Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Toxicity to reproduction

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
Between 12 July 2010 and 17 February 2011.
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The study was conducted in accordance with international guidelines and in accordance with GLP. All relevant validity criteria were met.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2011
Report date:
2011

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Fatty acids, C18-unsatd., reaction products with acrylic acid and polyethylenepolyamines
EC Number:
287-820-4
EC Name:
Fatty acids, C18-unsatd., reaction products with acrylic acid and polyethylenepolyamines
Cas Number:
85586-18-1
Molecular formula:
Not applicable (a generic molecular formula cannot be provided for this specific UVCB substance)
IUPAC Name:
(Z,9Z)-N-(2-{2-[(8Z)-heptadec-8-en-1-yl]-4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-1-yl}ethyl)octadec-9-enimidic acid; 3-[(2-carboxyethyl)({2-[3-(2-carboxyethyl)-2-[(8Z)-heptadec-8-en-1-yl]imidazolidin-1-yl]ethyl})amino]propanoic acid; 3-{2-[(8Z)-heptadec-8-en-1-yl]-3-{2-[(E)-[(9Z)-1-hydroxyoctadec-9-en-1-ylidene]amino]ethyl}imidazolidin-1-yl}propanoic acid
Test material form:
liquid
Details on test material:
Sponsor's identification : PR-4758 - Technical Grade
Description : Amber coloured liquid
Purity : 55% in Ethylene Glycol Solvent
Batch number : FA0A0049
Label : PR-4758 FA0A0049
Date received : 28 April 2010
Storage conditions :Room temperature in the dark
Expiry date : 30 January 2012

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
other: Wistar Han™:HsdRccHan™:WIST strain rats
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS

- Source:
Wistar Han™:HsdRccHan™:WIST strain rats were obtained from a reputable supplier for full details please see full study report.

- Age at study initiation:
Approximately 12 weeks old

- Weight at study initiation:
312 to 378 g (male); 193 to 244 g (female)

- Fasting period before study:
Not applicable

- Housing:
Initially, all animals were housed in groups of five in solid floor polypropylene cages with stainless steel mesh lids and softwood flake bedding (Datesand Ltd., Cheshire, UK). During the mating phase, animals were transferred to polypropylene grid floor cages suspended over trays lined with absorbent paper on a one male: one female basis within each dose group. Following evidence of successful mating, the males were returned to their original cages. Mated females were housed individually during gestation and lactation, in solid floor polypropylene cages with stainless steel mesh lids and softwood flakes.

- Diet:
The animals were allowed free access to food. A pelleted diet (Rodent 2018C Teklad Global Certified Diet, Harlan Laboratories U.K. Ltd., Oxon, UK) was used throughout the study period. The diet was considered not to contain any contaminant at a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study.

- Water:
Water intake was measured daily throughout the study (with the exception of the mating phase). Mains drinking water was supplied from polycarbonate bottles attached to the cage. The drinking water was considered not to contain any contaminant at a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study.

- Acclimation period:
Seven days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS

- Temperature:
(°C): 21 ± 2

- Humidity (%):
55 ± 15

- Air changes (per hr):
At least fifteen air changes per hour

- Photoperiod (hr dark / hrs light):
12 hours continuous light and 12 hours darkness

IN-LIFE DATES:
First day of treatment: 14 July 2010 - Final necropsy day was 29 August 2010.

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Type of inhalation exposure (if applicable):
other: Not applicable
Vehicle:
other: Distilled water
Details on exposure:
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:

For the purpose of this study the test material was prepared at the appropriate concentrations as a solution in distilled water. The stability and homogeneity of the test material formulations were previously determined by Harlan Laboratories Ltd., Shardlow, UK Analytical Services (Harlan Laboratories Ltd. Project Number: 3180-0007). Results from the previous study showed the formulations to be stable for at least fourteen days. Formulations were therefore prepared weekly during the treatment period and stored at approximately +4ºC in the dark. Samples of each test material formulation were taken and analysed for concentration of test material at Harlan Laboratories Ltd., Shardlow, UK Analytical Services. The method used for analysis of formulations and the results obtained are given in Appendix (to be advised).

The results indicate that the prepared formulations were acceptable for the purpose of this study.

DIET PREPARATION
Not applicable

- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency):
Not applicable

- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food):
Not applicable

- Storage temperature of food:
No data

VEHICLE
Distilled water.

- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water):
Not applicable

- Concentration in vehicle:
0, 20, 60 and 200 mg/ml

- Amount of vehicle (if gavage):
5 ml/kg

- Lot/batch no. (if required):
Not applicable

- Purity:
Not applicable
Details on mating procedure:
- M/F ratio per cage:
1/1 (Animals were paired on a 1 male: 1 female basis within each dose group)

- Length of cohabitation:
Up to 14 days

- Proof of pregnancy:
Cage tray-liners were checked each morning for the presence of ejected copulation plugs and each female was examined for the presence of a copulation plug in the vagina. A vaginal smear was prepared for each female and the stage of the oestrous cycle or the presence of sperm was recorded. The presence of sperm within the vaginal smear and/or vaginal plug in situ was taken as positive evidence of mating (Day 0 of gestation)

- After ... days of unsuccessful pairing replacement of first male by another male with proven fertility.:
Not applicable

- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts:
Not applicable

- After successful mating each pregnant female was individually caged:
Mated females were housed individually during the period of gestation and lactation.

- Any other deviations from standard protocol:
Not applicable
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
yes
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
The homogeneity, stability and linearity determinations were performed under Harlan Laboratories Ltd project number 3180-0007.

The analytical method has been satisfactorily validated in terms of linearity, specificity and accuracy for the purposes of the study.

The concentration of the test material in the formulations was determined spectrophotometrically.

The test item formulations were diluted with methanol to give a final, theoretical test item concentration of approximately 0.05 mg/m

Standard solutions of test item were prepared in methanol at a nominal concentration of 0.05 mg/ml.

The test item formulations were sampled and analysed within one day of preparation

The results indicate that the prepared formulations were acceptable for the purpose of this study.

