Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 218-487-5 | CAS number: 2162-74-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2009-02-19 - 2010-01-28
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP-Guideline Study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
- Report date:
- 2010
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide
- EC Number:
- 218-487-5
- EC Name:
- Bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide
- Cas Number:
- 2162-74-5
- Molecular formula:
- C25H34N2
- IUPAC Name:
- N,N'-bis[2,6-bis(propan-2-yl)phenyl]methanediimine
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material: bis(2.6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide
- Substance type: organic technical product
- Appearance: solid, crystalline waxy
- Lot/batch no.: 08100014
- Storage: room temperature
- Expiration date: 2009-05-11
-Other: Confirmation of the identity of the test item was performed. The test compound is not corrosive to the skin.
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- other: Crl:KBL(NZW)BR
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- For reasons of animal welfare a sequential testing strategy was followed in accordance with the current version of the EEC Directive No. 440/2008 and the OECD Guideline No. 405, irrespective of the requirements of other guidelines for testing for eye irritation/corrosion in rabbits.
This testing strategy comprised a stepwise approach including the evaluation of existing human and/or animal data showing effects on the eye or the skin, the performance of a SAR evaluation for eye and skin corrosion/irritation, measurement of pH value, the evaluation of data on systemic toxicity via the oral route, the performance of a validated in vitro test for skin corrosion (Human 3D Epidermal Skin Model) and in vivo testing for skin irritation/corrosion in rabbits before in vivo testing for eye irritation/corrosion in rabbits.
TEST ANIMALS: Healthy adult albino rabbits free of clinical signs. The health of the animals was routinely examined for the main specific pathogens by the breeder. Before the study the rabbits had been vaccinated against pasteurellosis and all animals were medicated against coccidiosis. No treatment with antibiotics was performed prior to receipt of the animals, or during the acclimatisation phase or study period. In some cases the animals had already been used in earlier studies. This has no influence to the results of this study. Females were nulliparous and not pregnant.
- Age at study initiation: young adult animals
- Weight at study initiation: 3.5 kg-3.6 kg
- Housing: individually in cage units metal/noryl by EBECO. Excrement trays below the cages contained low dust wood granulate bedding (J. Rettenmaier & Sons, Rosenberg, Germany). The wood granulate was changed at least twice weekly. The animals were regularly transferred to clean cages.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): standard diet "Ssniff K-Z" 4mm (manufacturer: Ssniff Spezialdiäten GmbH, Soest, Germany), approximately 100 g per animal per day (To satisfy the needs of roughage, hay was offered additionally (hay, irradiated, delivered by Harlan Nederland, 5961 NM Horst, Netherlands or Harlan Winkelmann GmbH, Borchen, Germany, respectively hay pellets, manufacturer: Ssniff Spezialdiäten GmbH, 59494 Soest, Germany). The nutritive composition and the contaminant content of the standard diet were checked and analysed routinely in random samples. No unwanted ingredients were detected.)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water ad libitum from polycarbonate bottles (The tap water was of drinking water quality (according to the Drinking Water Decree in the current version) and analysed routinely. The wood granulate was randomly checked for contaminants at regular intervals.)
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
- Other: The animals were identified by labels on the cages stating at least study number, test compound, animal number and by tattooed number assigned by the breeder.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 ±3°C
- Humidity (%): 50 ±25%
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): light/ dark cycle with a 12 hours rhythm.
- Other: The humidity and air temperature were continuously recorded. Occasionally deviations from the standards occurred, e.g. during cleaning of the animal room or effects of the weather. They did not have any apparent influence on the outcome of the study. The animal room was provided with sound from a radio program.
The animal room was cleaned at least once a week and disinfected at least once a month. It was ensured that the diet was not contaminated, and that there was no contact of the cleaning or disinfecting solution with the test animals.
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Remarks:
- 0.1 g of powder for each animal was placed into the conjunctival sac
- Controls:
- other: the untreated eye served as the control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- The solid test compound was heated in a drier to approximately 60°C (duration: approx. 2h). When the test substance was liquid, approx. 1 mL was taken and was given in a mortar. When the substance was crystallised again (duration approx. 1 min.), it was pulverised. From this powder 0.1 g was weighed for each animal.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 1 hour (eye was rinsed approximately 1 hour after instillation.)
- Observation period (in vivo):
- approximately at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours post application.
If no irritation indices were observed after 72 h, the study was finished.
If eye irritations were observed, animals were monitored usually on day 7, 14 and 21 after application until the changes had completely subsided, however for not more than 21 days after application. - Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- On the day before the test, both eyes of each animal were examined including fluorescein examination. Only animals with healthy intact eyes were used.
