Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Remarks:
other: There was no data available
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP - Guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
other: Body responsible for the test
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1995

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: EC Directive 92/69/eec, Part B, Method B6
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
not specified
Justification for non-LLNA method:
In vivo studies have been already performed, so no LLNA method is required.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2,2-(1,4-phenylene)bis((4H-3,1-benzoxazine-4-one)
EC Number:
418-280-1
EC Name:
2,2-(1,4-phenylene)bis((4H-3,1-benzoxazine-4-one)
Cas Number:
18600-59-4
Molecular formula:
C22H12N2O4
IUPAC Name:
2-[4-(4-oxo-4H-3,1-benzoxazin-2-yl)phenyl]-4H-3,1-benzoxazin-4-one

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
other: Guinea pig, Dunkin-Hartley

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction
Concentration / amount:
Concentration of test material and vehicle used at induction;
Intradermal injection: 5% w/v in Alembicol D

Topical Application: 60% w/v in Alembicol D

Concentration of test material and vehicle used for each challenge:

60 and 30 % w/v in Alembicol D.
Challenge
Concentration / amount:
Concentration of test material and vehicle used at induction;
Intradermal injection: 5% w/v in Alembicol D

Topical Application: 60% w/v in Alembicol D

Concentration of test material and vehicle used for each challenge:

60 and 30 % w/v in Alembicol D.
No. of animals per dose:
Number of animals in test group: 20
Number of animals in negative control group: 10

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
60 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 60 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
30%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 30%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
30 %
No. with + reactions:
1
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 30 %. No with. + reactions: 1.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
60 %
No. with + reactions:
1
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 60 %. No with. + reactions: 1.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
30 %
No. with + reactions:
6
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 30 %. No with. + reactions: 6.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
60 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 60 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
30 %
No. with + reactions:
2
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 30 %. No with. + reactions: 2.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
60 %
No. with + reactions:
2
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 60 %. No with. + reactions: 2.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
30 %
No. with + reactions:
3
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 30 %. No with. + reactions: 3.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
60 %
No. with + reactions:
3
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 60 %. No with. + reactions: 3.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
30 %
No. with + reactions:
4
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 30 %. No with. + reactions: 4.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
60 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 60 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
30 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 30 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
60 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 60 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
30 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 30 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
30 %
No. with + reactions:
1
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 30 %. No with. + reactions: 1.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Maximum concentration not causing irritating effects in preliminary test: 60 %

Signs of irritation during induction:

Intradermal Jinjections;

Necrosis was recorded at sites receiving Freunds Complete Adjuvant in test and control animals.

Slight erythema was observed in test animals following topical application with the substance, 60 % w/v in Alembicol D and slight erythema was seen in the control guinea-pigs.

Evidence of sensitisation of each challenge concentration:

First Study:

After intredermal induction slight irritation was seen in test animals at sites receiving the test substance and in control animals receiveing Alembicol D alone. After topical receiving the test substance and in control animals receiving Alembicol D alone.

- At the first challenge five test animals gave a positive response (slight erythema) and two animals gave an inconclusive response. In the rechallenge (one week after the first challenge, same dose level) five test animals gave a positive response. In the first as well in the seconed challenge three animals showed a positive result.

Seconed Study:

After intrademal induction slight irritation was seen in test animals at sites receiving the test substance and in control animals receiving Alembicol D alone. After topical induction slight erythema was seen in test animals at sites receiving the test substance and in control animals receiving Alembical D alone.

- At the first challenge one test animals gave an inconclusive response. A rechallenge was performed. The other test animals did not show a positive response.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: