Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 215-213-6 | CAS number: 1313-96-8
Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 14 September 2009 to 12 April 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
- Report date:
- 2010
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (Urinalysis was not performed on the samples collected from five randomly selected males at the terminal sacrifice. Food was not withheld overnight prior to blood sampling. These deviations are considered to have no impact on the validity of the study.)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Diniobium pentaoxide
- EC Number:
- 215-213-6
- EC Name:
- Diniobium pentaoxide
- Cas Number:
- 1313-96-8
- Molecular formula:
- Nb2O5
- IUPAC Name:
- diniobium(5+) pentaoxidandiide
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Test System
Young healthy male and nulliparous, non pregnant female rats [strain: Wistar Crl:WI] (Full-Barrier), were used in this study. The animals were derived from a controlled full barrier maintained breeding system (SPF) (Source: Charles River, 97633 Sulzfeld, Germany).
According to Art. 9.2, No.7 of the German Act on Animal Welfare the animals were bred for experimental purposes.
At the beginning of the study, the age of the animals was 8-9 weeks. The range of the body weight was:
Females: 158.3-194.8 g, (mean: 176.82 g, ± 20%= 35.36 g)
Males: 236.1-275.4 g, (mean: 254.82 g, ± 20%= 50.96 g)
Housing and Feeding Conditions
After an adequate acclimatisation period (at least five days) the animals were barrier maintained (full-barrier) in air conditioned rooms under the following conditions:
- Temperature: 22 ± 3 °C
- Relative humidity: 55 ± 10%
- Artificial light, sequence being 12 hours light, 12 hours dark
- Air change: 10 x / hour
- Free access to Altromin 1324 maintenance diet for rats and mice
- Free access to tap water, sulphur acidified to a pH of approximately 2.8 (drinking water, municipal residue control, microbiol. controlled periodically)
- housed individually in IVC cages, type III H, polysulphone cages on Altromin saw fibre bedding
Certificates of food, water and bedding are filed at BSL BIOSERVICE.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- Dosage
Based on the available information from other toxicity studies and in consultation with sponsor following doses were selected:
Control: 0 mg/kg bw/day
LD: 250 mg/kg bw/day
MD: 500 mg/kg bw/day
HD: 1000 mg/kg bw/day
The highest dose level was chosen with the aim of inducing toxic effects but not death or severe suffering. Thereafter, a descending sequence of dose levels is selected with a view to demonstrate any dosage related response and no observed adverse effect (NOAEL).
The animals in the control group were handled in an identical manner to the test group subjects and received the vehicle in the volume same as treated groups.
Administration of Doses
The animals were dosed with the test item on 7 days per week basis. The test substance was administered daily during 14 days pre mating and 14 days mating in both male and in female, during gestation period and up to post natal day 3 in females. Males were dosed for 28-29 days.
The test item was administered by gavage using a gavaging canula. The maximum dose volume administered was 10 mL/kg body weight.
For each animal the individual dosing volume was calculated on the basis of the most recently measured body weight. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- All formulation samples were stored frozen (approximately -20°C) till the shipment to analytic laboratory and analysis is performed.
The dose formulation analysis was performed at CURRENTA GmbH & Co. OHG Services Analytik Building Q 25, 51368 Leverkusen, Germany. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Males: 28-29 days.
Females: maximum 54 days - Frequency of treatment:
- 7 days per week
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10
- Control animals:
- yes
- Positive control:
- no
Examinations
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- General clinical observations were made twice a day except during weekend and holidays where observations were made only once, approximately at the same time each day and considering the peak period of anticipated effects after dosing.Pertinent behavioural changes, signs of difficult or prolonged parturition and all signs of toxicity, including mortality were recorded.
Once before the first exposure, and once a week thereafter, detailed clinical observations were made in all animals outside the home cage in a standard arena. Clinical observations included spontaneous activity, lethargy, recumbent position, convulsions, tremors, apnoe, asphyxia, vocalisation, diarrhoea, changes in the skin and fur, eyes and mucous membranes (salivation, discharge), and piloerection and pupil size. Changes in gait, posture, response to handling as well as the presence of clonic or tonic movements, stereotypies, difficult or prolonged parturition or bizarre behaviour was recorded.
Sensory reactivity to different modalities, grip strength and motor activity assessments and other behaviour observations were conducted on five randomly selected males and females from each group. Observations were occurred during the last week of treatment in males and on day 3 of the lactation in females (only lactating females were evaluated).
The animals were weighed at randomisation, males weekly during the entire study period and at terminal sacrifice. Females were weighed weekly during pre mating period, on gestation day 0, 7/8, 14, 20 and on PND 1 (within 24 hours of parturition) and 4 along with pups.
Food consumption was measured on corresponding day of body weight after beginning of the dose administration. Food consumption was not measured during mating period. - Litter observations:
- Each litter was examined as soon as possible after delivery of the dam to establish the number and sex of pups, stillbirths, live births, runts and the presence of gross abnormalities.
- Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- All survived male animals were sacrificed on day 29 and 30. Non pregnant females were sacrificed on the respective day 26 after the sperm positive vaginal smear as an evidence of mating. Lactating females along with pups were sacrificed on respective post natal day 4.
- Statistics:
- Parameters like body weight change and food consumption was calculated for each animal as the difference in weight measured from one week to the next. The relative organ weights were calculated in relation to the body weight (measured at necropsy) and presented as percentage.
All results are reported in tabular form (summarized in mean or summary tables and listed in individual data tables). Mean body weights are also presented as figures.
Analytical results and histopathological findings are presented in separate phase-reports attached to this report.
For statistical analysis one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test was carried out to reveal any differences between control and test groups. Statistical analysis performed with GraphPad Prism V.x software (p<0.05 was considered as statistical significant).
In the evaluation of laboratory parameters, all values within a range of the mean value ± the two fold standard deviation (x ± 2s) are considered to be "normal“ values within a "normal“ population. - Reproductive indices:
- calculated
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
General toxicity (P0)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
Reproductive function / performance (P0)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
Details on results (P0)
No test item related clinical observations and mortalities were observed in male and
female animals during the entire period of the study. One female animal from low dose (18) was found dead on gestation day 15 due to gavaging error which was confirmed by microscopic evaluations and therefore not attributed to the treatment.
Detailed Clinical Observations/Functional Observation Battery
No relevant differences were observed concerning functional and behavioural examinations in male and females.
No abnormalities were recorded concerning posture, gait, palpebral closure, lacrimation, piloerection, arousal and vocalization.
No convulsions, tremors, stereotypy or bizarre behaviour were observed in animals of any groups.
For supported and unassisted rears, no abnormalities were detected. Responses to reflex testing were normal in all groups.
On measures such as counts of urination and defecation differences could not be detected.
Body Weight and Body Weight Change
In males, no effect on body weight and body weight change was observed through out the study period in treated groups when compared with controls.However, statistically significant decrease in overall body weight change during premating day 1 to terminal sacrifice was observed in mid dose group when compared with controls. Due to lack of dose dependency, this effect could be considered incidental and indicates no toxicological significance.
In females, statistical analysis of body weight and body weight change data revealed no difference during premating, gestation and lactation period except increase in body weight change during gestation period 0-7/8 in mid dose group as compared to controls. As increase was marginal and due to lack of dose dependency no toxicological relevance can be attributed to this finding.
Food consumption
In males, statistically significant decrease in food consumption during post mating period 1-7 was observed in low and mid dose group as compared to controls. However, lack of consistent and dose dependent pattern of effect on food consumption in treated groups indicates no toxicological relevance.
In females, No effect on food consumption was observed in treated groups during premating, gestation and lactation period as compared to controls.
Litter Weight Data
Statistical analysis of litter weight data revealed decrease in male litter weight on PND 0 in low and mid dose group and on PND 4 in low dose group. However, neither dose dependency nor an effect on group mean litter weight, total litter weight and female litter weight on PND 0 and PND 4 was observed when compared with controls. Therefore, this effect can not be considered as test item related.
Precoital Interval, Duration of gestation and fertility Index
No treatment related effect was observed on precoital interval, duration of gestation when compared with controls and values were comparable between the groups. All pregnancies resulted in normal births.
Successful mating resulted in 9, 10, 8 and 10 pregnancies in control, low mid and high dose respectively.
Reduced fertility index (No. of pregnant females/No. of copulated females X 100) was observed in control (90%) and mid dose group (80 %) as compared to low (100 %) and high dose group (100 %).
Effect levels (P0)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- reproduction
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No adverse and treatment-related effects were observed
Results: F1 generation
General toxicity (F1)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Sexual maturation:
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- no effects observed
Details on results (F1)
No treatment related effect was observed on litter data such as total number of pups born, live pups, No.of female pups, still birth and runt on PND 0 and total No. of live pups and No. of female pups on PND 4.
No statistically significant effect on survival of the pups from PND 0 to PND 4 was observed in any treatment group when compared with controls.
One pup (Pup No. 1 male) from female No. 35 and two pups (pup no 4 male and 10 female) from female No 36 of high dose group were found dead on PND 1. Gross necropsy findings of found dead pup revealed no specific findings.
Effect levels (F1)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- developmental toxicity
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No adverse and treatment-related effects were observed.
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
Any other information on results incl. tables
Reproductive Indices
Copulation Index (%)= (No. of rats copulated /No.of pairs)X 100 Fertility Index (%)= (No. of Females Pregnant/No.of females copulated)x 100 Delivery Index(%)= (No. of dams with live newborns/ No.of pregnant dams)X 100 Viability Index (%)= (No. of live offspring at day 4/ No.of live offspring at birth)x 100 No. of live offspring at day 4/ No.of live offspring at birth)x 100
Macroscopic Findings - Male
Macroscopic Findings- Female
Tabular Study Summary
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, the repeated dose administration of Diniobium Pentaoxide (Nb2O5) in deionised water to the male (28-29 days) and female (maximum 54 days) Wistar rats at dosages of 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day revealed no major toxicological findings.
Based on the data generated from this combined repeated dose toxicity and reproduction/ developmental toxicity screening test with Diniobium Pentaoxide, the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) is believed to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day in males and females.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
