Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 221-209-5 | CAS number: 3031-66-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Feb 2016 - May 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 017
- Report date:
- 2017
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.3700 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Hex-3-yne-2,5-diol
- EC Number:
- 221-209-5
- EC Name:
- Hex-3-yne-2,5-diol
- Cas Number:
- 3031-66-1
- Molecular formula:
- C6H10O2
- IUPAC Name:
- hex-3-yne-2,5-diol
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: B102 06.11.2015
- Purity: 98.8 corr. area%
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratories, Research Models and Services, Germany GmbH
- Age at study initiation: about 10-12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 143.0 - 190.9 g
- Housing: the rats were housed individually in Polycarbonate cages type III (floor area about 800 cm²)
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Kliba maintenance diet mouse/rat “GLP”, meal, supplied by Provimi Kliba SA, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): potable tap water in water bottles
- Acclimation period: The animals were acclimated to the laboratory conditions between start of the study and first administration (GD 6).
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-24°C
- Humidity (%): 30-70%
- Air changes (per hr): 15 times per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 /12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
The aqueous test substance solutions were prepared at the beginning of the administration period and thereafter at intervals, which took into account the period of established stability. The preparations were kept at room temperature.
For the test substance preparations, the specific amount of test substance was weighed, topped up with deionized water in a graduated flask and intensely mixed with a magnetic stirrer until it was completely dissolved.
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The stability of the test substance in deionized water at room temperature over a period of 7 days had been verified prior to the start of the study
- Details on mating procedure:
- The animals were paired by the breeder (“time-mated”); the day of evidence of mating (= detection of vaginal plug/sperm) was referred to as GD 0. The animals arrived on the same day (GD 0) at the experimental laboratory. The following day was designated as “GD 1”.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- From implantation to one day prior to the expected day of parturition (GD 6-19).
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once a day
- Duration of test:
- ON GD20 all surviving dams were sacrified and examined macroscopically.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 5 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 20 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 60 mg/kg bw/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 25
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
A cage-side examination was conducted at least once daily for any signs of morbidity, pertinent behavioral changes and signs of overt toxicity. During the administration period (GD 6-19) all animals were checked daily for any abnormal clinically signs before administration as well as within 2 hours and within 5 hours after administration.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
The animals were paired by the breeder (“time-mated”); the day of evidence of mating (= detection of vaginal plug/sperm) was referred to as GD 0. The animals arrived on the same day (GD 0) at the experimental laboratory. A check was made twice a day on working days or once a day on Saturdays, Sundays or on public holidays (GD 0-20).
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
All animals were weighed on GD 0, 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 13, 15, 17, 19 and 20. The body weight change of the animals was calculated based on the obtained results.
Furthermore, the corrected body weight gain was calculated after terminal sacrifice (terminal body weight on GD 20 minus weight of the unopened uterus minus body weight on GD 6).
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE : Yes
The consumption of food was recorded for the intervals GD 0-1, 1-3, 3-6, 6-8, 8-10, 10-13, 13- 15, 15-17, 17-19 and 19-20.
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes / No / No data
On GD 20, the dams were sacrificed under isoflurane anesthesia by decapitation, in randomized order.
After the dams had been sacrificed, they were necropsied and assessed for gross pathology - Ovaries and uterine content:
- Weight of the unopened uterus, Number of corpora lutea, Number and distribution of implantation sites classified as: Live fetuses
Dead implantations:
Early resorptions (only decidual or placental tissues visible or according to SALEWSKI from uteri from apparently non-pregnant animals and the empty uterus horn in the case of single horn pregnancy)
Late resorptions (embryonic or fetal tissue in addition to placental tissue visible)
Dead fetuses (hypoxemic fetuses which did not breathe spontaneously after the uterus had been opened)
After the weight of the uterus had been determined, all subsequent evaluations of the dams and the gestational parameters were conducted by technicians unaware of treatment group in order to minimize bias. For this purpose animal numbers were encoded. - Fetal examinations:
- At necropsy each fetus was weighed, sexed, and external tissues and all orifices were examined´ macroscopically. The sex was determined by observing the distance between the anus and the base of the genitalia. Furthermore, the viability of the fetuses and the condition of placentas, umbilical cords, fetal membranes, and fluids were examined. The placentas were weighed and their individual weights were recorded. Thereafter, the fetuses were sacrificed by a subcutaneous injection of pentobarbital (Narcoren®; dose: 0.1 mL/fetus). After these examinations, approximately one half of the fetuses per dam were eviscerated, skinned and fixed in ethanol; the other half was placed in Harrison’s fluid for fixation.
