Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Partition coefficient

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
1. SOFTWARE
EpiSuite v4.11, US EPA, 2012

2. MODEL (incl. version number)
KOWWIN v1.68

3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
CC(O)(C#CC(C)(O)CC(C)C)CC(C)C
CC(CC(C)C)(C#CC(C)(O)CC(C)C)OCCO
OCCOCCOC(C)(CC(C)C)C#CC(C)(O)CC(C)C
CC(CC(C)C)(C#CC(C)(CC(C)C)OCCO)OCCO
CC(C)CC(C)(O)C#CC(C)(CC(C)C)OCCOCCOCCO
OCCOCCOC(C)(CC(C)C)C#CC(C)(CC(C)C)OCCO
CC(C)CC(C)(O)C#CC(C)(CC(C)C)OCCOCCOCCOCCO
CC(C)CC(C)(OCCO)C#CC(C)(CC(C)C)OCCOCCOCCO
OCCOCCOC(C)(CC(C)C)C#CC(C)(CC(C)C)OCCOCCO

4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
- Defined endpoint: n-octanol-water partition coefficient
- Unambiguous algorithm: KOWWIN uses a "fragment constant" methodology to predict log P, known as an Atom/Fragment Contribution (AFC) method. Coefficients for individual fragments and groups were derived by multiple regression of 2447 reliably measured log P values.
Results of the two successive multiple regressions (first for atom/fragments and second for
correction factors) yield the following general equation for estimating log P of any organic compound:
log P = Σ(fini ) + Σ(cjnj ) + 0.229
(num = 2447, r2 = 0.982, std dev = 0.217, mean error = 0.159)

where Σ(fini ) is the summation of fi (the coefficient for each atom/fragment) times ni (the number of
times the atom/fragment occurs in the structure) and b is the linear equation constant; Σ(cjnj ) is the summation of cj (the coefficient for each correction factor) times nj (the number
of times the correction factor occurs (or is applied) in the molecule).

- Defined domain of applicability:
Currently there is no universally accepted definition of model domain. However, users may wish to
consider the possibility that log P estimates are less accurate for compounds outside the MW
range of the training set compounds, and/or that have more instances of a given fragment than the
maximum for all training set compounds. It is also possible that a compound may have a functional
group(s) or other structural features not represented in the training set, and for which no fragment
coefficient was developed. These points should be taken into consideration when interpreting
model results.

Training Set Molecular Weights:
Minimum MW: 18.02
Maximum MW: 719.92
Average MW: 199.98

Validation Molecular Weights:
Minimum MW: 27.03
Maximum MW: 991.15
Average MW: 258.98

- Appropriate measures of goodness-of-fit and robustness and predictivity:
The model has been tested on an external validation dataset of 10,946 compounds.
Total Validation Set Statistics:
number in dataset = 10946
correlation coef (r2) = 0.943
standard deviation = 0.479
absolute deviation = 0.356
avg Molecular Weight = 258.98

Validation Set Estimation Error:
within <= 0.20 - 39.6%
within <= 0.40 - 66.0%
within <= 0.50 - 75.6%
within <= 0.60 - 82.5%
within <= 0.80 - 91.6%
within <= 1.00 - 95.6%
within <= 1.20 - 97.7%
within <= 1.50 - 99.1%

5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
- Descriptor domain: The components of the substance are within the molecular weight range of the training set compounds, and all fragments are represented in the training set. Thus, it is concluded, that the substance is within the applicability domain.
- Similarity with analogues in the training set: several linear and branched alkanes and alkenes, which are considered to be similar, are present in the training set.

