Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 600-975-8 | CAS number: 110615-47-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1990-12-20 to 1991-03-27
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP study with acceptable restriction.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 991
- Report date:
- 1991
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Colony sizing procedures were not described, and colony size was not reported for the negative and positive controls. The purity and the stability of the test substance under assay conditions were not provided.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- D-Glucopyranose, oligomers, decyl octyl glycosides
- EC Number:
- 500-220-1
- EC Name:
- D-Glucopyranose, oligomers, decyl octyl glycosides
- Cas Number:
- 68515-73-1
- IUPAC Name:
- 68515-73-1
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): MV#2725-153 (Alkylpolyglycoside)
- Physical state: light, yellow liquid (sponsor); clear, straw-colored liquid (testing laboratory)
- Analytical purity: No data
- Lot/batch No.: No data
- Storage condition of test material: room temperatur in the dark
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- thymidine kinase locus
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: Fischer's Medium for Leukemic Cells of Mice with 0.1 % Pluronics (treatment medium); supplemented with 10 % horse serum and 4 mM L-glutamine (expression period medium). Cloning medium was treatment medium with 20 % horse serum and 0.25 % agar.
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: N/A
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: N/A
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: heterozygous at the thymidine kinase locus (TK +/-); clone 3.7.2C
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1242 and Aroclor 1254 (2:1 mixture) induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Mutation assay:
Trial 1: w/ metabolic activation: 13-1004 ug/mL - data only presented for concentrations up to 179 ug/mL due to higher doses prohibiting cloning
w/o metabolic activation: 7.5-565 ug/mL - data only presented for concentrations up to 101 ug/mL due to higher doses prohibiting cloning
Trial 2: w/ metabolic activation: 103-260 ug/mL - data only presented for concentrations up to 234 ug/mL due to higher doses prohibiting cloning - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: sterile, distilled water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: solubility
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Remarks:
- N/A
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- sterile distilled water
- True negative controls:
- no
- Remarks:
- N/A
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- N/A
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
Migrated to IUCLID6: 0.5 and 0.25 ul/ml
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Remarks:
- N/A
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- sterile, distilled water
- True negative controls:
- no
- Remarks:
- N/A
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- N/A
- Positive control substance:
- 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
Migrated to IUCLID6: 5 and 2.5 ug/ml
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 hours
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 2 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 10-12 days
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): Cells were harvested after the selection time.
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): trifluorothymidine
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 1 tube was treated per test substance group and positive control group; 2 tubes were treated for the solvent control group. 3 plates with selection agent and 3 plates without selection agent were plated per treatment tube.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: the mutant frequency was expressed as the number of mutants per 1.0 E6 clonable cells.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: % Total Growth= (% suspension growth x % cloning growth) x 100
OTHER: for expression of the mutant phenotype, the cultures were counted and adjusted to 3.0 E5 cells/ml (if the cell population exceeded 3.0 E5 cells/ml) at approximately 24 and 48 hours after treatment in 20 and 10 ml total volume, respectively. - Evaluation criteria:
- The following criteria were used as guidelines in judging the significance of the activity of the test substance in the system. In evaluating the results, it was considered that increases in mutant frequencies, which occurred only at highly toxic concentrations, may have been due to epigenetic events. However, it was impossible to formulate criteria which could apply to all types of data which may have been generated and therefore the scientist's evaluation was the final endpoint.
1. Positive-if there was a positive dose response and one or more of the three highest doses in the 0% or greater Total Growth range exhibited a mutant frequency which was two-fold greater than the background level. All data including that from cultures with less than 10% Total Growth would be used to establish the dose response relationship.
2. Equivocal-if there was no dose response but any one or more of the three highest doses with 10% or greater Total Growth exhibited a two-fold increase in mutant frequency over background, or if there was a dose response but no culture exhibited a two-fold increase in mutant frequency over background.
3. Negative- if there was no dose response in cultures with 10 % or greater Total Growth and none of these test cultures exhibited a two-fold or greater increase in mutant frequency over background.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- N/A
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- see remarks on results
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
The optimal dose levels for the mutagenicity assays were selected following a preliminary toxicity test based on cell population growth relative to the solvent controls. L5178Y cells were exposed to solvent alone and seven concentrations of the test substance ranging from 5013 to 0.01 ug/ml for 4 hours in the absence and presence metabolic activation. Each tube was gassed with 5 +/- 1 % CO2 in air and placed on a Bellco roller drum apparatus rotating at approximately 25 rpm. The final solvent concentration in the culture medium was 1 % by volume. The test solutions were prepared under amber light s and kept in darkness during the entire exposure period. After approximately 4 hours, the test substance in solution was removed by centrifuging the cells at 1000 rpm for 10 minutes and decanting the supernatant. The cells were washed twice in 10 ml of medium (containing serum), resuspended in 20 ml of medium (containing serum), gassed with 5 +/- 1 % CO2 in air, and replaced on the roller drum apparatus. Cell population density was determined 24 and 48 hours after the initial exposure to the test substance by removing a sample from each treatment tube, diluting in 0.1 % trypsin, incubating at 37 +/- 1 degrees C for 10 minutes, and counting the samples with an electronic cell counter. The cultures were adjusted to 2.0 E5 cells/ml (if the cell population exceeded 3.0 E5 cells/ml) after 24 hours, only.
