Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 213-635-5 | CAS number: 996-35-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
N,N-dimethylisopropylamine is corrosive to skin and eyes and irritating for the respiratory tract.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Centre Lago S. A., 01540 Vonnas, France
- Age at study initiation: ca. 6 months
- Weight range at study initiation: 3.43 kg – 3.52 kg
- Housing: single housing
- Diet: Kliba-Labordiaet (Kaninchen & Meerschweinchenhaltung “GLP”), Provimi Kliba SA, Kaiseraugst, Basel, Switzerland, ad libitum
- Water: Tap water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days before application
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-24°C
- Humidity (%): 30-70%
- Air changes (per hr): The animals were housed in fully air-conditioned rooms.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: Untreated skin sites of the same animal.
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): The test patch (2.5 cm x 2.5 cm) was moistened with a dose of 0.5 mL of the undiluted liquid test substance. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 3 min
- Observation period:
- 14 days
(A check for dead or moribund animals was made twice each workday and once daily at weekends.) - Number of animals:
- 2
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5x2.5 cm
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): The test substance was removed at the end of the exposure period with Lutrol and Lutrol/water (1:1).
- Time after start of exposure: 3 min
- Irritation parameter:
- other: corrosion
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- (2 animals)
- Remarks on result:
- other: Full thickness necrosis occurred after a 3 min exposure period.
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- (2 animals)
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 3.3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 14 days
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- (2 animals)
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 h and 72 h
- Score:
- 2.2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 14 days
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1A (corrosive) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- Under the experimental conditions, DMIPA was considered as corrosive when applied topically to rabbits
- Executive summary:
The acute dermal irritation of N,N-dimethylisopropylamine (DMIPA) was evaluated in rabbits according to OECD 404 guideline. DMIPA was applied undiluted to the skin of 2 New-Zealand White albino rabbits and held in contact for 3 minutes by means of a semi-occlusive dressing. Mean scores over 24, 48 and 72 hours for each animal were for erythema and for oedema. Animals were then observed daily during 14 days. Moderate to severe erythema (grade 2-4) and moderate to marked oedema (grade 2-3), partly extended beyond the area of exposure, were observed in all animals immediately after removal of the patch up to study termination on day 14. Additional findings like scaling, severe scaling, petechiae, eczematoid skin change and thickening of the skin at the application area were noted over the observation period. The skin of the application area appeared temporarily whitish-brownish, slightly brownish or dark brown. The cutaneous reactions were not reversible in the animals within 14 days after removal of the patch. The first animal still showed erythema, oedema, severe scaling, eczematoid skin change and thickening of the skin at study termination. The skin was soft and relocatable. In the second animal erythema, edema, eczematoid skin change and thickening of the skin were noted and the skin appeared dark brown.
Under the experimental conditions, DMIPA was considered as corrosive when applied topically to rabbits.
Reference
Mean erythema score after 24, 48 and 72 h; (animal1/animal2)
24 h | 48 h | 72 h | mean | ||
3 min | 3/3 | 3/4 | 3/4 | 3/3.7 |
Mean edema score after 24, 48 and 72 h; (animal1/animal2)
24 h | 48 h | 72 h | mean | ||
3 min | 2/3 | 2/2 | 2/2 | 2/2.3 |
Moderate to severe erythema (grade 2-4) and moderate to marked edema (grade 2-3), partly extended beyond the area of exposure, were observed in all animals immediately after removal of the patch up to study termination on day 14.
Additional findings like scaling, severe scaling, petechiae, eczematoid skin change and thickening of the skin at the application area were noted over the observation period. The skin of the application area appeared temporarily whitish-brownish, slightly brownish or dark brown. The cutaneous reactions were not reversible in the animals within 14 days after removal of the patch. The first animal still showed erythema, edema, severe scaling, eczematoid skin change and thickening of the skin at study termination. The skin was soft and relocatable. In the second animal erythema, edema, eczematoid skin change and thickening of the skin were noted and the skin appeared dark brown.
Pathological-anatonomical evaluation:
Animal 02 (right flank): lesion at the application area, incrusted surface.
Histopathological examination:
Animal 02 (right flank): full thickness necrosis of epidermis with severe, diffuse intraepidermal infiltration with lymphocytes, histiocytes, neutrophilic and eosionophilic granulocytes and serocellular crusts.
