duration: 3 weeks
- Concentrations: 0.5 g

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: 1
- Exposure period: 24 hours
- Test groups: all
- Control group:
- Site: back (different area to induction)
- Concentrations: 0.5 g
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 6, 24 and 48 hours
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
l-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
The positive control material when tested as a 0.1% w/v suspension in 50% alcohol saline solutionwas considered to be a skin sensitizer in the albino guinea pig.

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Results
Reading:
other: all readings
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0.5 g
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
12
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: other: all readings. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 0.5 g. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 12.0. Clinical observations: none.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
Under the test conditions, the test substance when dosed as supplied was not considered to be a primary skin irritant, in the albino guinea pig.