The toxicity test indicted 100 % toxicity at 1003 ug/ml for both the non-activated cultures and for the activated cultures.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: See below - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'. Remarks: N/A
Any other information on results incl. tables
After a two day expression period ten doses of the non-activated and the activated cultures were selected for cloning. The non-activated cultures were cloned with 101, 75, 57, 42, 32, 24, 18, 13, 10 and 7.5 ug/ml which produced a range in suspension growth of 39% to 100%. The activated cultures were cloned with 179, 134, 101, 75, 57, 42, 32, 24, 18 and 13 µg/mL. these concentrations produced a range in suspension growth of 61% to 106%.
None of the non-activated cultures that were cloned exhibited a mutant frequency which was at least two times the mean mutant frequency of the solvent controls. The total growths of these cultures ranged from 39% to 104%. A dose-dependent response was not noted in the treated cultures.
None of the activated cultures that were cloned exhibited a mutant frequency which was at least two times the mean mutant frequency of the solvent control. The total growths of these cultures ranged from 68% to 117%. A dose-dependent response was note noted in the treated cultures.
In the second trial the activated cultures cloned were treated with 234, 229, 225, 221, 210, 199, 189, 180, 171 and 161 µg/mL.. These concentrations produced a range in suspension growth of 12% to 71%. None of these cultures exhibited a mutant frequency which was at least two times the mean mutant frequency of the solvent control. The total growths of these cultures ranged from 11% to 73%. A significant dose-dependent response was not noted in the treated cultures.
The solvent and positive controls fulfilled the requirements for a valid test.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative with and without metabolic activation
D-Glucopyranose, oligomeric, decyl octyl glycosides was evaluated in the L5178Y TK+/-Mouse Lymphoma Mutagenesis Assay in the absence and presence of Aroclor-induced rat liver S9. Under the conditions of the assay, the test substance was found to be negative for mutagenic activity. - Executive summary:
D-Glucopyranose, oligomeric, decyl octyl glycosides (alkylpolyglycoside, 20% in ethanol) was evaluated in the L5178Y TK +/-Mouse Lymphoma Mutagenesis Assay in the absence and presence of Aroclor-induced rat liver S9. The assay was performed in two phases. The first phase, the preliminary toxicity assay, was used to establish the dose range for the mutagenesis assay. The second phase, the mutagenicity assay, was used to evaluate the mutagenic potential of the test substance. In the preliminary toxicity assay, the test substance was evaluated for its effects on the growth of L5178Y TK +/- cells at concentrations ranging from 5013 to 0.01 µg/mL in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation. The preliminary toxicity test indicated 100% toxicity at 1003 µg/mL for both the non-activated and the S9 activated cultures. Based on the results of the toxicity test, dose levels ranging from 565 to 7.5 µg/mL were chosen to be tested without S9 metabolic activation and dose levels ranging from 1004 to 13 µg/mL were tested with S9 metabolic activation. The S9 activated portion was repeated over a range from 260 to 103 µg/mL to achieve lower Total Growths. After a 4-hour treatment period and a two-day expression period, ten doses of the non-activated and the S9 activated cultures were selected for cloning. The non-activated cultures were cloned with 101, 75, 57, 42, 32, 24, 18, 13, 10, and 7.5 µg/mL, which produced a range in Suspension Growth of 39% to 100%. The S9 activated cultures were cloned with 179, 134, 101, 75, 57, 42, 32, 24, 18, and 13 µg/mL. These concentrations produced a range in Suspension Growth of 61% to 106%.
None of the non-activated cultures that were cloned exhibited a mutant frequency which was at least two times the mean mutant frequency of the solvent controls. The Total Growths of these cultures ranged from 39% to 104%. A dose-dependent response was not noted in the treated cultures.
None of the S9 activated cultures that were cloned exhibited a mutant frequency which was at least two times the mean mutant frequency of the solvent controls. The Total Growths of these cultures ranged from 68% to 117%. A dose-dependent response was not noted in the treated cultures.
In the second trial the S9 activated cultures were cloned with 234, 229, 225, 221, 210, 199, 189, 180, 171, and 161 µg/mL. These concentrations produced a range in Suspension Growth of 12% to 71%. None of these cultures exhibited a mutant frequency which was at least two times the mean mutant frequency of the solvent controls. The Total Growths of these cultures ranged from 11% to 73%. A significant dose-dependent response was not noted in the treated cultures.
The solvent and positive controls fulfilled the requirements for a valid test.
Under the conditions of the assay described in the study report, the test substance was found to be negative in both the absence and presence of exogenous metabolic activation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.