Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
Coupling reaction products of diazotized 2-amino-6-[(2-substitued ethyl)sulfonyl]naphthalene-1-substituted acid with 4-({4-chloro-6-[ethyl(3-{[2-(substituted oxy)ethyl]sulfonyl}phenyl)amino]-heteromonocycl-2-yl}amino)-5-hydroxynaphthalene-2,7-disubstituted acid and their sodium and potassium salts
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
The aims of testing for genotoxicity are to assess the potential of substances to induce genotoxic effects which may lead to cancer or cause heritable damage in humans.
According to the intelligent testing strategy proposed in the ECHA Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R.7a the first test to conduct is a Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay (Ames Test). In this test, two of the five tester strains used gave positive results after incubation with the test material without metabolic activation. The respective tester strains were S. typhimurium TA98, being sensitive for frame-shift mutations, and TA100, indicating base-pair substitutions.
To confirm this finding, a mutation assay on mammalian cells (HPRT Test) was performed on V79 (Chinese hamster lung fibroblast) cells. In this assay, FAT40850/ATE did not induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus, contradicting the aforementioned results.As the results of mammalian tests may be considered of higher significance than results from bacterial tests, one can conclude that the potential of FAT40850/A TE to induce mutations in mammals is quite low.
Beside gene mutations, chromosomal aberrations may be the cause of many human genetic diseases. In an in vitro mammalian cell chromosomal aberration test, FAT40850/A TE was found to induce structural chromosome aberrations in V79 cells. As mentioned in REACH Regulation Annex IX, it is proposed to perform an in vivo micronucleus test to further investigate the clastogenic potential of the test material.
Short description of key information:
To date, three different in vitro studies on genotoxicity/mutagenicity of the test material are available:
Sokolowski (2010): In a Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli Reverse Mutation Assay (Ames Test), FAT40850/A TE showed positive results without metabolic activation in two of the five tester strains used, i.e. TA98 and TA100, which indicate frame-shift mutations and base-pair substitution, respectively.
Hall (2010): The test item FAT40850/A TE induced structural chromosome aberrations in V79 cells (Chinese hamster cell line) in vitro.
Wollny (2010): The test item FAT40850/A TE did not induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus in V79 cells.
Endpoint Conclusion:
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification of a substance as germ cell mutagen is mainly based on the results of in vivo tests. To date, only results from in vitro tests are available. These indicate that the test material may not be a mutagen according to the negative findings in the HPRT test (Wollny 2010). Regarding clastogenicity, no unequivocal result can be given that satisfies the needs of the respective classification regulations. It has to be stated that the in vitro chromosomal aberration test in mammalian cells was positive but this finding has first to be confirmed with the proposed in vivo micronucleus test.
Taken together, the test material is not yet classified as germ cell mutagen but due to the ambiguous results and the in vivo study to be performed “inconclusive” is entered as reason for no classification.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.