Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2007-12-21 - 1008-02-27
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The study was conducted according to an appropriate test guideline and in compliance with GLP.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2008
Report date:
2008

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
Buehler test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
-
EC Number:
477-700-1
EC Name:
-
Cas Number:
883794-93-2
Molecular formula:
Hill formula: C18H36N2O6S2Si2 CAS formula: C18H36N2O6S2Si2
IUPAC Name:
1-{3-[(3-{2,8,9-trioxa-5-aza-1-silabicyclo[3.3.3]undecan-1-yl}propyl)disulfanyl]propyl}-2,8,9-trioxa-5-aza-1-silabicyclo[3.3.3]undecane

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Lab, Kissleg, Germany
- Weight at study initiation: test group: 359.7±18.9 g and control group: 341.2±18.7 g
- Housing: 2 or 3 animals in Makrolon(r)-cages No.VI
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): as pellet (3023 /Altromin Inten. Lage, Germany)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water
- Acclimation period: 13 days before the main experiment

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22±3
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): 8
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 h light/dark-cycle

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: mixture of sesame oil and acetone (4:1 w/w)
Concentration / amount:
induction and challange: 60 % (w/w)
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: mixture of sesame oil and acetone (4:1 w/w)
Concentration / amount:
induction and challange: 60 % (w/w)
No. of animals per dose:
test group: 20
control group: 10
pilot experiment: 6
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
induction and challange: During chambers with soaked patches; either with 25%; 60%; or 80% (w/w) test substance preparation in vehicle
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 3
- Exposure period: 2 weeks
- Test groups: 1 (20 animals)
- Control group: 1 (6 animals)
- Site: shaved skin on the left flank
- Frequency of applications: day 0; after 7 and 14 days
- Duration: 6 h
- Concentrations: 60 % (w/w)

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: day 28 of the application period
- Exposure period: 6 h
- Test groups: 1 (20 animals)
- Control group: 1 (6 animals)
- Site: on the shaved untreated right flank
- Concentrations: 60% (w/w)
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 and 48 h after patch removal
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole 98% in sesame oil/acetone 4:1 (w/w)

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
sensitisation rate: 25%
A total of 5 out of 20 animals were tested positive, 2 thereof showed skin reactions only during 1st reading 24 hours after challeng, 2 animals showed skin reactions only during 2nd reading 48 hours after challenge, and one animal showed skin reactions during both 1st and 2nd reading.

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
60 % (w/w) test substance in corn oil
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
no
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 60 % (w/w) test substance in corn oil. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: no.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
60 % (w/w) test substance in corn oil
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
no
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 60 % (w/w) test substance in corn oil. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: no.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
60% (w/w)
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
no
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 60% (w/w). No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: no.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
60 % (w/w)
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
no
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 60 % (w/w). No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: no.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
98%
No. with + reactions:
3
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
no data
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: positive control. Dose level: 98%. No with. + reactions: 3.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: no data.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
98%
No. with + reactions:
3
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
no data
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: positive control. Dose level: 98%. No with. + reactions: 3.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: no data.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
The test substance has to be regarded as non-sensitising under the applied test conditions when exposed to the skin of experimental animals.