Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: other routes
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
other information
Study period:
06. Jan 1965 - 19. Jan 1965
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1965
Report date:
1965

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
other: BASF-Test
GLP compliance:
no
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Diisopropanolamine
IUPAC Name:
Diisopropanolamine
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Diisopropanolamin

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
other: Tuebinger-Mice
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: male: 36 g (mean), female: 28 g (mean)

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
intraperitoneal
Vehicle:
not specified
Doses:
200, 250, 320, 400, 800, 1600 mg/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
not specified

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
ca. 350 mg/kg bw
Mortality:
1600 mg/kg: all animals died within the first 24 h.
800 mg/kg: all animals died within the first 24 h.
400 mg/kg (8%): 3 males died n the first day, 1 on the second and 1 on the fourth day. 1 female died on the first day, 2 on the second and 1 each on days 5 and 6.
400 mg/kg (4%): 1 male died on day 2 and 1 on day 7. 1 female died within 24 h and one on day 6.
320 mg/kg (4%): 1 male each died on day 3 and 4.
320 mg/kg (2%): 1 male died on day 2.
250 mg/kg (4%): 1 male died on day 6.
250 mg/kg (2%): 1 male died on day 4.
Clinical signs:
1600 mg/kg: Immediatelyy post application high stepping gait, staggering, in intervals clonic convulsions.

800 mg/kg: high stepping gait, intermittent respiration.

400 mg/kg (8%): high stepping gait, intermittent respiration. 4 days after application: very calm attitude, gaunted sides, irregular respiration, agglutinated eyes, aquatting posture, bad general condition.

400 and 320 mg/kg (4%): immediately post application convulsions, intermittent respiration, animals are agressive. One day after application: intermittent respiration, fluffy fur, partly abdominal position. 2 days after application: calm attitude, fluffy fur, accelerated respiration.

320 and 250 mg/kg (2%): 10 min post application abdominal position, flattened ears, accelerated repiration, waddling gait. One day after application: ruffled and partly fluffy fur, accelerated respiration. 2 daysafter application: squatting posture
Gross pathology:
1600 mg/kg: peritoneal and gastrointestinal irritation. Liquid in abdomial cavity.
800 and 400 mg/kg (8%): Liquid in abdominal cavity, gastointestinal irritation, clouded adiposal tissue.
400 mg/kg (4%): Residual substance and agglutination.
250 mg/kg: clouded adiposal tissue.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Mortality:

 Dose (mg/kg)  Conc. (%)  1 h  24 h  48 h  7 days  14 days          
 1600  16  0/10  10/10  10/10  10/10  10/10          
 800  8  0/10  10/10  10/10  10/10  10/10          
 400  8 0/10  4/10  7/10  10/10  10/10          
 400  4  0/10  1/10  2/10  4/10  4/10          
 320  4  0/10  0/10  0/10  2/10  2/10          
 320  2  0/10  0/10  1/10  1/10  1/10          
 250  4  0/10  0/10  0/10  1/10  1/10          
 250  2  0/10  0/10  1/10  1/10  1/10          
 200  2  0/10  0/10  0/10  0/10  0/10          

Applicant's summary and conclusion