See attached Appendix 26 - Chemical Analysis of Test Material Formulations, Methods and Results
Duration of treatment / exposure:
All males from all treatment groups were terminated on Day 43, followed by the termination of all females and offspring on Day 5 post partum. All animals were subjected to a gross necropsy examination and histopathological evaluation of selected tissues was performed.
Frequency of treatment:
Daily
Details on study schedule:
Ten male and ten female animals were treated daily at the appropriate dose level throughout the study. The first day of dosing was designated as Day 1 of the study.

Prior to the start of treatment and once weekly thereafter, all animals were observed for signs of functional / behavioural toxicity.

On Day 15, animals were paired on a 1 male: 1 female basis within each dose group for a maximum of four days.

Following evidence of mating (designated as Day 0 post coitum) the males were returned to their original cages and females were transferred to individual cages.

On completion of mating (during Week 6), five selected males per dose group were evaluated for functional/sensory responses to various stimuli was performed.

Pregnant females were allowed to give birth and maintain their offspring until Day 5 post partum. Evaluation of each litter size, litter weight, mean offspring weight by sex, clinical observations and landmark developmental signs were also performed during this period.

At Day 4 post partum, five selected females per dose group were evaluated for functional/sensory responses to various stimuli.

Blood samples were taken from five males from each dose group for haematological and blood chemical assessments on Day 42. Following completion of the female gestation and lactation phases, the male dose groups were killed and examined macroscopically.

Additional blood samples were taken from five randomly selected females from each dose group at termination for haematological and blood chemical assessment on Day 4 post partum. At Day 5 post partum, all surviving females and surviving offspring were killed and examined macroscopically.

Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
100 mg/kg/day (20 mg/mk)
Basis:
actual ingested
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
300 mg/kg/day (60 mg/ml)
Basis:
actual ingested
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
1000 mg/kg/day (200 mg/ml)
Basis:
actual ingested
No. of animals per sex per dose:
0 mg/kg/day - Control 10 animals per sex per.
100 mg/kg/day - 10 animals per sex.
300 mg/kg/day - 10 animals per sex.
1000 mg/kg/day - 10 animals per sex
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Details on study design:
- Dose selection rationale:
Based on results from a Fourteen day Repeated Dose Oral (Gavage) Range-Finding Toxicity Study in the Rat (Harlan Laboratories Ltd. Project Number 3180-0007).

- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random):
Random

- Rationale for selecting satellite groups:
Not applicable

- Post-exposure recovery period in satellite groups:
Not applicable

- Section schedule rationale (if not random):
Random
Positive control:
Not applicable

Examinations

Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS:
- Yes see attached Table 1 and Appendix 1

- Time schedule:
- Immediately before dosing, up to thirty minutes after dosing, and one and five hours after dosing, during the working week. Animals were observed immediately before dosing, thirty minutes after dosing, and one hour after dosing at weekends and public holidays (except for females during parturition where applicable). All observations were recorded.

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes (see above).
- Yes see attached Table 1 and Appendix 1

BODY WEIGHT:
- Yes see attached Tables 4 and 5 and Appendices 7 and 8

- Time schedule for examinations:
Individual bodyweights were recorded on Day 1 (prior to dosing) and then weekly for
males until termination and weekly for females until mating was evident.

Bodyweights were then recorded for females on Days 0, 7, 14 and 20 post coitum, and on Days 1 and 4 post partum.

FOOD CONSUMPTION:
- Yes see attached Table 9 and Appendix 9

- During the maturation period, weekly food consumption was recorded for each cage of adults. This was continued for males after the mating phase. For females showing
evidence of mating, food consumption was recorded for the periods covering Days 0-7, 7-14 and 14-20. For females with live litters, food consumption was recorded on Days 1 and 4 post partum.

FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Yes see attached Table 10 and Appendix 9

- Food efficiency:
(the ratio of bodyweight change/dietary intake) was calculated retrospectively for males throughout the study period (with the exception of the mating phase) and for females during the pre-mating phase. Due to offspring growth and milk production, food efficiency could not be accurately calculated during gestation and lactation.

WATER CONSUMPTION:
- Yes see attached Table 11 and Appendix 10

- Time schedule for examinations:
Water intake was measured daily from Day 1 (excluding mating).

OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: Not applicable

HAEMATOLOGY AND CLINICAL CHEMISTRY:
- Yes see attached Tables 18 and 19 and Appendices 17 to 20

- Time schedule for collection of blood:

Haematological and blood chemical investigations were performed on five males and five females selected from each test and control group prior to termination (Day 42 for males and Day 4 post partum for females).

- Blood samples were obtained from the lateral tail vein or by cardiac puncture at termination, if applicable.

- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: No

- Animals fasted: No

- How many animals:
Five males and 5 females selected from each surviving treatment group on Day 42 and from five randomly selected females from each dose group at termination for haematological and blood chemical assessment on Day 4 post partum.

URINALYSIS: Not applicable

NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION:
- Yes see attached Tables 3 to 6 and Appendices 2 to 6

- Time schedule for examinations:
(Behavioural assessment)
Prior to the start of treatment at weekly intervals thereafter

(Functional Performance Tests)
Final week of treatment.

(Sensory Reactivity)
Final week of treatment.

- Dose groups that were examined:
(Behavioural assessment)
All animals

(Functional Performance Tests)
Five selected males and females per dose level

(Sensory Reactivity)
Five selected males and females per dose level

- Parameters examined:

(Behavioural assessment)
Detailed individual clinical observations were performed for each animal using a purpose-built arena.

The following parameters were observed:
Gait, hyper/hypothermia, tremors, skin colour, twitches, respiration, convulsions, palpebral closure, bizarre/abnormal/stereotypic behaviour, urination, salivation, defecation, pilo-erection, transfer arousal, exophthalmia, tail elevation and lachrymation

(Functional Performance Tests)
Motor Activity.
Purpose-built 44 infra-red beam automated activity monitors were used to assess motor activity. Animals were randomly allocated to the activity monitors. The tests were performed at approximately the same time each day, under similar laboratory conditions. The evaluation period was thirty minutes for each animal. The percentage of time each animal was active and mobile was recorded for the overall thirty minute period and also during the final 20% of the period (considered to be the asymptotic period).

