Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 700-571-2 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 25 April 2013 to 19 June 2013
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 013
- Report date:
- 2013
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian bone marrow chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Renewable hydrocarbons (diesel type fraction)
- EC Number:
- 700-571-2
- Cas Number:
- 928771-01-1
- Molecular formula:
- C10-20H22-42
- IUPAC Name:
- Renewable hydrocarbons (diesel type fraction)
- Test material form:
- other: liquid
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): NEXBTL renewable diesel
- Substance type: UVCB
Certificate of analysis presented in Appendix 5.
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- ICR
- Remarks:
- ICR (CD-1)
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd
- Age at study initiation: approximately 6-10 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 23-30g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: Yes
- Fasting period before study: No
- Housing: Group housed of up to 7/cage in solid floor polypropylene cages with wood flake bedding
- Diet: Harlan Teklad 2014C Global Certified Rodent Diet ad libitum
- Water: mains drinking water ad libitum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Acclimatisation period: at least 5 days
- Temperature: 19 to 25C
- Relative humidity: 30-70%
- Air exchanges: approximately 15 changes per hour
- Light/dark cycles: 12 hours light and 12 hours dark
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- Vehicle used: arachis oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
Animals dosed once via intraperitoneal route. One group of mice from each dose level were terminated 24 hours after treatment and a second group dosed with 2000 mg/kg were killed 48 hours after treatment. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 and 48 hours
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once
- Post exposure period:
- Treatment with 500, 1000 and 2000 mg /kg: 24 hours
Additional group treated with 2000 mg/kg: 48 hours
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Groups of 7 male mice per dose
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- 5 male mice, single oral administration of cyclophosphamide (50 mg/kg)
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow erythrocytes
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- Both femurs were dissected from each animal, aspirated with foetal bovine serum and bone marrow smears prepared following centrifugation and re-suspension.
Smears were air-dried, fixed in absolute methanol, stained in May-Grunwald/Giesma, allowed to air dry and a cover slip applied for examination microscopic evaluation. - Evaluation criteria:
- 2000 PCEs per animal were scored for the presence of micronuclei. The proportion of PCEs among 1000 total erythrocytes was determined for each animal and expressed as the PCE/NCE ratio.
A positive mutagenic repsonse would be demonstrated if a statistically significant dose-responsive, toxicologically relevant increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes was observed for either the 24 or 48 hour kill times when compared to vehicle control. - Statistics:
- Total polychromatic erythrocytes (PCEs), micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes, normochromatic, erythrocytes (NCEs) were compared to the control using Students t-test (two tailed)
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Clincial sign hunched posture observed in both groups dosed with 2000 mg/kg
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Any other information on results incl. tables
No statistically significant decreases in the PCE/NCE ratio were observed in any test groups and no evidence of any statistically significant increases in the incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in animals treated with NEXBTL renewable diesel when compared to control.
The vehicle and positive control groups exhibited a response consistent with the laboratory's historical control data. The negative control mean marginally exceeded the current historical vehicle control upper limit value. However, the numbers of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes observed in some of the individual animals were not outside of upper values quoted in the literature for vehicle control animals and therefore were considered acceptable for the purpose of this study. The positive control, cyclophosphamide induced a significant increase in the frequency of micronucleated PCEs (p<0.001)
The test item was found not to produce a toxicologically significant increase on the frequency of micronuclei in polychromatic erythrocytes of mice under the conditions of the test.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The test item was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of the test.
- Executive summary:
The study was performed to assess the potential of the test item to produce damage to chromosomes or aneuploidy when adminstered to mice following OECD Guideline 474 (1997).
A range finding test was performed to find suitable dose levels of the test item, route of administration and to investigate if there was a marked difference in toxic response between sexes. There was no marked difference in toxicity of the test item between sexes therefore the main test was performed using male mice only. The micronucleus test was conducted using intraperitoneal route in groups of 7 male mice at the maximum recommended dose of 2000 mg/kg with 1000 and 500 as the two lower dose levels. Animals were killed 24 or 48 hours later, the bone marrow extracted and smear preparations made and stained. Polychromatic (PCE) and normochromatic (NCE) erythrocytes were score for the presence of micronuclei.
Vehicle control group of mice were given a single oral dose of arachis oil and a positive control group of mice dosed orally with cyclophosphamide and killed after 24 hours.
There were no premature deaths at any dose level. The clincial sign hunched posture was observed in animals dosed with the test item at 2000 mg/kg in both 24 and 48 hour dose groups. No statistically significant decreases in PCE/NCE ratio were observed in any of the test item dose groups.
There was no evidence of any statistically significant increases in the incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in animals dosed with the test item when compared to the vehicle control group.
The positive control group showed a marked increase in the incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes confirming the sensitivity of the system to known mutagenic activity of cyclophosphamide under the conditions of the test.
In conclusion, the test item was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of the test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