Soft tissue examination of the fetuses
The fetuses fixed in Harrison’s fluid were examined for any visceral findings according to the method of BARROW and TAYLOR. After this examination these fetuses were discarded.
Skeletal examination of the fetuses
The skeletons of the fetuses fixed in ethanol were stained according to a modified method of KIMMEL and TRAMMELL. Thereafter, the skeletons of these fetuses were examined under a stereomicroscope. After this examination the stained fetal skeletons were retained individually - Statistics:
- Means and standard deviations were calculated. In addition the following statistical analysis will be carried out:
Food consumption, body weight, body weight change, corrected body weight gain (net maternal body weight change), carcass weight, weight of unopened uterus,
number of corpora lutea, number ofimplantations, number of resorptions, number of live fetuses, proportions of preimplantation loss, proportions of postimplantation loss, proportions of resorptions, proportion of live fetuses in each litter, litter mean fetal body weight, litter mean placental weight. DUNNETT-Test
Female mortality, females pregnant at terminal sacrifice, number of litters with fetal findings. FISHERS EXACT-Test
Proportions of fetuses with malformations, variations and/or unclassified observations in each litter.WILCOXON-Test - Indices:
- Conception rate, preimplantation loss, postimplantation loss.
- Historical control data:
- Historical control data were available
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
General toxicity (maternal animals)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The mean body weights of the low-, mid- and high-dose dams (5, 20 or 60 mg/kg bw/d) were in general comparable to the concurrent
control group throughout the entire study period. Consistent to the reduced food consumption value from GD 6 to 8, the average body
weightgain of the dams in test group 3 (60 mg/kg bw/d) was statistically significantly decreased onGD 6-8. During GD 6-8 10 out of 25 animals showed a body weight loss (up to -15.3 g) which recovered during GD 8-10 and thereafter. If calculated for the entire treatment period (GD 6-19) or the entire study period (GD 0-20), the mean body weight gain of the high-dose damswas comparable to the
concurrent control group. The decreased body weight gain of the highdosedams during GD 6-8 was considered to be treatment-related and adverse.
The average body weight gain of the low- and mid-dose dams (5 or 20 mg/kg bw/d) was generally comparable to the concurrent control group throughout the entire study period.
The corrected body weight gain (terminal body weight on GD 20 minus weight of the unopened uterus minus body weight on GD 6) was distinctly and statistically significantly lower in test group 3 (60 mg/kg bw/d - about 24% below the concurrent control value).
Furthermore, the carcass weight of the high-dose dams was also reduced (without attaining statistical significance, about 3% below controls). The decrease in corrected body weight gain was considered to be treatment-related and adverse.
The corrected body weight gain of test groups 1 and 2 (5 and 20 mg/kg bw/d) revealed no difference of any biological relevance to
the corresponding control group. Moreover, mean carcass weights remained also unaffected by the treatment. - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The mean food consumption of the dams in test group 3 (60 mg/kg bw/d) was statistically significantly decreased on GD 6-8 (about 17% below control), but recovered afterwards and was comparable to the concurrent control group throughout the remaining study period (GD 8- 20). The decrease showed a high standard deviation value which might be caused by two individuals with very low food consumption values. However, if calculated for the entire treatment period (GD 6-19) or study period (GD 0-20), the mean food consumption of the high-dose dams was generally comparable to the concurrent control. Therefore, the reduced food consumption value during GD 6-8 was considered to be spontaneous and not treatment-related.
The mean food consumption of the dams in test groups 1 and 2 (5 and 20 mg/kg bw/d) was quite similar to the concurrent control throughout the entire study period. - Haematological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At gestation day 20 in dams of test group 3 (60 mg/kg bw/d) red blood cell (RBC) counts, hemoglobin, hematocrit and mean
corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) values were significantly decreased and absolute reticulocyte counts were increased.