Forelimb/Hindlimb Grip Strength.
An automated meter was used. Each animal was allowed to grip the proximal metal bar of the meter with its forepaws. The animal was pulled by the base of the tail until its grip was broken. The animal was drawn along the trough of the meter by the tail until its hind paws gripped the distal metal bar. The animal was pulled by the base of the tail until its grip was broken. A record of the force required to break the grip for each animal was made. Three consecutive trials were performed for each animal.

(Sensory Reactivity)
Animals were assessed for sensory reactivity to auditory, visual and proprioceptive stimuli. The following parameters were observed: Grasp response, touch escape, vocalisation, pupil reflex, toe pinch, startle reflex, tail pinch, blink reflex and finger approach

OTHER:
MATING
Animals were paired on a 1 male: 1 female basis within each dose group, for a period of up to fourteen days. Cage tray-liners were checked each morning for the presence of ejected copulation plugs and each female was examined for the presence of a copulation plug in the vagina. A vaginal smear was prepared for each female and the stage of the oestrous cycle or the presence of sperm was recorded. The presence of sperm within the vaginal smear and/or vaginal plug in situ was taken as positive evidence of mating (Day 0 of gestation) and the males were subsequently returned to their original holding cages (unless required for additional pairing). Mated females were housed individually during the period of gestation and lactation.

PREGNANCY AND PARTURITION
Each pregnant female was observed at approximately 0830, 1230 and 1630 hours and around the period of expected parturition. Observations were carried out at approximately 0830 and 1230 hours at weekends and public holidays. The following was recorded for each female:

i) Date of pairing
ii) Date of mating
iii) Date and time of observed start of parturition
iv) Date and time of observed completion of parturition

LITTER SIZE
On completion of parturition (Day 0 of post partum), the number of live and dead offspring was recorded. Offspring were individually identified within each litter by tattoo on Day 1 post partum.
For each litter the following was recorded:

i) Number of offspring born
ii) Number of offspring alive recorded daily and reported on Days 1 and 4 post partum
iii) Sex of offspring on Days 1 and 4 post partum
iv) Clinical condition of offspring from birth to Day 5 post partum
v) Individual offspring weights on Days 1 and 4 post partum (litter weights were calculated retrospectively from this data)

PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT
All live offspring were assessed for surface righting reflex on Day 1 post partum


Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
A vaginal smear was prepared for each female and the stage of the oestrous cycle was recorded.
Sperm parameters (parental animals):
Parameters examined in all male parental generations:testis During histopathology, the male epididymides were examined for spermatocoel granuloma formation.
Litter observations:
STANDARDISATION OF LITTERS
- Performed on day 4 postpartum:
No

PARAMETERS EXAMINED
The following parameters were examined in offspring:
Number of offspring born, number and sex of offspring alive recorded daily and reported on Day 1 and 4 post partum, clinical condition of offspring from birth to Day 5 post partum, individual offspring and litter weights on Day 1 and 4 post partum, physical Development and pathology.

GROSS EXAMINATION OF DEAD PUPS:
Dying offspring during the study were subjected to a full external and internal examination, and any macroscopic abnormalities were recorded.
Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
SACRIFICE

- Male animals:
Adult surviving males were killed by intravenous overdose of a suitable barbiturate agent followed by exsanguination on Day 43.

- Maternal animals:
Adult surviving females were killed by intravenous overdose of a suitable barbiturate agent followed by exsanguination on Day 5 post partum. Any females that failed to achieve pregnancy or produce a litter were killed on or after Day 26 post coitum.

GROSS NECROPSY / ORGAN WEIGHTS
Yes see attached Table 21 (Offspring) and Table 22 (Adult) and Appendices 23 (Offspring) and 24 (Adult) and for organ weights - see attached Table 20 and Appendix 21

For all females the uterus was examined for signs of implantation and the number of uterine implantations in each born was recorded. This procedure was enhanced; as necessary, by staining the uteri with a 1% ammonium polysulphide solution. In addition, the corpora lutea of all ovaries from pregnant females were counted at necropsy. All adult animals, including any that died during the study, were subjected to a full external and internal examination, and any macroscopic abnormalities were recorded.

HISTOPATHOLOGY
Yes see attached Appendix 25

The following organs, removed from the five selected males and parental females from each group that were killed at the end of the study, were dissected free from fat and weighed before fixation. Adrenals, ovaries, brain, spleen, epididymides, testes, heart, thymus, kidneys, thyroid and liver.

The following reproductive organs were weighed from all animals that were killed at the end of the study: ovaries, epididymides and testes.

Samples of the following tissues were preserved from five males and five females from each dose group, in buffered 10% formalin except where indicated.

Adrenals, aorta (thoracic), bone & bone marrow (femur including stifle joint), bone & bone marrow (sternum), brain (including cerebrum, cerebellum and pons), caecum, coagulating gland, colon, duodenum, epididymides (preserved in Bouin’s fluid then transferred to 70% Industrial Methylated Spirits (IMS) up to 48 hours later), eyes (fixed in Davidson’s fluid), gross lesions, heart, ileum, jejunum, kidneys, liver, lungs (with bronchi)(lungs were inflated to approximately normal inspiratory volume with buffered 10% formalin before immersion in fixative), lymph nodes (cervical and mesenteric), mammary gland, muscle (skeletal), ovaries, pancreas, pituitary, prostate, oesophagus, rectum, salivary glands (submaxillary), sciatic nerve, seminal vesicles, skin (hind limb), spinal cord (cervical), mid thoracic and lumbar, spleen, stomach, thyroid, trachea, testes (preserved in Bouin’s fluid then transferred to 70% Industrial Methylated Spirits (IMS) up to 48 hours later), thymus, urinary bladder, uterus/cervix and vagina.

The following tissues were also removed from the remaining animals:coagulating gland, epididymides, ovaries, pituitary, prostate, seminal vesicles, testes and uterus/cervix.

All tissues were dispatched to Harlan Laboratories Ltd, Switzerland (Principal Investigator: K Weber). The tissues from five selected control and 1000 mg/kg/day dose group animals, any animals dying during the study, and any animals which failed to mate or did not achieve a pregnancy were prepared as paraffin blocks, sectioned at a nominal thickness of 5 μm and stained with haematoxylin and eosin for subsequent microscopic examination. In addition, sections of testes and epididymides from all control and 1000 mg/kg/day males were also stained with Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS) stain and examined.

