Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Well documented, according to accepted guidelines

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1989
Report date:
1989

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
yes
Remarks:
RCC, Research & Consulting Company AG
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Disodium 4,4'-bis[6-anilino-[4-[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]stilbene-2,2'-disulphonate
EC Number:
224-073-5
EC Name:
Disodium 4,4'-bis[6-anilino-[4-[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]stilbene-2,2'-disulphonate
Cas Number:
4193-55-9
IUPAC Name:
disodium 5-({4-anilino-6-[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl}amino)-2-{2-[4-({4-[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-6-(cyclohexa-1,3-dien-1-ylamino)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl}amino)-2-sulfonatophenyl]vinyl}benzenesulfonate
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): FAT 65'019/H
- Physical state: powder
- Analytical purity: 93.3%
- Lot/batch No.: ex PA. 76-79/86

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: BRL, Biological Research Laboratories Ltd.
- Age at study initiation: 7 to 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 359 to 454 g
- Housing: individually in Makrolon type-3 cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): pelleted standard Kliba 342 (ad libitum)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): community tap water (ad libitum)
- Acclimation period: one week


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3
- Humidity (%): 40 to 70
- Air changes (per hr): 10 to 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal and epicutaneous
Vehicle:
petrolatum
Concentration / amount:
Intradermal injection of test article diluted to 1%, dermal application of 15%, and dermal challenge with 10%
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
petrolatum
Concentration / amount:
Intradermal injection of test article diluted to 1%, dermal application of 15%, and dermal challenge with 10%
No. of animals per dose:
10 animals/sex in treatment group; 5 animals/sex in control group
Details on study design:
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 3
- Site: dorsal skin from the scapular region
- Frequency of applications: single
- Concentrations: diluted to 1%


B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: 24 hours
- Exposure period: 24 hours
- Test groups:
- Control group:
- Site: left and right flank
- Concentrations: 10% in petrolatum oil
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 and 48 hours


Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
formaldehyde solution

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Statistics:
Mean values with standard deviations. Fisher-Test (The Exact Fisher Test for comparison of the basic proability of two binominal distributions. L. Sachs, Statistische Auswertungsmethoden, Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart 1971). For calculation of p-values the 24 hours reading of the animals from the control and test groups was used.

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 10%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 10%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
4
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 10%. No with. + reactions: 4.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
3
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 10%. No with. + reactions: 3.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 10%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 10%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 10%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 10%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
From the results described above a mild allergenic potency of the test article diluted to 10% i n petrolatum oil was concluded after first challenge application. After second application no allergenic potency of the test article diluted to 10% in petrolatumoil was observed when the results were interpreted according to the rating of Magnusson and Kligman (1970).

According t o the EEC (European Economic Community) classification criteria described in wide lines 831467, September 16, 1983, this test article is considered to be a non-sensitizer.