Absolute reticulocyte counts were already statistically significantly higher in dams of test group 2 (20 mg/kg bw/d), but this was an isolated alteration of the red blood cell parameters and the mean was within the historical control range (absolute reticulocytes 77.4 – 187.0 giga/L). Therefore, increased absolute reticulocyte counts in dams of test group 2 were regarded as incidental and not
treatment-related. - Clinical biochemistry findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No treatment-related changes among clinical chemistry parameters were observed.
At gestation day 20, in dams of test group 3 (60 mg/kg bw/d) glucose and total bilirubin values were significantly increased and
creatinine values were significantly decreased. However, all means were within historical control ranges (glucose 4.76-5.81 mmol/L;
total bilirubin 0.67-1.66 μmol/L; creatinine 22.8-31.5 μmol/L). Therefore, all mentioned alterations were regarded as incidental and not
treatment-related. - Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Animals of all test groups (1-3) showed significantly increased relative liver weights, in animals of test groups 2 (20 mg/kg bw/d) and
3 (60 mg/kg bw/d) absolute liver weights were increased in addition. The increased absolute (+111%) and relative (+114%) liver weights of test group 3 animals and increased absolute (+8%) and relative (+9%) liver weights of test group 2 animals were assumed as
treatment related. A relation to treatment of the very slightly increase relative liver weights (+4%) in test group 1 animals is rather
unlikely, since only relative weight parameters were significantly changed and since the weight increase was very slight.
The increased absolute and relative weight of the spleen in test group 3 animals were assumed as treatment related. - Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The duodenal wall was thickened in 13/25 animals of test group 3 (60 mg/kg bw/d) and 2/25 animals of test group 2 (20 mg/kg bw/d).
The thickening of duodenal wall was assumed as treatment related.
All other findings occurred either individually or were biologically equally distributed over control and treatment groups. They were considered to be incidental or spontaneous in origin and without any relation to treatment.
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Number of abortions:
- no effects observed
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- no effects observed
- Total litter losses by resorption:
- no effects observed
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- For more details cf. "Attached background material"
Effect levels (maternal animals)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 5 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- gross pathology
- haematology
Results (fetuses)
- Fetal body weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Changes in sex ratio:
- no effects observed
- External malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Only one low-dose fetus with multiple external malformations was seen: female fetus No. 47- 10 (5 mg/kg bw/d) had an exophthalmus on its left eye, micrognathia and microstomia. These external findings were associated with multiple skeletal malformations concerning the skull.
The overall incidences of external malformations were comparable to those found in the historical control data and, therefore, assessed as incidental. - Skeletal malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Individual fetuses of test groups 1-3 (5, 20 or 60 mg/kg bw/d) had skeletal malformations. One low-dose fetus had associated external malformations. The finding ‘misshapentuberositas deltoidea’ was observed in one single fetus of test groups 2 and 3 each.
However, the finding can be found in the historical control data in a higher incidence and wasassessed as not treatment-related.
The number of these malformations adds up to a statisticallysignificantly higher value for the total skeletal malformation rate in the mid-dose group(mean of affected fetuses/litter: 2.3). However, the values are clearly inside the historical controlrange (HCD of affected fetuses/litter: 0.8%, andshowed no dose-dependency. Therefore, it was assessed as not treatment-related. - Other effects:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Three soft tissue variations were detected in all test groups including the control (0, 5, 20 or 60 mg/kg bw/d), i.e. short innominate, dilated renal pelvis and dilated ureter. The incidences of these variations were neither statistically significantly different from control nor dose-dependent and, therefore, not considered biologically relevant. All of them can be found in the historical control data at comparable incidences.
Fetal skeletal unclassified cartilage obvervations
Additionally, some isolated cartilage findings without impact on the respective bone structures, which were designated as unclassified cartilage observations, occurred in all test groups.. The observed unclassified cartilage findings were related to the skull, the ribs and
the sternum and, in most cases, did not show any relation to dosing. The incidence of ‘branched rib cartilage’ was statistically
significantly increased in test groups 1-3 (2.5%* / 3.7%** / 3.7%** affected fetuses per litter versus 0.0% in control) but was well within the historical control range (HCD of affected fetuses per litter: 2.1% [0.0 - 6.0]). Therefore, it was not assessed as treatment-related.
