Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Pigment Red 242 (nano form): not sensitising (LLNA)

Structure analogue Pigment Red 144 (nano form and not specified form): not sensitising (LLNA)

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vitro
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
an in vitro skin sensitisation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo skin sensitisation study are available
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP and OECD guideline compliant study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Netherlands, NL - 5960 AD Horst
- Age at study initiation: 8 - 12 weeks (beginning of acclimatization)
- Weight at study initiation: mean 18.5g
- Housing: single
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period:

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3°C
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 2004-11-03 To: 2004-11-09
Vehicle:
acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
Concentration:
7.5, 15 and 30%
No. of animals per dose:
4
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
- Compound solubility: The data showed that the highest test item concentration, which can be used was a 30 % suspension in acetone:olive oil, 4:1 (viv). In DMF or DMSO only up to 20 % could be suspended
- Irritation: In a non-GLP conform pre-test in !wo mice, test item concentrations of 5, 10, 20, and 30 % (w/v) were tested on one ear each. No irritation effects were observed at these concentrations after a single application. (Due to the intense red colour of the test item local irritation reactions such as ear redness could not be detected" No swelling of the ears was observed.)
- Lymph node proliferation response: not measured in the range-finder

MAIN STUDY
ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Name of test method: 3H-methyl thymidine incorporation
- Criteria used to consider a positive response: 3fold increase in Stimulation index compared to vehicle control

TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION: Substance was suspended in vehicle on the day of treatment.
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
Statistics:
Included for body weight and SI
Positive control results:
performed in April 2004, a-Hexylcinnamaldehyde in Acetone/olive oil. EC3 = 6.3%
Parameter:
SI
Value:
ca. 0.5
Test group / Remarks:
Concentration 30%
Parameter:
SI
Value:
ca. 0.7
Test group / Remarks:
Concentration 15%
Parameter:
SI
Value:
ca. 0.8
Test group / Remarks:
Concentration 7.5%
Parameter:
other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
Remarks on result:
other: DPM per lymph node: Control: 521 7.5% = 424 15% = 348 30% = 259
Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification

The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation 1272/2008. As a result the substance is not considered to be classified for skin sensitization under Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, as amended for the third time in Directive (EC 618/2012).