Major finding: Full thickness necrosis occurred after a 3 min exposure period.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (corrosive)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: JO RF 5 Avril 1971
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: no data
- Age at study initiation: no data
- Weight at study initiation: no data
- Housing:no data
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): no data
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):no data
- Acclimation period:no data
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): no data
- Humidity (%): no data
- Air changes (per hr):no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):no data
IN-LIFE DATES: From: To:no data - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not specified
- Amount / concentration applied:
- Amount applied: 0.1 ml
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- not rinsed
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 24h, 48h, 72h, 96h, 7days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72h
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks:
- after 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72h
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks:
- after 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: not scoreable
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks:
- after 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72h
- Score:
- 2.8
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks:
- after 7 days
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- severe iris opacification
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- Under these experimental conditions, DMIPA has to be classified as corrosive.
- Executive summary:
The acute eye irritation of Dimethylisopropylamine (DMIPA) was evaluated in rabbits according to the “Journal Officiel Français arrêté du 05 avril 1971”. 0,1mL of DMIPA was applied in the right eye of 6rabbits and the reaction was observed 24, 48, 72, 96hours and 7days after administration.
Iris has never been examined because of the total corneal opacity from 24hours. Maximal scores are recorded until the day7.
Under these experimental conditions, DMIPA has to be classified as corrosive.
Reference
Reading |
|
Rabbit |
Mean |
|||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|||
24hours |
Cornea |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
95.3/100 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|||
Iris |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
Conjunctive |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
||
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|||
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|||
|
||||||||
48hours |
Cornea |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
95.3/100 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|||
Iris |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
Conjunctive |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
||
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|||
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|||
|
||||||||
72hours |
Cornea |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
93.3/100 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|||
Iris |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
Conjunctive |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
||
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|||
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|||
|
||||||||
96hours |
Cornea |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
95.3/100 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|||
Iris |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
Conjunctive |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
||
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|||
2 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|||
|
||||||||
7days |
Cornea |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
98.3/100 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|||
Iris |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
Conjunctive |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
||
1 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|||
1 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Additional information
Skin Irritation-Corrosion
In vitro studies
To evaluate the potential skin corrosivity of N,N-dimethylisopropylamine, the pH and acidic/alkaline reserve was measured according to the method described by Regnier and Imbert (ATLA, 1992, 20, 457-465) and Froment (Arkema unpublished data, 1993) (Gancet, 2012). Under the test conditions, the results are as follow:
Test item |
pH |
log R (acidic/alkaline reserve |
Physical-chemical index (I) I = pH + log R, for pH =7 I = (14 -pH) + log R, for pH < 7 |
N,N-dimethylisopropylamine |
12.53 |
1.6 |
14.13 |
According to the method, a substance is considered as potentially corrosive to the skin if at least 2 of the 3 following criteria are fulfilled:
pH= 2.5 or pH =9.5; log R = 0 and/ot I= 10.
N,N-dimethylisopropylamine is considered as potentially corrosive to the skin.
The corrosive potential of N, N-Dimethylisopropylamine was evaluatedusing the EpiDerm corrosivity-test in vitro (BASF, 2006). This study was conducted in compliance the OECD guideline 431. The acceptance criteria were fulfilled and the study was therefore considered to be valid. The relative mean viabilities of the test item-treated tissues were: 3 minutes exposure: 30%, 1 hour exposure: 7%,. N, N-Dimethylisopropylamine, tested in its original form, is considered to be corrosive to the skin after a 3-min exposure.
In vivo studies
In a key study, the acute dermal irritation of N,N-dimethylisopropylamine (DMIPA) was evaluated in rabbits according to OECD 404 guideline (BASF, 2006). DMIPA was applied undiluted to the skin of 2 New-Zealand White albino rabbits and held in contact for 3 minutes by means of a semi-occlusive dressing. Mean scores over 24, 48 and 72 hours for each animal were for erythema and for oedema. Animals were then observed daily during 14 days. Moderate to severe erythema (grade 2-4) and moderate to marked oedema (grade 2-3), partly extended beyond the area of exposure, were observed in all animals immediately after removal of the patch up to study termination on day 14. Additional findings like scaling, severe scaling, petechiae, eczematoid skin change and thickening of the skin at the application area were noted over the observation period. The skin of the application area appeared temporarily whitish-brownish, slightly brownish or dark brown. The cutaneous reactions were not reversible in the animals within 14 days after removal of the patch. The first animal still showed erythema, oedema, severe scaling, eczematoid skin change and thickening of the skin at study termination. The skin was soft and relocatable. In the second animal erythema, edema, eczematoid skin change and thickening of the skin were noted and the skin appeared dark brown. Accordingly, N,N-dimethylisopropylamine is considered as corrosive for the skin.
In a rabbit acute dermal irritation study performed according to OECD guideline 404 (Guillot, 1986), N,N-dimethylisopropylamine induced a skin necrosis in 5 out of 6 rabbits after a 4-hour application. Accordingly, N,N-dimethylisopropylamine is considered as corrosive for the skin.
The acute dermal irritation of Dimethylisopropylamine (DMIPA) was evaluated in rabbits according to the “Journal Officiel de la République Française, arrêté du 05 avril 1971 ”.0,5mL of DMIPA was applied during 4 hours in 6 rabbits on intact or scarified skin. The cutaneous reaction was observed 24 or 72 hours after removal of the dressing (Truhaut, 1979). After application of the substance during 24 hours, the primary irritation score was 7.6 at 24 and 72 hours (maximum score=8). Under these experimental conditions, DMIPA is considered as corrosive.
Using a BASF AG internal procedure, two Vienna White rabbits were treated with the undiluted N,N-dimethylisopropylamine for 1, 5, 15 or 20 minutes under occlusive conditions; the application site was washed off with Lutrol/water following the contact periods (BASF, 1975). All exposure times caused irreversible necrosis; the substance was considered corrosive.
Eye irritation-Corrosion
In vitro studies
To evaluate the potential corrosivity for the eye of N,N-dimethylisopropylamine, the pH and acidic/alkaline reserve was measured according to the method described by Regnier and Imbert (ATLA, 1992, 20, 457-465) and Froment (Arkema unpublished data, 1993). Under the test conditions, the results are as follow:
Test item |
pH |
log R (acidic/alkaline reserve |
Physical-chemical index (I) I = pH + log R, for pH =7 I = (14 -pH) + log R, for pH < 7 |
N,N-dimethylisopropylamine |
12.53 |
1.6 |
14.13 |
According to the method, a substance is considered as potentially corrosive to the eye if at least 2 of the 3 following criteria are fulfilled:
pH= 2.5 or pH =9.5; log R = 0 and /or I= 9.
N,N-dimethylisopropylamine is considered as potentially severely irritanting to the eye.
In vivo studies
In a rabbit acute eye irritation study performed according a guideline equivalent to OECD 405 (Truhaut 1979), N,N-dimethylisopropylamine induced a complete corneal opacity and severe conjunctival reactions in the 6 rabbits. The reversibility of these effects was not assessed. Accordingly, N,N-dimethylisopropylamine was considered as severely irritating to eye.
An older study (BASF 1975) showed that 50 µl of the test substance instillated in the rabbit eye caused severe irritation, corneal opacity and focal tissue defects (necroses) to the conjunctivae. At the end of the observation period after 8 days beginning staphyloma, partially necrotic lid margins and suppuration was noted. N,N-dimethylisopropylamine
was therefore considered as corrosive to the eye.
Respiratory tract irritation
In a 4 -h acute inhalation toxicity study in rats performed with a structural analogue, dimethyl-n-propylamine, clinical and pathological signs of respiratory tract irritation were observed during exposure and in animals died during exposure (BASF, 2012).
N,N-dimethylisopropylamine is therefore considered as a respiratory tract irritant.
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
Key in vivo study
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
Key in vivo study
Effects on skin irritation/corrosion: corrosive
Effects on eye irritation: corrosive
Effects on respiratory irritation: irritating
Justification for classification or non-classification
Skin irritation: N,N-dimethylisopropylamine induced skin corrosion after a 3 -min exposure. On this basis and in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, DMIPA was classified as corrosive category 1A (Hazard statment H314: Causes severe skin burns
and eye damage) .
Eye irritation: DMIPA is classified as corrosive to the skin. On this basis and in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 DMIPA was classified as irritating to eyes caregory 1 ( H318: Causes serious eye damage).
Respiratory tract irritation: In acute inhalation exposure studies, dimethyl-n-propylamine, a structural analogue to DMIPA, induced respiratory tract irritation. On this basis and in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 DMIPA was classified as Specific Target Organ Toxicity (STOT) Single Exposure (SE) Category 3.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