Since there were indications of treatment-related changes in the liver & kidney, examination was subsequently extended to include similarly prepared sections of these tissues from five animals per sex from the low and intermediate groups.


Postmortem examinations (offspring):
Surviving offspring were terminated via intracardiac overdose of sodium pentobarbitone. Necropsy findings checked in Table 21 were included. All offspring, including those dying during the study, were subjected to a full external and internal examination, and any macroscopic abnormalities
were recorded.
Statistics:
Repeat Dose Toxicity Data

Quantitative male data, female data prior to pairing, functional performance test data, blood chemical and haematology data will be analysed by the ProvantisTM Tables and Statistics Module. For each variable, the most suitable transformation of the data will be found, the use of possible covariates checked and the homogeneity of means assessed using ANOVA on ANCOVA and Bartlett’s test. The transformed data will be analysed to find the lowest treatment level that shows a significant effect, using the Williams Test for parametric data or the Shirley Test for non-parametric data. If no dose response is found, but the data shows non-homogeneity of means, the data will be analysed by a stepwise Dunnett (parametric) or Steel (non-parametric) test to determine significant difference from the control group. Finally, if required, pair-wise tests are performed using the Student t-test (parametric) or the Mann-Whitney U test (non-parametric).

Female gestation and lactation data and offspring data will be assessed, where appropriate, by one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) incorporating a test for homogeneity of variance will be used. Dose response relationships may be investigated by linear regression. Where variances are shown to be homogeneous, pair-wise comparisons will be conducted using Dunnetts test. Where appropriate, data will be analysed using non-parametic methods: Kruskal-Wallis, ANOVA and Mann-Witney U test.

Reproductive Indices

Where appropriate, the data will be statistically analysed using Levene’s test for homogeneity of variance followed by one way analysis of variance and pair-wise comparison using a choice of versions of multiple comparison tests; or Kruskal-Wallis non parametric one way analysis of variance and Mann Whitney U test/Wilcoxon signed rank test.
Reproductive and viability indices by Fisher's exact test or chi-squared probability test may be used, where applicable (see appended Appendix 1).
Reproductive indices:
Reproductive Indices - Mating Performance and Fertility

The following parameters were calculated from the individual data during the mating period of the parental generation:

i) Pre-coital Interval
Calculated as the time elapsing between initial pairing and the observation of positive evidence of mating.

ii) Fertility Indices
For each group the following were calculated:

Mating Index (%) = x 100

Pregnancy Index (%) = x 100

Gestation and Parturition Data

The following parameters were calculated for individual data during the gestation and parturition period of the parental generation.

i) Gestation Length
Calculated as the number of days of gestation including the day for observation of mating and the start of parturition.

ii) Parturition Index
The following was calculated for each group:

Parturition Index (%) = x 100
Litter Responses

The standard unit of assessment was considered to be the litter, therefore values were first calculated for each litter and the group mean was calculated using their individual litter values. Group mean values included all litters reared to termination (Day 5 of age).

i) Implantation Losses (%)

Group mean percentile pre-implantation and post-implantation loss was calculated for each female/litter as follows:

Pre–implantation loss = x100

Post–implantation loss = x 100
ii) Live Birth and Viability Indices

The following indices were calculated for each litter as follows:

Live Birth Index (%) = x 100

Viability Index (%) = x 100

iii) Sex Ratio (% males)

Sex ratio was calculated for each litter value on Days 1 and 4 post partum, using the following formula: x 100

Offspring viability indices:
The standard unit of assessment was considered to be the litter, therefore values were first calculated for each litter and the group mean was calculated using their individual litter values. Group mean values included all litters reared to termination (Day 5 of age).

i) Implantation Losses (%)

Group mean percentile pre-implantation and post-implantation loss were calculated for
each female/litter as follows:

% pre – implantation loss = [(Number of corpora lutea - Number of Corpora Lutea) ÷ Number of implantation sites] x 100

% post – implantation loss =[(Number of implantation sites - Number of implantation sites) ÷ Total number of offspring born] x 100

ii) Live Birth and Viability Indices

The following indices were calculated for each litter as follows:

Live Birth Index (%) = (Number of offspring born ÷Number of offspring alive on Day 1) x 100

Viability Index 1 (%) = (Number of offspring alive on Day 1 ÷ Number of offspring alive on Day 4) x 100

iii) Sex Ratio (% males)

Sex ratio was calculated for each litter value on Day 1 and 4 post partum, using the following formula:
(Number of male offspring ÷ Total number of offspring) x 100

Results and discussion

Results: P0 (first parental generation)

General toxicity (P0)

Clinical signs:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Episodes of increased salivation were evident in animals of either sex treated with 1000 mg/kg/day from Day 9 (males) and Day 14 (females), together with an isolated incident of decreased respiration evident in one male treated with 1000 mg/kg/day on Day 29.

No such effects were detected in animals of either sex treated with 300 or 100 mg/kg/day.

Generalised fur loss was evident in one female treated with 1000 mg/kg/day between Days 34 and 45. Observations of this nature are commonly observed in group housed animals or during the lactation phase for parental females and are considered not to be related to treatment.
Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
not examined
Mortality:
no mortality observed
Description (incidence):
There were no unscheduled deaths that were related to test item toxicity.
One control male was found dead on Day 40. Macroscopic examination of this animal revealed a perforation in the oesophagus which may have been
due to a misplaced gavage.
Body weight and weight changes:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
See attached Tables 7 and 81 and individual data in Appendices 7 and 8. Also Figure 1 and Figure 2 which depict cumulative bodyweight changes graphically.

Males treated with 1000 mg/kg/day showed a statistically significant reduction (P<0.05) in body weight gain during Week 3 and Week 4 of treatment.

No adverse effects on body weight change were detected for females treated at all dose levels during the pre-mating, gestation or lactation phases of the study when compared to controls.

