Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

In the in vivo skin irritation study, conducted according to a protocol similar to OECD Test Guideline 404 but prior to GLP, trimethoxy(methyl)silane was not irritating to intact skin following 24-hour occluded dermal application (Hazelton Laboratories, 1966).

In an in vivo eye irritation study conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 405 and in compliance with GLP, trimethoxy(methyl)silane was non-irritant to rabbit eyes (Hoechst, 1991).

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1966
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
This study generally follows current guidance for conducting skin irritation studies, but certain details regarding study conduct are missing. In addition, abraded skin was evaluated (only intact skin should be evaluated) and the study was not conducted under GLP.
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
occlusive dressings used
GLP compliance:
no
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
other: intact and abraded
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not specified
Amount / concentration applied:
undiluted
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 hour(s)
Number of animals:
6
Details on study design:
Six albino rabbits of either sex, weighing from 2.1 to 2.7 kg, were used  to evaluate the primary skin irritation of the test material.  
The animals were divided into two groups, three with intact and three with abraded skin.  
The test material was applied to six one-inch square gauze  patches in the amount of 0.5 ml per patch.  
The patches were applied to  the back of each rabbit, and the patches backed with adhesive tape and  covered with a protective tape layer. 
After 24-hours the patches were  removed and the test sites observed for irritation.  The sites were re- examined at 72 hours, the animals weighed 
and the study terminated.
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: intact skin
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: intact skin
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: no effects
Remarks on result:
other: intact skin
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: no effects
Remarks on result:
other: intact skin
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Remarks on result:
other: Individual animal scores were not given in the study report.
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Remarks on result:
other: Individual animal scores were not given in the study report.
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Remarks on result:
other: Individual animal scores were not given in the study report.
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Remarks on result:
other: Individual animal scores were not given in the study report.
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Remarks on result:
other: Individual animal scores were not given in the study report.
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Remarks on result:
other: Individual animal scores were not given in the study report.

The average values for erythema and edema obtained from the
three abraded (A) and three intact (I) areas are presented
below:

  24 hours    72 hours   
  Erythema   Edema Erythema  Edema   
Abraded  1.0  0.33  0.33   
Intact  1.0  0   


Based on a PDII of 0.66, this material is considered to be slightly irritating to rabbit skin.

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
In the in vivo skin irritation study, conducted according to a protocol similar to OECD Test Guideline 404 but prior to GLP, trimethoxy(methyl)silane was not irritating to intact skin following 24-hour occluded dermal application.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
08.10.1991 to 18.10.1991
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS

- Source: Hoechst AG

- Age at study initiation: 3-5 months

- Weight at study initiation: 3.1 - 3.9 kg

- Housing:

- Diet: Altromin 2123 ad libitum

- Water: deionised tap water ad libitum



ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS

- Temperature (°C): 18 +/- 3 °C

- Humidity (%): 55 +/- 20%


- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not required
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL

- Amount(s) applied: 0.1 ml

- Concentration: Neat
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 hours
Observation period (in vivo):
72 hours
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3
Details on study design:
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: fluorescein (0.01% )
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Mild to moderate conjunctival redness and discharge were observed in all test animals 1 hour post-instillation. Mild chemosis was also observed at this time point. All effects were fully resolved by the 24-hour observation.
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
In an in vivo eye irritation study conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 405 and in compliance with GLP, trimethoxy(methyl)silane was non-irritant to rabbit eyes.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

In the key in vivo skin irritation study (Hazelton Laboratories, 1966), conducted according to a protocol similar to OECD Test Guideline 404 but prior to GLP, trimethoxy(methyl)silane was not irritating to intact skin following 24-hour occluded dermal application.

A second study on skin irritation is also available, (Mellon Institute, 1963) in which the results were consistent with the key study.

The key study for eye irritation found the test material non-irritating to the eyes of rabbits, in a study conducted in accordance with OECD 405 and in compliance with GLP (Hoechst, 1991). Mild to moderate conjunctival redness and discharge were observed in all test animals 1-hour post-instillation. Mild chemosis was also observed at this time point. All effects were fully resolved by the 24-hour observation.

A supporting study by the Mellon Institute (1963) was also available, reporting Grade 2 corneal necrosis determined according to a protocol which was lacking in detail on the study conduct, and was not compliant with GLP, using an excess amount of test material.

A second supporting study found the test substance slightly irritating in a reliable study conducted according to an appropriate test protocol, but not compliant with GLP (Hazelton Laboratories, 1966). The observed effects do not meet the criteria for classification as an eye irritant.

Finally, a reliability 4 supporting study was also available which found the test material slightly irritating, but which does not meet current guideline requirements (Laboratoires de Recherches de la Societe des Usines Chimiques Rhone-Poulenc, 1972). The result does, however, add to the weight of evidence for eye irritation. The observed effects do not meet the criteria for classification as an eye irritant in the EU.


Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the available data trimethoxy(methyl)silane does not require classification for irritation according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.