Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 219-669-7 | CAS number: 2494-89-5
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 28.11.1989 - 01.12.1989
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study according to GLP.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 989
- Report date:
- 1989
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-[(p-aminophenyl)sulphonyl]ethyl hydrogensulphate
- EC Number:
- 219-669-7
- EC Name:
- 2-[(p-aminophenyl)sulphonyl]ethyl hydrogensulphate
- Cas Number:
- 2494-89-5
- Molecular formula:
- C8H11NO6S2
- IUPAC Name:
- [2-(4-aminobenzenesulfonyl)ethoxy]sulfonic acid
- Details on test material:
- p-Base Ester
Batch: Op. 1299 / 1989
CoA: 1196 dated 25.09. 1989
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Hoechst AG, Kastengrund
- Weight at study initiation: 3060g - 3690g
- Housing: single
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Standard food Altromin 2123 Haltungsdiät - Kaninchen and hay
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 +/-3°C
- Humidity (%): 50 +/- 20 %
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 per day
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 100 mg
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hours
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 72 hours
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- The test item was applied to the left eye of each rabbit. The contra-lateral eye served as intra-individual control. Evaluation 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours after test item application by means of a magnifying lens. After 24 hours the eyes were rinsed with physiological saline solution.
At 24 and 72 hours, eyes were stained with Fluorescein-sodium-solution (0.01%) and investigated under UV-light by means of a slit lamp.
Results and discussion
In vivo
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 2.9
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 2
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 2.9
- Score:
- 24
- Max. score:
- 3
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 2.7
- Max. score:
- 4
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Classification according 83/467/EWG: R41 - risk of serious damage to eyes
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