Males from all treatment groups showed a statistically significant increase (P<0.01) in body weight gain during Week 5 of treatment. Males treated with 100 mg/kg/day also showed a statistically significant increase (P<0.05) in body weight gain during Week 2. An increase in body weight gain is not considered to represent an adverse effect of treatment and the intergroup differences detected during Week 5 were considered to be related to the actual body weight loss of one control male that was later found dead during the final week of treatment.
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
See attached Tables 9 and 10, individual cage values during maturation and individual values for females during gestation and lactation in Appendix 9. Food intake is also presented graphically in Figure 3 and Figure 4

No adverse effect on food consumption was detected for males during the treatment period or for females during the pre-mating, gestation or lactation phases of the study.
Food efficiency:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Food efficiency (the ratio of body weight gain to dietary intake) was not affected for males throughout the treatment period or for females during the pre-mating phase.
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not examined
Ophthalmological findings:
no effects observed
Haematological findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
See attached Table 18 and 17 and individual data in Appendix 17 and Appendix 18.

There were no toxicologically significant effects detected in the haematological parameters measured.
Males treated with 1000 mg/kg/day showed a statistically significant reduction (P<0.05) in mean cell haemoglobin concentration. Although all individual values were outside the normal range for rats of the strain and age used, control values were also outside the normal range and in the absence of any associated changes the intergroup difference was considered not to be of toxicological significance.
Females treated with 1000 and 300 mg/kg/day showed a statistically significant reduction (P<0.05) in monocytes. All the individual values were within the normal ranges for rats of the strain and age used and the intergroup difference was considered not to be of toxicological significance.
Clinical biochemistry findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
There were no toxicologically significant effects detected in the blood chemical parameters measured.
Females treated with 1000 mg/kg/day showed a statistically significant reduction in bilirubin. All the individual values were within the normal ranges for rats of the strain and age used and the intergroup difference was considered not to be of toxicological significance.
Urinalysis findings:
no effects observed
Behaviour (functional findings):
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
There were no toxicologically significant changes in functional performance.

Females treated with 1000 and 300 mg/kg/day showed a statistically significant reduction in mean forelimb grip strength. The intergroup differences were confined to one out of the three tests and in the absence of a true dose related response or any supporting clinical observations to suggest an effect of neurotoxicity, the finding was considered to be of no toxicological significance.
Immunological findings:
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
effects observed, treatment-related
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
See attached histopathology report in Appendix 25.

The following treatment-related microscopic effects were detected:

Kidneys: Interstitial fibrosis and inflammatory cells, areas of degeneration/necrosis, tubular dilatation and degeneration/necrosis of tubular epithelium, increased severity of tubular basophilia and hyaline droplets, granular and hyaline casts, corticomedullary mineralization, glomerular hyalinization and thickening of the glomerular basement membrane were evident in males treated with 1000 mg/kg/day.
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
no effects observed
Other effects:
no effects observed

Reproductive function / performance (P0)

Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
no effects observed
Reproductive function: sperm measures:
no effects observed
Reproductive performance:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Mating
A summary incidence of adult performance is given in Table 1. Group values for mating performance are presented in Table 12. Individual data are given in Appendix 11.

No treatment-related effects were detected in mating performance. All paired animals mated within the first four days of pairing.
Statistical analysis of the pre-coital interval data did not reveal any significant intergroup differences.

Fertility
A summary incidence of adult performance is given in Table 1. Group values for fertility, litter data and implantation losses are given in Tables 12, 13 and 14. Individual data are given in Appendices 11 to 13.

No treatment-related effects were detected on fertility for treated animals when compared to controls.

One female treated with 1000 mg/kg/day did not achieve pregnancy following evidence of mating. In the absence of any histopathological correlates in the reproductive organs to elucidate the cause of the non-pregnancy in either the paired female or male partner which did not produce a pregnancy, the intergroup difference was considered to be incidental and of no toxicological importance.

Gestation Length
Group values for gestation length are given in Table 12. Individual lengths are given in Appendix 11.

No treatment-related effects were detected in the length of gestation for treated females when compared to controls. All animals showed gestation lengths between 22 to 24 days.
Statistical analysis of the data did not reveal any significant intergroup differences.

Litter Responses

In total, all females from the control and 100 mg/kg/day dose groups, eight females from the 300 mg/kg/day dose group and nine females from the 1000 mg/kg/day dose group gave birth to a live litter and successfully reared young to Day 5 of age. The following assessment of litter response is based on all litters reared to termination on Day 5 of lactation/age.

Offspring Litter Size and Viability
Group mean corpora lutea and implantation counts, litter size, implantation losses and survival indices and sex ratio are given in Tables 13 to 15. Individual data are given in Appendices 12 to 14.

No significant differences were detected for corpora lutea for treated animals when compared to controls. Litter sizes and viability for treated groups were also comparable to controls. There were no intergroup differences in sex ratio (percentage male offspring) for litters from treated groups compared to controls. Statistical analysis of the data did not reveal any significant intergroup differences.

Females treated with 300 mg/kg/day showed a statistically significant reduction in implantation sites (P<0.05). In the absence of a dose related effect or a subsequent effect on litter size at birth the intergroup difference was considered to be of no toxicological significance.

Details on results (P0)

ADULT RESPONSES

MORTALITY
There were no unscheduled deaths that were related to test item toxicity.

One control male was found dead on Day 40. Macroscopic examination of this animal revealed a perforation in the oesophagus which may have been
due to a misplaced gavage.

CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS
See attached Table2 and individual data in Appendix 1.

Episodes of increased salivation were evident in animals of either sex treated with 1000 mg/kg/day from Day 9 (males) and Day 14 (females), together with an isolated incident of decreased respiration evident in one male treated with 1000 mg/kg/day on Day 29.

No such effects were detected in animals of either sex treated with 300 or 100 mg/kg/day.

Generalised fur loss was evident in one female treated with 1000 mg/kg/day between Days 34 and 45. Observations of this nature are commonly observed in group housed animals or during the lactation phase for parental females and are considered not to be related to treatment.

FUNCTIONAL OBSERVATIONS
See attached Tables 3 to 6 and individual data in Appendices 23 to 26.

Behavioural Assessments

Weekly open field arena observations did not reveal any treatment-related effects for treated animals when compared to controls.

Functional Performance Tests

There were no toxicologically significant changes in functional performance.

Females treated with 1000 and 300 mg/kg/day showed a statistically significant reduction in mean forelimb grip strength. The intergroup differences were confined to one out of the three tests and in the absence of a true dose related response or any supporting clinical observations to suggest an effect of neurotoxicity, the finding was considered to be of no toxicological significance.

