Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Exposure related observations in humans: other data

Administrative data

Endpoint:
exposure-related observations in humans: other data
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
other information
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Documentation insufficient for assessment.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Occupational sensitization to epoxy resin and reactive diluents in marble workers
Author:
Angelini G, Rigano L, Forti C, Grandolfo M, Vena GA, Bonamonte D, Soleo L, Scorpinti AA
Year:
1996
Bibliographic source:
Contact Dermatitis 35, 11-16

Materials and methods

Endpoint addressed:
dermal absorption
Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Marble workers handling a bicomponent resin, based on epoxy resin and ortho-cresyl glycidyl ether (CGE), were investigated for their development of a contact dermatitis and airborne contact dermatitis within 20 days to 2 month of exposure.

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
phenyl glycidyl ether
IUPAC Name:
phenyl glycidyl ether
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): phenyl glycidyl ether
No further information.

Method

Ethical approval:
not specified
Details on study design:
2 months after the regular use of epoxy resin was introduced, 10 of 22 workers complained of the onset of pruriginous dermatitis and 2 of them also asthmatic manifestations. All 22 workers, symptomatic and not, were referred for investigation and assessment of suitable compensation. Anamnesis and clinical examination suggested that the dermatitis was work-related. All subjects were patch tested with the European standard series, bisphenol A, epichlorohydrin, ortho-cresyl glycidyl ether (CGE) and other reactive diluents.

Results and discussion

Applicant's summary and conclusion