The overall incidences of skeletal unclassified cartilage observations in the substance- treated groups did not differ significantly from
the concurrent control group. - Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- External, soft tissue and skeletal malformations were noted in all test groups (0, 5, 20 and 60 mg/kg bw/d). Some fetuses were multiple malformed: one male control fetus had a situs inversus combined with an abnormal lung lobation. For one male fetus (5 mg/kg bw/d) severely malformed cervical vertebrae were recorded. The findings in one female fetus (5 mg/kg bw/d) consisted of multiple external malformations (exophthalmus, micrognathia, microstomia), comprising
severely malformed skull bones, while another male fetus (20 mg/kg bw/d) had a severely malformed vertebral column and/or ribs. No ontogenetic pattern is recognizable for the individual malformations nor was there any cluster of any of these individual malformations seen in the other offspring of the low-, mid- and high-dose groups. All of them are present in the historical control data of the rat strain. Thus, a relationship of these four cases of malformed fetuses to the treatment is not assumed. Three malformations, i.e. split scapula, malpositioned and bipartite sternebra and misshapen tuberositas deltoidea, were not related to dose and most of them can be found in the historical control data. An association of these findings to the treatment is also not assumed. The total number of the fetal skeletal malformations added up to a statistically significantly higher value in the mid-dose group (mean of affected fetuses/litter: 2.3) compared to control.
However, the values were clearly inside the historical control range (HCD of affected fetuses/litter: 0.8%, [0.0 - 3.0]; and showed no dose-dependency. Therefore,
it was assessed as not treatment-related and not adverse.
External variations did not occur in any of the fetuses of this study. Some soft tissue variations and a range of skeletal variations occurred in all test groups including the controls. None of the total incidences showed a relation to dosing. The majority of individual variations were equally distributed about the different
test groups, if normal biological variation is taken into account, and can be found in the historical control data at a comparable frequency.
One skeletal variation – wavy ribs - was dose-related increased without statistical significance and, in the high dose group, above the historical control range (mean of affected fetuses per litter: 11.0 %, HCD of affected fetuses per litter: 4.6% [0.8 - 8.7]). Wavy ribs were noted in 15 pups out of 11 litters (test group 3, 60 mg/kg bw/d). Wavy ribs represent a common finding in prenatal toxicity studies. Numerous studies have been conducted to study the reversibility of wavy ribs during postnatal development. They have shown that wavy ribs represent a reversible finding. The finding represents minor departures from normal morphology
or slight delays of ossification, which did not affect morphology. In the high-dose group they occur in the presence of maternal toxicity. Thus, the marginal increase of the finding above the background rate of the used rat strain is considered neither as adverse nor of toxicological relevance.
No unclassified external and no unclassified soft tissue observations were recorded for any of the fetuses in this study. A spontaneous origin is assumed for the unclassified skeletal cartilage observations which were observed in several fetuses of all test groups (0, 5, 20 and 60 mg/kg bw/d). The distribution and type of these findings do not suggest any relation to treatment.
The incidence of ‘branched rib cartilage’ was statistically significantly increased in test groups 1-3 (2.5%* / 3.7%** / 3.7%** affected fetuses per litter versus 0.0% in control) but was well within the historical control range (HCD: 2.1% [0.0 - 6.0]). Therefore, it was not assessed as a treatment-related, adverse event. The overall incidences of skeletal unclassified cartilage observations in the substance-treated groups did not differ significantly from the concurrent control group.
Finally, fetal examinations revealed that there is no effect of the compound on the respective morphological structures up to a dose of 60 mg/kg bw/d.
Effect levels (fetuses)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 60 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no adverse effects observed
Fetal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
For more details cf. "Attached background material"
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this prenatal developmental toxicity study, the oral administration of 3- Hexyne-2,5-diol to pregnant Wistar rats from implantation to one day prior to the expected day of parturition (GD 6-19) caused evidence of maternal toxicity in the mid- and high-dose group (20 and 60 mg/kg bw/d), such as decreased (corrected net) body weight gain, a normocytic, hypochromic, regenerative anemia based on altered hematology parameters (associated with increased spleen weights at 60 mg/kg bw/d), and thickening of duodenal wall in pathology. In conclusion, the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for maternal toxicity is 5 mg/kg bw/d.
Under the conditions of the present study the test substance is not teratogenic in rats. The no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for prenatal developmental toxicity is 60 mg/kg bw/d, the highest dose tested.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