0.1 g of the pulverized test substance was placed into the conjunctival sac of one eye of the first animal after having gently pulled the lower lid away from the eyeball. The lids were gently held together for about one second in order to prevent loss of the test compound. The other eye, which remained untreated, served as control.
Because of the fact that one hour after treatment a severe irritation was not observed, a further two rabbits were treated as described.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): The eye was rinsed approximately 1 hour following instillation.
- Time after start of exposure: 1 hour
SCORING SYSTEM:
The degree of ocular lesions was recorded as specified by DRAIZE and any serious lesions or toxic effects other than ocular lesions were also recorded and fully described.
As general criteria the body weight of each animal was recorded at the beginning of the study. If clinical findings other than eye irritations occur they were recorded daily.
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: fluorescein
Results and discussion
In vivo
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 2 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 48 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 2 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 2 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 2 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 48 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 2 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 2 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 3 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 48 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 3 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 3 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 3 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 48 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 3 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 3 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 2 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 48 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 2 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 2 days
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Only redness of the conjunctivae was noted (up to 48 hours after instillation). No effects on iris or cornea were observed.
- Other effects:
- No other effects reported
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table1: Irritant Effects on the Eye | |||||||
Animal 1,Body Weight3.6kg | |||||||
Observation | 1h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | day7 | day14 | day21 |
Degree of cornea opacity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - |
Area of cornea opacity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - |
Iris | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - |
Redness conjunctivae | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | - | - | - |
Chemosis conjunctivae | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - |
Animal 2,Body Weight3.5kg | |||||||
Observation | 1h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | day7 | day14 | day21 |
Degree of cornea opacity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - |
Area of cornea opacity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - |
Iris | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - |
Redness conjunctivae | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | - | - | - |
Chemosis conjunctivae | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - |
Animal 3,Body Weight3.5kg | |||||||
Observation | 1h | 24 h | 48 h | 72h | day7 | day14 | day21 |
Degree of cornea opacity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - |
Area of cornea opacity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - |
Iris | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - |
Redness conjunctivae | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - |
Chemosis conjunctivae | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - |
- :no further examination | |||||||
Animal 1, 2 and 3, 1 h p.a.: test compound adhered to cornea and conjunctiva | |||||||
Table 2: Summary of Irritant Effects (Score) | ||||||
Mean | Reversible | |||||
Animal | 24h | 48h | 72h | scores | Response (days) | |
Corneal opacity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | na | |
1 | Iritis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | na |
Redness conjunctivae | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1.0 | 3 | |
Chemosis conjunctivae | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 | 2 | |
Corneal opacity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | na | |
2 | Iritis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | na |
Redness conjunctivae | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1.0 | 3 | |
Chemosis conjunctivae | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 | 2 | |
Corneal opacity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | na | |
Iritis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | na | |
3 | Redness conjunctivae | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 | 2 |
Chemosis conjunctivae | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | na | |
response: | ||||||
corneal opacity | : mean scores | < 2 | = -, | > 2 < 3 | = +, | > 3 = ++ |
iritis | : mean scores | < 1 | = -, | > 1 < 2 | = +, | =2=++ |
conjunctival redness | : mean scores | < 2,5 | = -, | > 2.5 | = +, | |
conjunctival oedema | : mean scores | < 2 | = -, | > 2 | = +, | |
na : not applicable |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: Eu-GHS
- Conclusions:
- The study was performed according to the OECD TG405 without deviations and according to the good laboratory practice principles, it is considered to be of the highest quality (reliability Klimisch 1). The criteria of validity of the test system are fulfilled. The test material did induce only slight reversible irritation on rabbit eyes. The test material was considered to be not irritating under the conditions of the test.
- Executive summary:
The test substance bis(2.6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide was investigated for its potential to cause irritation in the rabbit eye according to OECD TG405 (Gmelin, 2010). 0.1 g of pure substance were instilled into the conjunctival sac, the untreated eye served as control. Under the conditions of this experiment bis(2.6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide was found to cause no irritation when applied to the rabbit eye mucosa. No corrosion effect was observed at each of the measuring intervals. No discoloration of the cornea and conjunctivae which could be related to effects of the test material was observed. Additionally no corrosive or acute toxicological signs were observed in the animals during the test period. According to classification criteria in the European regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, amending regulation EC no. 1907/2006 (REACh) the test substance is not irritating to eyes and should be unclassified. There were no systemic intolerance reactions.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