6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
The QSAR prediction is valid and of good reliability. Thus, the result is adequate for chemical safety assessment.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Estimation of the log Kow of the components by QSAR (EpiSuite v4.11, US EPA, 2012; KOWWIN v1.68)
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
not applicable vor in silico study
Type of method:
calculation method (fragments)
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
>= 2.51 - <= 3.61
Temp.:
25 °C
pH:
>= 0 - <= 14

 

SMILES

Log Kow

2,4,7,9-Tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol, monomer

CC(O)(C#CC(C)(O)CC(C)C)CC(C)C

 

3.6090

2,4,7,9-Tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol, ethoxylated(1/0)

CC(CC(C)C)(C#CC(C)(O)CC(C)C)OCCO

 

3.3346

2,4,7,9-Tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol, ethoxylated (2/0)

OCCOCCOC(C)(CC(C)C)C#CC(C)(O)CC(C)C

 

3.0602

2,4,7,9-Tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol, ethoxylated (1/1)

CC(CC(C)C)(C#CC(C)(CC(C)C)OCCO)OCCO

 

3.0602

2,4,7,9-Tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol, ethoxylated (3/0)

CC(C)CC(C)(O)C#CC(C)(CC(C)C)OCCOCCOCCO

 

2.7858

2,4,7,9-Tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol, ethoxylated (2/1)

OCCOCCOC(C)(CC(C)C)C#CC(C)(CC(C)C)OCCO

 

2.7858

2,4,7,9-Tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol, ethoxylated (4/0)

CC(C)CC(C)(O)C#CC(C)(CC(C)C)OCCOCCOCCOCCO

 

2.5114

2,4,7,9-Tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol, ethoxylated (3/1)

CC(C)CC(C)(OCCO)C#CC(C)(CC(C)C)OCCOCCOCCO

 

2.5114

2,4,7,9-Tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol, ethoxylated (2/2)

OCCOCCOC(C)(CC(C)C)C#CC(C)(CC(C)C)OCCOCCO

 

2.5114

Conclusions:
The estimated log Kow of 2,4,7,9-Tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol, ethoxylated (1.3) ranges from 2.51 to 3.61 (EpiSuite v4.11, US EPA, 2012, KOWWIN v1.68).
Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Justification for type of information:
REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH

1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
This read-across is based on the hypothesis that source and target substances have similar toxicological properties because
- they are manufactured from similar precursors under similar conditions
- they share structural similarities with common functional groups: the substances start with an acetylene group as core structure; geminal hydroxyl groups on the alpha carbon atoms; distal to the geminal hydroxyl groups is an isobutyl group (methyl isopropyl); the target substance 2,4,7,9-Tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol, ethoxylated (1.3) is further functionalised with ethylene oxide and has an ethoxylation degree of 1.3; the source substance 2,4,7,9-Tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol, ethoxylated (3.8) has an ethoxylation degree of 3.8
- they have similar physicochemical properties and thus, show a similar toxicokinetic behaviour
- they are expected to undergo similar metabolism: oxidation of the terminal methyl groups to result in alcohol, aldehyde and finally the corresponding acid

Therefore, read-across from the existing toxicity, ecotoxicity, environmental fate and physicochemical studies on the source substances is considered as an appropriate adaptation to the standard information requirements of REACH regulation.

2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
see “Justification for read-across” attached to IUCLID section 13

3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
see “Justification for read-across” attached to IUCLID section 13

4. DATA MATRIX
see “Justification for read-across” attached to IUCLID section 13
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across: supporting information
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
2.5
Temp.:
21 °C
Remarks on result:
other: pH neutral
Conclusions:
Teh log Kow of 2,4,7,9-Tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol, ethoxylated ranges from 1.8 to 2.5; 2.5 will be used as key value for chemical safety assessment.

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Log Kow (Log Pow):
2.5
at the temperature of:
21 °C

Additional information

The estimated log Kow of 2,4,7,9-Tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol, ethoxylated (1.3) ranges from 2.51 to 3.61 (EpiSuite v4.11, US EPA, 2012, KOWWIN v1.68).

The partition coefficient (n-octanol/water) of the major component in 2,4,7,9-Tetramethyl-5-Decyne-4,7-Diol is reported to be 6.5E02 (log Low = 2.8) at 22.0 - 22.5 degrees C.

The log Kow of 2,4,7,9-Tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol, ethoxylated (3.8) is reported to range from 1.8 to 2.5.

The value of 2.5 will be used as worst case for chemical safety and risk assessment.

A justification for read-across is attached to Iuclid section 13.