Sensory Reactivity Assessments

There were no treatment-related changes in sensory reactivity.

All inter and intra group differences in sensory reactivity scores were considered to be a result of normal variation for rats of the strain and age used and the differences were of no toxicological importance.

BODYWEIGHT
See attached Tables 7 and 81 and individual data in Appendices 7 and 8. Also Figure 1 and Figure 2 which depict cumulative bodyweight changes graphically.

Males treated with 1000 mg/kg/day showed a statistically significant reduction (P<0.05) in body weight gain during Week 3 and Week 4 of treatment.

No adverse effects on body weight change were detected for females treated at all dose levels during the pre-mating, gestation or lactation phases of the study when compared to controls.

Males from all treatment groups showed a statistically significant increase (P<0.01) in body weight gain during Week 5 of treatment. Males treated with 100 mg/kg/day also showed a statistically significant increase (P<0.05) in body weight gain during Week 2. An increase in body weight gain is not considered to represent an adverse effect of treatment and the intergroup differences detected during Week 5 were considered to be related to the actual body weight loss of one control male that was later found dead during the final week of treatment.

FOOD CONSUMPTION
See attached Tables 9 and 10, individual cage values during maturation and individual values for females during gestation and lactation in Appendix 9. Food intake is also presented graphically in Figure 3 and Figure 4

No adverse effect on food consumption was detected for males during the treatment period or for females during the pre-mating, gestation or lactation phases of the study. Food efficiency (the ratio of body weight gain to dietary intake) was not affected for males throughout the treatment period or for females during the pre-mating phase.

WATER CONSUMPTION
See attached Table 11 and individual and group mean water consumptions for females in Appendix 10.

Males treated with 1000 and 300 mg/kg/day showed an increase in water consumption throughout the treatment period. Females treated with 1000 mg/kg/day also showed an increase in water consumption during maturation, gestation and lactation.
Statistical significance was achieved during the first week of gestation.
No such effect was detected in females treated with 300 mg/kg/day or animals of either sex treated with 100 mg/kg/day.

HAEMATOLOGY
See attached Table 18 and 17 and individual data in Appendix 17 and Appendix 18.

There were no toxicologically significant effects detected in the haematological parameters measured.
Males treated with 1000 mg/kg/day showed a statistically significant reduction (P<0.05) in mean cell haemoglobin concentration. Although all individual values were outside the normal range for rats of the strain and age used, control values were also outside the normal range and in the absence of any associated changes the intergroup difference was considered not to be of toxicological significance.
Females treated with 1000 and 300 mg/kg/day showed a statistically significant reduction (P<0.05) in monocytes. All the individual values were within the normal ranges for rats of the strain and age used and the intergroup difference was considered not to be of toxicological significance.

BLOOD CHEMISTRY
See attached Table 19 and individual data in Appendix 19 and Appendix 20.

There were no toxicologically significant effects detected in the blood chemical parameters measured.
Females treated with 1000 mg/kg/day showed a statistically significant reduction in bilirubin. All the individual values were within the normal ranges for rats of the strain and age used and the intergroup difference was considered not to be of toxicological significance.

REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE

Mating
A summary incidence of adult performance is given in Table 1. Group values for mating performance are presented in Table 12. Individual data are given in Appendix 11.

No treatment-related effects were detected in mating performance. All paired animals mated within the first four days of pairing.
Statistical analysis of the pre-coital interval data did not reveal any significant intergroup differences.

Fertility
A summary incidence of adult performance is given in Table 1. Group values for fertility, litter data and implantation losses are given in Tables 12, 13 and 14. Individual data are given in Appendices 11 to 13.

No treatment-related effects were detected on fertility for treated animals when compared to controls.

One female treated with 1000 mg/kg/day did not achieve pregnancy following evidence of mating. In the absence of any histopathological correlates in the reproductive organs to elucidate the cause of the non-pregnancy in either the paired female or male partner which did not produce a pregnancy, the intergroup difference was considered to be incidental and of no toxicological importance.

Gestation Length
Group values for gestation length are given in Table 12. Individual lengths are given in Appendix 11.

No treatment-related effects were detected in the length of gestation for treated females when compared to controls. All animals showed gestation lengths between 22 to 24 days.
Statistical analysis of the data did not reveal any significant intergroup differences.

Litter Responses

In total, all females from the control and 100 mg/kg/day dose groups, eight females from the 300 mg/kg/day dose group and nine females from the 1000 mg/kg/day dose group gave birth to a live litter and successfully reared young to Day 5 of age. The following assessment of litter response is based on all litters reared to termination on Day 5 of lactation/age.

Offspring Litter Size and Viability
Group mean corpora lutea and implantation counts, litter size, implantation losses and survival indices and sex ratio are given in Tables 13 to 15. Individual data are given in Appendices 12 to 14.

No significant differences were detected for corpora lutea for treated animals when compared to controls. Litter sizes and viability for treated groups were also comparable to controls. There were no intergroup differences in sex ratio (percentage male offspring) for litters from treated groups compared to controls. Statistical analysis of the data did not reveal any significant intergroup differences.

Females treated with 300 mg/kg/day showed a statistically significant reduction in implantation sites (P<0.05). In the absence of a dose related effect or a subsequent effect on litter size at birth the intergroup difference was considered to be of no toxicological significance.

NECROPSY (ADULTS)
See attached Tables 21 to 22 and individual data in Appendices 23 and 24.

There were no toxicologically significant macroscopic abnormalities detected.

One male treated with 1000 mg/kg/day had an enlarged left testis and epididymis and a small right testis and epididymis at necropsy. This male also had a mass on the left epididymis. One female treated with 1000 mg/kg/day showed a reddened thymus and a further female from this treatment group had reddened lungs at necropsy. One female treated with 300 mg/kg/day had a small spleen and pale adrenals and one female treated with 100 mg/kg/day also had pale adrenals at necropsy. In the absence of any true dose related responses or any histology correlates the intergroup differences were considered not to be of toxicological importance. One control male had a reddened thymus and dark cervical lymph nodes at necropsy. In the absence of treatment, these were considered to be low incidence findings occasionally observed in laboratory maintained rats. One male treated with 300 mg/kg/day and one female treated with 100 mg/kg/day incurred damage to the eyes during the removal procedure. The control male that was found dead on Day 40 had dark coloured contents in the gastro-intestinal tract, a dark liver and spleen, reddened lungs and thymus, a distended stomach and a hole in the oesophagus.

ORGAN WEIGHTS
See attached Table 20 and individual data in Appendices 21 and 22.

Males treated with 1000 mg/kg/day showed a statistically significant increase in kidney weight both absolute and relative to terminal body weight (P<0.01).

No toxicologically significant effects were detected in females treated with 1000 mg/kg/day or animals of either sex treated with 300 and 100 mg/kg/day.

Females treated with 1000 mg/kg/day showed a reduction in thyroid/parathyroid and pituitary weight both absolute and relative to terminal body weight. The effect on pituitary weight also extended to females treated with 300 mg/kg/day. In the absence of any histology correlates the intergroup differences were considered to be of no toxicological importance. Males from all treatment groups showed a reduction in heart weight both absolute and relative to terminal bodyweight. In the absence of a true dose related response or any histology correlates the intergroup differences were considered to be of no toxicological importance.

HISTOPATHOLOGY
See attached histopathology report in Appendix 25.

The following treatment-related microscopic effects were detected:

Kidneys: Interstitial fibrosis and inflammatory cells, areas of degeneration/necrosis, tubular dilatation and degeneration/necrosis of tubular epithelium, increased severity of tubular basophilia and hyaline droplets, granular and hyaline casts, corticomedullary mineralization, glomerular hyalinization and thickening of the glomerular basement membrane were evident in males treated with 1000 mg/kg/day.

Liver: Centrilobular hepatocyte hypertrophy was seen in all males treated with 1000 mg/kg/day.

Effect levels (P0)

open allclose all
Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
>= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
female
Remarks on result:
not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
300 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male
Basis for effect level:
body weight and weight gain
organ weights and organ / body weight ratios
histopathology: non-neoplastic

Target system / organ toxicity (P0)

Key result
Critical effects observed:
no

Results: F1 generation

General toxicity (F1)

Clinical signs:
effects observed, treatment-related
Mortality / viability:
mortality observed, treatment-related
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Sexual maturation:
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
not examined
Gross pathological findings:
effects observed, treatment-related
Histopathological findings:
not examined

Details on results (F1)

Offspring Growth and Development

Group values for offspring body weight and body weight change, surface righting reflex and the incidence of clinical signs are given in Tables 13, 16 and 17. Individual values and observations are given in Appendices 12, 15 and 16.

There were no differences in litter weights or mean offspring body weights between control and treated animals.

Statistical analysis of the data did not reveal any significant intergroup differences.

No obvious clinical signs of toxicity were detected for offspring from treated females when compared to controls. The incidental clinical signs detected throughout the control and treated groups, consisting of small size, offspring found dead or missing, bruising, no milk in stomach, cold, weak, dehydrated and physical injuries were considered to be low incidence findings observed in offspring in studies of this type, and were unrelated to test item toxicity.

No treatment-related effects were detected for surface righting reflex for offspring from treated animals when compared to offspring from control females.

Statistical analysis of the data did not reveal any significant intergroup differences.

GROSS PATHOLOGY (OFFSPRING)

Neither the incidence, type or distribution of macroscopic findings observed at necropsy of decedent offspring nor offspring killed at scheduled termination (Day 5 of age) indicated any adverse effect of maternal treatment.

Effect levels (F1)

Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOEL
Generation:
F1
Effect level:
>= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Remarks on result:
not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects

Target system / organ toxicity (F1)

Key result
Critical effects observed:
no

Overall reproductive toxicity

Key result
Reproductive effects observed:
no

Any other information on results incl. tables

(3180 -0008) - See attached Tabulated Summary of Reproduction and Development, Keys to Tables, Figures, Appendices and Addenda.

Study Findings for the Fourteen day Repeated Dose Oral (Gavage) Range-Finding Toxicity Study in the Rat (Harlan Laboratories Ltd. Project Number 3180-0007).

 

Results.

 

Mortality

There were no unscheduled deaths during the study.

Clinical Observations

No clinically observable signs of toxicity were detected.

Incidents of increased salivation and noisy respiration were evident in one female treated with 1000 mg/kg/day between Days 2 and 13.

No such effects were evident in males treated with 1000 mg/kg/day or in animals of either sex treated with 500 or 250 mg/kg/day.

Body Weight

Overall body weight gains were slightly reduced in animals of either sex treated with 1000 mg/kg/day when compared to controls.

No such effects were evident in animals of either sex treated with 500 or 250 mg/kg/day.

Food Consumption

No adverse effect on dietary intake or food efficiency was detected in treated animals when compared to controls throughout the treatment period.

Water Consumption

An increase in overall water consumption was detected in males treated with 1000 mg/kg/day.

No such effects were evident in females treated with 1000 mg/kg/day or in animals of either sex treated with 500 or 250 mg/kg/day.

Necropsy

No toxicologically significant macroscopic abnormalities were detected.

One female treated with 1000 mg/kg/day had hydronephrosis in the right kidney at necropsy. This is considered to be a congenital abnormality and of no toxicological importance.

DISCUSSION

The oral administration of PR-4758 - Technical Grade, to rats for a period of fourteen consecutive days at dose levels of 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day resulted in treatment related effects in animals of either sex from all treatment groups.

Incidents of increased salivation and noisy respiration were evident in one female treated with 1000 mg/kg/day between Days 2 and 13. An increase in overall water consumption was also detected in males treated with 1000 mg/kg/day. Observations of this nature are commonly observed following oral administration of an unpalatable or slightly irritant test material formulation and in isolation are not considered to be of toxicological significance.

Overall body weight gains were slightly reduced in animals of either sex treated with 1000 mg/kg/day when compared to controls. In the absence of any associated clinical signs of toxicity or any adverse effect on food consumption the slight reduction in body weight gain was considered not to represent a true toxicological effect.

CONCLUSION

The oral administration of PR-4758 - Technical Grade to rats for a period of fourteen consecutive days at dose levels of 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day produced no toxicologically significant effects in the parameters measured. The “No Observed Adverse Effect Level” (NOAEL) and a suitable high dose level for use on future toxicity studies was, therefore, considered to be 1000 mg/kg/day.

