Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro DNA damage and/or repair study
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: DNA damage and/or repair
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Chromosome aberration and sister chromatid exchange tests in Chinese hamster ovary cells in Vitro V: Results with 46 chemicals
Author:
Loveday KS, Anderson BE, Resnick MA and Zeiger E
Year:
1990
Bibliographic source:
Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 16: 272-303
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Chromosome aberration and sister chromatid exchange tests in Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro : II Results with 20 chemicals
Author:
Loveday KS, Lugo MH, Resnick MA, Anderson BE and Zeiger E
Year:
1989
Bibliographic source:
Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 13: 60-94

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 479 (Genetic Toxicology: In Vitro Sister Chromatid Exchange Assay in Mammalian Cells)
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of assay:
sister chromatid exchange assay in mammalian cells

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Dimethyl sulfoxide
EC Number:
200-664-3
EC Name:
Dimethyl sulfoxide
Cas Number:
67-68-5
Molecular formula:
C2H6OS
IUPAC Name:
dimethyl sulfoxide
Details on test material:
Test compound: Dimethylsulfoxide
CAS no.: 67-68-5
Source: Burdick and Jackson Laboratories
Purity: 99.4%

Method

Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
CHO cells were obtained from Litton Bionetics (Kensington. MD) at their fifth passage level after cloning. and were designated CHO-LB. A large stock of cells was initially prepared, and vials were stored at -80°C. To ensure karyotypic stability, cells were not used beyond the fifteenth passage after cloning. Cells were tested regularly for mycoplasma contamination using 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) fluorescence and were found to be free of mycoplasma for all experiments.
Growth and treatment conditions were based on procedures described by Galloway et al. (1985). Cells were grown and exposed to chemicals at 37°C.
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
The rat liver microsomal fraction was prepared from Aroclor 1254-induced male Sprague-Dawley rats and was combined with cofactors and culture medium to form the metabolic activation system.
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
up to 5000 µg/ml
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: water
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
other: 46 subastances were tested
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: Mitomycin C (MMC; Sigma) was used in the experiments without metabolic activation, and cyclophosphamide (CP; Sigma) was used in the experiments with activation as positive controls.
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
Without metabolic activation
Approximately 24 h after culture initiation at 1.25 x 10e6 cells per 75cm² flask, the medium was replaced and cells were exposed to the test or control chemical for 2 hours to allow interaction before bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) addition. BrdUrd was added (final concentration 10e-5 M), and incubation with the chemical continued for an additional 24 hours.

The chemical and BrdUrd were removed 26 hours after the initiation of the treatment and cells were then rinsed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.3. Fresh medium with BrdUrd and colcemid (Sigma, final concentration 10e-6 M) was added, and cells were incubated at 37 °C for an additional 2-2.5 h.

With metabolic activation
Approximately 24 hours after cultures were initiated at 1.25 v 10e6/75cm²flask, the medium was removed and cells were rinsed with PBS (pH 7.3). Serum-free medium containing cofactors and S9 fraction was added, and the cells were treated with the test chemical. Two hours after the initiation of the chemical treatment, the medium with test chemical was removed, the cells were rinsed twice with PBS, and medium with BrdUrd (final concentration 10e-5 M) was added. The cultures were incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours. Colcemid (final concentration 10e-6 M) was then added, and the incubation was continued for another 2-2.5 hours.

Cell Harvest and fixation
Approximately 2-2.5 hours after colcemid addition, the cultures were examined with an inverted microscope for signs of toxicity. Toxicity was determined by estimating the percent of confluence of the cell monolayer in treated flask in comparison with control flasks and noting the presence of mitotic cells. Immediately after the toxicity observation, cells were harvested by mitotic shake-off. The harvested cells were treated for 12 min at 37 °C with hypotonic buffer (0.03 M KCl, 0.01 M sodium citrate) and then re-suspended in three volumes of fixatives (3:1, Methanol: glacial acetic acid).
Slides were prepared, air-dried, stained for 10 min in Hoechst 33258 (0.5 µg/ml in phosphate buffer, pH 7.3), rinsed in water, and mounted in the same buffer. Slides were examined with fluorescence microscopy to assess the frequency of metaphase cells that has completed one or two cell cycle in BrdUrd, i.e., frequency of first division (M1) or second division (M2) cells, respectively. If the test chemical caused cell cycle delay, based on having a high proportion of cells still in M1, the cultures were harvested again 4 hours later. In the experiments reported here, the normal time for obtaining M2 cells was 26 hours after addition of BrdUrd (this includes 2 hours of colcemid). When the harvest time was extended because of cell cycle delay, the cells were exposed to BrdUrd for 30 hours (including 6 hours in colcemid).
Evaluation criteria:
A trend test of the SCEs per chromosome vs. the log of the concentration was used. A positive trend without a 20 % increase over the solvent control was designated “?”. If the response over from one dose was increased by at least 20 % over the control, the response was designated as weak evidence (+W) for the ability of a chemical to induce SCEs. If at least two doses showed increases of a least 20 % over the control, the result was designated as “+”. The determination of “+W” and “+” are indications not of potency but of strength of the evidence for a positive response.

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
other: > 5000 µg/ml
Additional information on results:
DMSO was tested in CHO cells to a maximum concentration of 5000 µg/ml. 
DMSO did not induce cell toxicity or cell cycle delay and did not induce an increase in the incidence of SCEs.
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Study Result: Negative
Activation Trial Trial Call
No Activation 1 Questionable
Induced Rat Liver S9 1 Negative
No Activation 2 Questionable
No Activation 3 Negative
Trial #:1   Activation: No Activation   Date: 1986-07-15 00:00:00.0   Trial Call: Questionable  
Dose No. No. Chromosomes Examined Total No. SCEs SCE / SCE / Hours in % Increase
µg/mL Cells Chromosome Cell BRDU Over Solvent
  Examined       Control
Vehicle Control:                  
Medium   100 50 1043 356 0.341 7.120 27.000 0.000
Test Chemical:   500          50 1044 465.000 0.445 9.300 27.000 30.493
1500          50 1044 372.000 0.356 7.440 27.000 4.394
5000 50 1049 377 0.359 7.540 27.000 5.293
Positive Control: Mitomycin C  0.002      50 1043 498.000 0.477 9.960 27.000 39.888
0.01 20 417 264 0.633 13.200 27.000 85.482
                   
      Trend: -0.396        
  Probability: 0.654          
Trial #:1   Activation: Induced Rat Liver S9   Date: 1986-07-15 00:00:00.0   Trial Call: Negative  
Dose No. No. Chromosomes Examined Total No. SCEs SCE / SCE / Hours in % Increase
µg/mL Cells Chromosome Cell BRDU Over Solvent
  Examined       Control
Vehicle Control:                  
Medium   100          50 1040.000 450 0.433 9.000 25.500 0.000
 
Test Chemical:   500          50 1049 494.000 0.471 9.880 25.500 8.836
1500          50 1045 506.000 0.484 10.120 25.500 11.906
5000 50 1050.000 479 0.456 9.580 25.500 5.431
Positive Control: Cyclophosphamide  0.4        50 1034 706.000 0.683 14.120 25.500 57.799
2.5 10 208.000 371 1.784 37.100 25.500 312.222
                   
      Trend: 0.868        
  Probability: 0.193          
Trial #:2   Activation: No Activation   Date: 1986-09-03 00:00:00.0   Trial Call: Questionable  
Dose No. No. Chromosomes Examined Total No. SCEs SCE / SCE / Hours in % Increase
µg/mL Cells Chromosome Cell BRDU Over Solvent
  Examined       Control
Vehicle Control:                  
Medium 100          50 1033.000 437 0.423 8.740 26.500 0.000
 
Test Chemical:   1530          50 1023 537.000 0.525 10.740 26.500 24.085
3050          50 1036 480.000 0.463 9.600 26.500 9.522
5090 50 1027.000 455 0.443 9.100 26.500 4.727
Positive Control: Mitomycin C  0.0003     50 1028 879.000 0.855 17.580 26.500 102.122
0.01 10 212.000 763 3.599 76.300 26.500 750.761
                   
      Trend: -0.007        
  Probability: 0.503          
Trial #:3   Activation: No Activation   Date: 1988-03-23 00:00:00.0   Trial Call: Negative  
Dose No. No. Chromosomes Examined Total No. SCEs SCE / SCE / Hours in % Increase
µg/mL Cells Chromosome Cell BRDU Over Solvent
  Examined       Control
Vehicle Control:                  
Medium   100          50 1035.000 371 0.358 7.420 26.000 0.000
 
Test Chemical:   500          50 1037 435.000 0.419 8.700 26.000 17.025
1000          50 1036 375.000 0.362 7.500 26.000 0.981
1500          50 1042 361.000 0.346 7.220 26.000 -3.349
3000 50 1047.000 403 0.385 8.060 26.000 7.380
Positive Control: Mitomycin C  0.002      50 1028 722.000 0.702 14.440 26.000 95.934
0.01 10 208.000 420 2.019 42.000 26.000 463.316
                   
      Trend: -0.296        
  Probability: 0.617          

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative

Under these experimental conditions, DMSO did not induce an increase of the incidence of SCE.
Executive summary:

The potential of Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) to induce Sister Chromatic Exchanges in CHO cells was evaluated according to a protocol similar to the OECD guidelines 479. CHO cells were treated with and without metabolic activation at concentrations up to 5000 µg/ml. In the absence of limitations on solubility or toxicity, the maximum test chemical concentration was 5 mg/ml. In tests without metabolic activation, cell cultures were exposed to DMSO for 24 hr. In tests with metabolic activation, cultures were exposed to DMSO and rat liver S-9 for 2 hr. Cell toxicity was determined by comparing cell monolayer in treated flasks with control cultures. Mitotic cells were harvested, treated with hypotonic buffer, and re-suspended in fixative. Slides were stained and 50 second-division M2 cells from each of the top three concentrations were scored for SCEs.

DMSO did not induce cell toxicity or cell cycle delay, and did not induce an increase in the incidence of SCEs.