 

 

 

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The oral administration of PR-4758 - Technical Grade to rats by gavage, at dose levels of 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day, resulted in treatment-related effects in males treated with 1000 mg/kg/day. No toxicologically significant effects were detected in females treated with 1000 mg/kg/day or animals of either sex treated with 300 or 100 mg/kg/day, hence the 'No Observed Adverse Effect Level' (NOAEL) for systemic toxicity was considered to be 1000 mg/kg/day for females and 300 mg/kg/day for males.

No treatment-related effects were observed for reproduction, therefore, a ‘No Observed Effect Level’ (NOEL) for reproductive toxicity was considered to be 1000 mg/kg/day.
Executive summary:

Introduction.

The study was designed to investigate the systemic toxicity and potential adverse effects of the test item on reproduction (including offspring development) and meets the requirements of the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals No. 422 “Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test” (adopted 22 March 1996).

 

This study was also designed to meet the requirements of Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 laying down test methods pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH).

 

Methods.

The test item was administered by gavage to three groups, each of ten male and ten female Wistar Han™:HsdHan™:WIST strain rats, for up to eight weeks (including a two week maturation phase, pairing, gestation and early lactation for females), at dose levels of 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day. A control group of ten males and ten females was dosed with vehicle alone (Distilled water).

 

Clinical signs, behavioural assessments, body weight change and food and water consumption were monitored during the study. 

 

Pairing of animals within each dose group was undertaken on a one male: one female basis within each treatment group on Day 15 of the study, with females subsequently being allowed to litter and rear their offspring to Day 5 of lactation.

 

During the lactation phase, daily clinical observations were performed on all surviving offspring, together with litter size and offspring weights and assessment of surface righting reflex.

 

Extensive functional observations were performed on five selected males from each dose group after the completion of the mating phase, and for five selected parental females from each dose group on Day 4post partum. Haematology and blood chemistry were evaluated prior to termination on five selected males and females from each dose group. 

 

Surviving males were terminated on Day 43, followed by the termination of all females and surviving offspring on Day 5post partum. All animals were subjected to a gross necropsy examination and histopathological evaluation of selected tissues was performed.

 

Results

 

Adult Responses:

 

Mortality.

There were no unscheduled deaths that were considered to be related to test item toxicity.

 

Clinical Signs.

Episodes of increased salivation were evident in animals of either sex treated with 1000 mg/kg/day together with an isolated incident of decreased respiration evident in one male from this treatment group. No such effects were detected in animals of either sex treated with 300 or 100 mg/kg/day.

 

Behavioural Assessment.

There were no treatment-related changes in the behavioural parameters measured.

 

Functional Performance Tests.

There were no toxicologically significant changes in functional performance.

 

Sensory Reactivity Assessments.

There were no treatment-related changes in sensory reactivity. 

 

Bodyweights.

Males treated with 1000 mg/kg/day showed a statistically significant reduction in body weight gain during Week 3 and Week 4 of treatment.

 

No such effects were detected in females treated with 1000 mg/kg/day or animals of either sex treated with 300 or 100 mg/kg/day.

 

Food Consumption and Food Efficiency.

No adverse effects on food consumption or food efficiency were detected for treated animals when compared with controls.

 

Water Consumptions.

Males treated with 1000 and 300 mg/kg/day showed an increase in water consumption throughout the treatment period. Females treated with 1000 mg/kg/day also showed an increase in water consumption during maturation, gestation and lactation. No such effect was detected in females treated with 300 mg/kg/day or animals of either sex treated with 100 mg/kg/day.

 

Haematology.

There were no toxicologically significant effects detected in the haematological parameters measured.

 

Blood Chemistry.

There were no toxicologically significant effects detected in the blood chemical parameters measured.

 

Reproductive Performance:

Mating.

There were no treatment-related effects on mating in animals of either sex treated with 1000, 300 or 100 mg/kg/day.

 

Fertility.

There were no treatment-related effects on conception rates for animals of either sex treated with 1000, 300 or 100 mg/kg/day.

 

Gestation Length.

There were no differences in gestation lengths. The distribution for treated females was comparable to controls.

 

Litter Responses.

 

Offspring Litter Size and Viability.

Of the litters born, litter size at birth and subsequently on Day 1 and Day 4post partumwere comparable to controls.

 

Offspring Growth and Development.

Offspring body weight gain and litter weights at birth and subsequently on Day 1 and Day 4post partumwere comparable to controls. No adverse effects were detected in surface righting reflex on Day 1.

 

Pathology.

 

Necropsy.

There were no toxicologically significant macroscopic abnormalities detected.

 

Organ Weights.

Males treated with 1000 mg/kg/day showed an increase in kidney weight both absolute and relative to terminal body weight. No toxicologically significant effects were detected in females treated with 1000 mg/kg/day or animals of either sex treated with 300 and 100 mg/kg/day.

 

Histopathology.

The following treatment related microscopic effects were detected:

 

Kidneys:Interstitial fibrosis and inflammatory cells, areas of degeneration/necrosis, tubular dilatation and degeneration/necrosis of tubular epithelium, increased severity of tubular basophilia and hyaline droplets, granular and hyaline casts, corticomedullary mineralization, glomerular hyalinization and thickening of the glomerular basement membrane were evident in males treated with 1000 mg/kg/day.

 

Liver:Centrilobular hepatocyte hypertrophy was seen in all males treated with 1000 mg/kg/day.

 

Conclusion.

The oral administration of PR-4758 - Technical Grade to rats by gavage, at dose levels of 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day, resulted in treatment-related effects in males treated with 1000 mg/kg/day. No toxicologically significant effects were detected in females treated with 1000 mg/kg/day or animals of either sex treated with 300 or 100 mg/kg/day, hence the 'No Observed Adverse Effect Level' (NOAEL) for systemic toxicity was considered to be 1000 mg/kg/day for females and 300 mg/kg/day for males.

 

No treatment-related effects were observed for reproduction, therefore, a ‘No Observed Effect Level’ (NOEL) for reproductive toxicity was considered to be 1000 mg/kg/day.